Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
discussion-pcausa · PCAUSA Discussion List
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
request for help on driver signing   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #8238 of 8603 |
RE: [discussion-pcausa] request for help on driver signing

We have applied latest WLK filters and Rerun device path exerciser test.

PNP test still fails but I read on Microsoft Forum that PNP test results can be skipped for Software driver by applying Erata ID 295 and sending the readme file with Winqual submission.

There were instances of one professional who got this driver signed two times with this change.

 

Regards

 

Viraj Shirgaonkar

Software Engineer

Persistent Systems Limited

Extn 640


From: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Thomas F. Divine
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 7:52 PM
To: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [discussion-pcausa] request for help on driver signing

 

What was the root cause of your problem?

 

Thomas

 

From: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Viraj Shirgaonkar
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 5:56 AM
To: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com
Cc: viraj_shirgaonkar@persistent.co.in; Joviano Dias
Subject: RE: [discussion-pcausa] request for help on driver signing

 

Hi Thomas,

 

I am successful  in creating CPK file after DTM Test results.

Thank you for your kind help in my journey of driversigning.

I have two submissions One for Service and another for Miniport.

So I have 2 CPK files one for each submission.

When I upload on WinQual submission tool, which CPK should I upload?

Can you please give our thoughts on this?

 

Regards

 

Viraj Shirgaonkar

Software Engineer

Persistent Systems Limited

Extn 640


From: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Thomas F. Divine
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 11:40 AM
To: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [discussion-pcausa] request for help on driver signing

 

It sounds like you are doing all that you can. I don’t have any good advice to help you go further. You may have to open an incident with the DTM group to help you get through this. That is not an easy task.

 

Wild ideas that I have never had to try myself but I would try in desperation myself. I suspect that you have already done these.

1.)    Shutdown client.

2.)    Reboot DTM server.

3.)    Restart client.

4.)    Wait a while

5.)    Reset client

6.)    Try to make submission again.

Make sure all paths in your DTM installation contain only ASCII characters and no whitespace. (Nothing says this should matter…).

 

Do both INF files include a CatalogFile entry? Is the catalog file built using the Inf2Cat tool? Is the .CAT file signed using the WDK signtool utility?

 

Does the create dimension test that is performed after you Reset the client run to completion?

 

I believe that the create dimension test makes a catalog of installed drivers, etc. and I think you can review these to see if your driver is there.

 

Testing really shouldn’t be this hard.

 

Thomas

 

From: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Viraj Shirgaonkar
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 12:58 AM
To: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [discussion-pcausa] request for help on driver signing

 

I am doing Service(NETIM.INF) Submission first and then Miniport(NETIM_M.INF) submission.

 

Regards

 

Viraj Shirgaonkar

 

From: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Thomas F. Divine
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 10:43 AM
To: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [discussion-pcausa] request for help on driver signing

 

Which submission do you try to make first? Miniport or Service?

 

In any event, try reversing the order that you attempt to create submissions. (and hold mouth correctly…).

 

Thomas

 

 

From: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Viraj Shirgaonkar
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 12:07 AM
To: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [discussion-pcausa] request for help on driver signing

 

Hi Thomas,

 

Yes we do use static IP addresses for everything and also delete previous pools and create fresh pool every time we run the tests .

We also place machine from cancelled pool to default and then drag the machine from default pool to newly created pool.

 

All steps that we follow seem to be correct but still not able to rectify this only error in our DTM Tests.

 

Regards

 

Viraj Shirgaonkar


From: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Thomas F. Divine
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 10:27 AM
To: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [discussion-pcausa] request for help on driver signing

 

I think it is essential for the submission creation process to find the driver at that step.

 

I encountered this condition when using a multi-boot machine and never was fully sure what steps “fixed” the problem.

 

On multi-boot machine after running any test and switching to a new client image I have to remove all traces of the previous test from the DTM. That is:

 

1.)    Delete the old submissions on the Device Console.

2.)    In Job Monitor, move machine to Default pool.

3.)    In JM, delete the pool itself.

4.)    In JM delete all test results.

 

Then

 

1.)    Add the Unclassified machine pool back.

2.)    Move machine from default pool to the newly re-created Unclassified pool.

3.)    Reset the client.

4.)    Go to dinner while the initial dimension preparation test runs.

5.)    After dinner, create the submissions again.

 

Are you using static IP addresses for everything?

 

Thomas F. Divine

 

From: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Viraj Shirgaonkar
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 11:24 PM
To: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com
Cc: Joviano Dias
Subject: RE: [discussion-pcausa] request for help on driver signing

 

Hi Thomas,

 

When we are creating a new submission by loading INF files from Client Machine we get an Error:

Device Not Found, Still Continue? Yes or No.

