Also, check out:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/debunkingdebunkerstwo/
"We forteans could be characterised as benign sceptics,
taking nothing on trust but tolerating the surreal fringes of explanation until they are supplanted by more convincing evidence. We use 'sceptic' in this sense and distinguish it from the word skeptic (with a 'k') which can usefully be employed to cover the militancy (exemplified by CSICOP) which starts from the premise that most unexplained phenomena area priori impossible. Of course, current
dictionaries don't make this distinction; perhaps we need a new word." ~ Fortean Times 1/02Put on your aluminum hats and debunk the debunkers who subscribe to the gods of scientism! Make fun of CSICOP, sigh over the rabid rantings of religious fundamentalists, rant against material rationalists - even debunk yourself!
Forum Owner/Moderator/Grand Poobah: pack_rat2@yahoo.com, aka kc5blf@yahoo.com, etc, etc.
I don't participate in Greek choruses of backslapping followers who never question the basis for their beliefs. Sorry to disappoint you, but this is an open
John, Every group has a certain purpose, philosophy and focus. That's why they're moderated. My understanding of the purpose of this group was for likeminded
What you WANT is a forum where everyone agrees with you. What you do NOT want is anyone to simply point out that many "mysteries" have been manufactured. If
Ausiepath, It would seem a simple experiment to choose the biggest and most complex crop circle that has yet appeared and have a group of people, perhaps those
Actually what it is is convenient. Saying "the Army" secured a given area puts a patina of authenticity to a claim that can be plausible any way the claim