If we select No, submission process stops .

Till now we were selecting Yes and going ahead with the tests.

 

Could this error may be a problem for our Plug and Play test error?.

 

Regards

 

Viraj Shirgaonkar


From: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Thomas F. Divine
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 7:55 PM
To: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [discussion-pcausa] request for help on driver signing

 

I used a workgroup configuration here.

 

My network does have two separate intranets in my office. One is for normal message traffic and the second is reserved for testing. Both machines had one interface on each network.

 

I did bind the NDIS IM being tested to only the one adapter on the test network.

 

Thomas F. Divine

 

 

From: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Viraj Shirgaonkar
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 7:06 AM
To: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com
Cc: Joviano Dias; viraj_shirgaonkar@persistent.co.in
Subject: RE: [discussion-pcausa] request for help on driver signing

 

Hi Thomas,

 

Could I request for just one more piece of information on Plug and Play Driver Test error that we are facing?

 

Do we have to setup the network of the two machines (DTM Client and DTM Controller) in a specific way like additional NIC/ any other network configuration…..?

 

Currently we have setup both the machines in Workgroup mode with each machine having only one NIC.

 

 

Regards

 

Viraj Shirgaonkar


From: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Thomas F. Divine
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 10:10 AM
To: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [discussion-pcausa] request for help on driver signing

 

Sorry. Sounds like this could be a DTM setup problem.

 

Are these the results that you see when you use the Device Console, select the submission and then press the Status button?

 

I just finished testing a NDIS 5 IM driver using the Unclassified test on Windows XP. Vista x86 and Vista x64. (Six test runs, about 6 hours each not counting re-imaging, etc…). I used the same procedure that I outlined before.

 

All six passed successfully with the PnP test being one of the shortest runs.

 

I’m sorry, but I can’t be of further help…

 

Good luck,

 

Thomas F. Divine

 

 

From: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Viraj Shirgaonkar
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2008 11:00 PM
To: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com
Cc: viraj_shirgaonkar@persistent.co.in
Subject: RE: [discussion-pcausa] request for help on driver signing

 

Hi Thomas,

 

We have applied the changes suggested by you and we were successful in eliminating 2 errors out of three.

The only error remaining is Plug and Play Driver Test. Report for Plug and Play Driver Test is as follows

Pass[0] Fail[3]  -:|:- Plug and Play Driver Test

- Pass[0] Fail[1]  -:|:- RunJob - Plug and Play Driver Test - Library Job

Log:  NotRequired

 Pass[0] Fail[1]  -:|:- Run Remove PNPDTest

Log:  Missing

 Pass[0] Fail[1]  -:|:- Run Surprise PNPD Test

Log:  Missing

 Pass[0] Fail[1]  -:|:- Run Rebalance PNPD Test

Log:  Missing

 

Can you please give us some suggestions on these errors?

 

Regards

 

Viraj Shirgaonkar

 


From: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Thomas F. Divine
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 9:39 PM
To: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [discussion-pcausa] request for help on driver signing

 

Some additional thoughts...

If you are unfamiliar with WLK I would suggest that you attach WinDbg to the
test client at first. The debug message output during the test will give you
some feeling about what is going on.

In addition, if you have WinDbg attached and the driver crashes, then you
can investigate the cause of the crash on the spot.

You should also try to insure that your test client is reliable and do some
test runs with known good drivers. I invested many hours of "dry runs" just
learning what it takes to be successful. In the early stages it is not
uncommon to have to make many attempts at a test before you actually get it
to pass.

Using the DTM is, unfortunately, extremely frustrating. Believe it or not,
DTM is much better now than it was a year ago.

Thomas F. Divine

> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:discussion-
> pcausa@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Thomas F. Divine
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 10:18 AM
> To: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [discussion-pcausa] request for help on driver signing
>
> It looks like you have a lot of problems.
>
> 1.) INF Test
> ============
> It is always frustrating the first time you try to make a solid set of
> INFs.
> My suggestion is to take the INF files from the Passthru sample from a
> recent DDK (Build 3790 or later) and systematically modify those files.
> The
> Passthru sample INF file from earlier DDKs and from some older PCAUSA
> samples have some problems.
>
> You still haven't provided any information about the error returned by
> the
> DTM when it runs the INFTest, This information:
>
> "> cmd /c set
> path=%path%;C:\WTT\JobsWorkingDir\Tasks\WTTJobRun4AE25A56-6061-4E2B-
> BDC8-48C
> 8EEFD9CA4 &&
> "C:\WTT\JobsWorkingDir\Tasks\WTTJobRun4AE25A56-6061-4E2B-BDC8-
> 48C8EEFD9CA4\i
> 386\inftest.exe" -wdk -p
> > C:\WTT\JobsWorkingDir\Tasks\WTTJobRun4AE25A56-6061-4E2B-BDC8-
> 48C8EEFD9CA4
> -f /LG -l %windir%\inf\
> > Failed with ExitCode 1
> > Resolution
> > No resolution provided."
>
> Is of no help to me and no help to you either. Use the DTM Device
> Console,
> select your submission, then press the Status button on the right. When
> the
> status page is displayed, press the Report button at the bottom right.
> It
> brings up a page where the INFTest should appear in RED. Drill through
> that
> until you find the inftest.xml file. Open that and you should find more
> information - although it is difficult to read XML...
>
> There may be problems in the way you may have created your submission
> for
> the NDIS IM driver. You must create two submissions" one for the IM
> service
> and one for the IM miniport. If you create one submission and select
> two INF
> files it will fail. Remember, the test is called "Run INFTest against a
> single INF file". If you provide two INF files, it will fail.
>
> You must be using the mist recent WLK, of course.
>
> In addition, there are still problems with the WLK when testing IM
> filter
> drivers. As a matter of fact, my testing has shown that even with a
> good set
> of INFs and the most current WKL the INF test will still fail.
>
> Unless...
>
> You add the most recent filters to your DTM. See the URL:
>
> https://winqual.microsoft.com/default.aspx
>
> When I added the filter update, the INF file test passed.
>
> If the INFTest fails you may have problems with other tests.
>
>
> 2.) PnP Test
> ============
> I have never seen this fail with a NDIS IM driver. Perhaps the WLK
> filter
> update will fix this issue. If not, then the WDK includes pnp test
> tools
> that you can run outside of the DTM.
>
>
> 3.) Device Path Exerciser
> ========================
> Here the problem is clear. Read the Device Path Exerciser and try to
> understand what it is doing. Basically, it is going to call your
> driver's
> IOCTL entry points with bogus data in an attempt to uncover places in
> your
> driver where you have not taken the time to validate input parameters.
> For
> example, an IOCTL may expect a DWORD input, and you assume that a DWORD
> is
> provided. The test may pass something shorter than a DWORD or no input
> buffer at all.
>
> The DDK provides a stand-alone version of the DevicePath exerciser I
> believe. If not, then DriverVerifier can be configured to do the same
> thing.
>
> Once you find a problem with the debugger fix it - but don't stop
> there.
> Understand that you should validate all inputs before using them and
> systematically fix similar problems in other IOCTLs where DV may not
> have
> (yet) found a problem.
>
> Good luck,
>
> Thomas F. Divine
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:discussion-
> > pcausa@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of virajshirgaonkar
> > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 5:31 AM
> > To: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [discussion-pcausa] request for help on driver signing
> >
> >
> > Problems faced during driver signing process as discussed
> > during previous posts.
> > 1) We ran inf2cat tool to generate catalog files on passthru
> > filter driver's INF files and we found that catalog directive was
> > missing in those files.
> > 2) We added CatalogFile directive in Version Section in these
> > INF files and passed these files to inf2cat tool and Cat files were
> > successfully completed with our change.
> > 3) Then we ran chkinf utility .First we got some errors. So we
> > made following changes to INF files
> > a) we changed Msft macros value from Microsoft
> > to "test_Company" in both INF files
> > b) commented Copyfiles which was not assigned a value in
> > Passthrump.ndi Section
> > 4) After we made following changes Passthru's netsf.inf and
> > netsf_m.inf files gave us success in chkinf utility.
> > 5) With this we had some base INF files testing passing our
> > tests in inf2cat and chkinf utilities.
> > 6) Then we used the above understanding to resolve the errors
> > in NETIM.INF and NETIM_M.INF.
> > 7) In NETIM.INF in DestinationDirs section %windir%\inf
> > directory-id was given wrong value ( instead of giving value 20,
> > value 17 was given). We removed this error.
> > 8) Manufacturer PCAUSA section changed to normal case.
> > 9) Commented DelService directive in
> > PCASIMCL.Ndi.Remove.Service because it was giving an error saying
> > service not defined.
> > 10) With these changes all errors that we were getting in
> > inf2cat and chkinf utilities were eliminated.
> > 11) After running DTM tests on the above INF files Results were
> > as follows:
> > a) Run INF test against single INF failed.
> > b) Device Path Exerciser test was continuously running because
> > client got crashed when test was running.
> > c) Plug and Play driver test was found to be failing.
> >
> > 12) We checked the details of above errors
> > PNPD Errors
> > 1. Remove PNPDTest
> >
> > Failed to Parse the RollupCounts XML
> > file "C:\WTT\JobsWorkingDir\Tasks\WTTJobRun26936487-BA6E-4CD7-B814-
> > BC0685948898\B88C5DE6-4162-437B-8E3F-973B46CF2862.xml" For Task "Run
> > Remove PNPDTest".
> > Error Code 1025 (Unknown error (0x401))
> > Resolution
> > No resolution provided.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2. Run Surprise PNPD Test
> > Failed to Parse the RollupCounts XML
> > file "C:\WTT\JobsWorkingDir\Tasks\WTTJobRun26936487-BA6E-4CD7-B814-
> > BC0685948898\C5EAD360-7485-4851-B689-B298EDD96281.xml" For Task "Run
> > Surprise PNPD Test".
> > Error Code 1025 (Unknown error (0x401))
> >
> > 3. Run Rebalance PNPD Test
> > Failed to Parse the RollupCounts XML
> > file "C:\WTT\JobsWorkingDir\Tasks\WTTJobRun26936487-BA6E-4CD7-B814-
> > BC0685948898\AD9B897A-E41D-4F11-BA4C-E115C2277DBB.xml" For Task "Run
> > Rebalance PNPD Test".
> > Error Code 1025 (Unknown error (0x401))
> > Cannot Find Pattern "C:\WTT\JobsWorkingDir\Tasks\WTTJobRun26936487-
> > BA6E-4CD7-B814-BC0685948898\pnpdtest-log.xml"
> > Error Code 2 (The system cannot find the file specified)
> >
> > Resolution
> > No resolution provided.
> >
> > CHKInf and INFTest Library Job
> >
> > 1. The Execute Task with Commandline
> >
> > cmd /c set path=%path%;C:\WTT\JobsWorkingDir\Tasks\WTTJobRun4AE25A56-
> > 6061-4E2B-BDC8-48C8EEFD9CA4
> > && "C:\WTT\JobsWorkingDir\Tasks\WTTJobRun4AE25A56-6061-4E2B-BDC8-
> > 48C8EEFD9CA4\i386\inftest.exe" -wdk -p
> > C:\WTT\JobsWorkingDir\Tasks\WTTJobRun4AE25A56-6061-4E2B-BDC8-
> > 48C8EEFD9CA4 -f /LG -l %windir%\inf\
> > Failed with ExitCode 1
> > Resolution
> > No resolution provided.
> >
> > Device Path Exerciser
> >
> > 1. Client Machine Crashes.
> >
> > Could you please guide us in this area?
> >
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------
>
> Copyright (c) 1999-2008 Printing Communications Assoc., Inc. (PCAUSA)
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>



Mon Feb 11, 2008 4:09 am

virajshirgao...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #8238 of 8603 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

We are supposed to do driver signing of PCAUSA NDIS 5 IM Filter driver for which we are following the steps defined below given by Windows Logo kit. We are...
Viraj Shirgaonkar
virajshirgao...
Offline Send Email
Jan 23, 2008
4:35 am

I believe that you have asked this question several times. The steps you have taken seem about right. The first thing to do is to examine the DTM logs and see...
Thomas F. Divine
pcatom
Offline Send Email
Jan 23, 2008
4:45 am

Hi Thomas, we tried WDK ChkInf tool as you said against NETIM.inf and NETIM_M.inf files and got the following results with some errors. For NETIM.inf File ...
virajshirgaonkar
virajshirgao...
Offline Send Email
Jan 23, 2008
1:48 pm

I am thinking that you may be using an old version of ChkINF. Use the version of ChkINF from the WDK 6000. Now you have identified the errors. That is the...
Thomas F. Divine
pcatom
Offline Send Email
Jan 23, 2008
2:17 pm

I am trying the steps that you have mentioned for eliminating Catalogue Error. Thanks for replying. To eliminate Device Path Exerciser error, I am using...
virajshirgaonkar
virajshirgao...
Offline Send Email
Jan 24, 2008
1:08 pm

Did you pass the correct driver or device name to the tool when you started it? NETIM.INF is NOT the driver or service name of anything... Good luck, Thomas F....
Thomas F. Divine
pcatom
Offline Send Email
Jan 24, 2008
1:22 pm

Problems faced during driver signing process as discussed during previous posts. 1) We ran inf2cat tool to generate catalog files on passthru filter driver's...
virajshirgaonkar
virajshirgao...
Offline Send Email
Jan 31, 2008
2:05 pm

It looks like you have a lot of problems. 1.) INF Test ============ It is always frustrating the first time you try to make a solid set of INFs. My suggestion...
Thomas F. Divine
pcatom
Offline Send Email
Jan 31, 2008
3:18 pm

Some additional thoughts... If you are unfamiliar with WLK I would suggest that you attach WinDbg to the test client at first. The debug message output during...
Thomas F. Divine
pcatom
Offline Send Email
Jan 31, 2008
4:09 pm

Hi Thomas, We have applied the changes suggested by you and we were successful in eliminating 2 errors out of three. The only error remaining is Plug and Play...
Viraj Shirgaonkar
virajshirgao...
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2008
4:17 am

Sorry. Sounds like this could be a DTM setup problem. Are these the results that you see when you use the Device Console, select the submission and then press...
Thomas F. Divine
pcatom
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2008
4:40 am

Hi Thomas, Could I request for just one more piece of information on Plug and Play Driver Test error that we are facing? Do we have to setup the network of the...
Viraj Shirgaonkar
virajshirgao...
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2008
2:05 pm

I used a workgroup configuration here. My network does have two separate intranets in my office. One is for normal message traffic and the second is reserved...
Thomas F. Divine
pcatom
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2008
2:25 pm

Hi Thomas, When we are creating a new submission by loading INF files from Client Machine we get an Error: Device Not Found, Still Continue? Yes or No. If we...
Viraj Shirgaonkar
virajshirgao...
Offline Send Email
Feb 5, 2008
4:25 am

I think it is essential for the submission creation process to find the driver at that step. I encountered this condition when using a multi-boot machine and...
Thomas F. Divine
pcatom
Offline Send Email
Feb 5, 2008
4:57 am

Hi Thomas, Yes we do use static IP addresses for everything and also delete previous pools and create fresh pool every time we run the tests . We also place...
Viraj Shirgaonkar
virajshirgao...
Offline Send Email
Feb 5, 2008
5:09 am

Which submission do you try to make first? Miniport or Service? In any event, try reversing the order that you attempt to create submissions. (and hold mouth...
Thomas F. Divine
pcatom
Offline Send Email
Feb 5, 2008
5:13 am

Tried submitting in reverse order. But got same results. Regards Viraj Shirgaonkar _____ From: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com ...
Viraj Shirgaonkar
virajshirgao...
Offline Send Email
Feb 5, 2008
5:50 am

I am doing Service(NETIM.INF) Submission first and then Miniport(NETIM_M.INF) submission. Regards Viraj Shirgaonkar From: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com ...
Viraj Shirgaonkar
virajshirgao...
Offline Send Email
Feb 5, 2008
5:58 am

It sounds like you are doing all that you can. I don't have any good advice to help you go further. You may have to open an incident with the DTM group to help...
Thomas F. Divine
pcatom
Offline Send Email
Feb 5, 2008
6:10 am

Hi Thomas, I am successful in creating CPK file after DTM Test results. Thank you for your kind help in my journey of driversigning. I have two submissions...
Viraj Shirgaonkar
virajshirgao...
Offline Send Email
Feb 8, 2008
2:08 pm

Both. Thomas From: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Viraj Shirgaonkar Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008...
Thomas F. Divine
pcatom
Offline Send Email
Feb 8, 2008
2:19 pm

What was the root cause of your problem? Thomas From: discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:discussion-pcausa@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Viraj...
Thomas F. Divine
pcatom
Offline Send Email
Feb 8, 2008
2:22 pm

We have applied latest WLK filters and Rerun device path exerciser test. PNP test still fails but I read on Microsoft Forum that PNP test results can be...
Viraj Shirgaonkar
virajshirgao...
Offline Send Email
Feb 11, 2008
4:31 am

... I am trying to run the DTM 1.2 (latest) for a virtual ethernet driver, i run unclassified signature test and got most passed except the PNPD testing......
qiangieee
Online Now Send Email
Aug 7, 2008
11:41 pm

Hi Thomas, I want to use same driver on both Window XP SP2 and Windows Vista . How should we correlate 4 CPK files( 2 cpk for XP and 2 for Vista) loaded in ...
Viraj Shirgaonkar
virajshirgao...
Offline Send Email
Feb 12, 2008
4:52 am

I have not done this. Sorry. In my cases so far the Vista and pre-Vista drivers have been different. For example, on Vista I may use the kernel IP Helper and...
Thomas F. Divine
pcatom
Offline Send Email
Feb 12, 2008
5:23 am

Hi Thomas, There is great news. We created 4 CPK files. Service-XP-x86 Miniport-XP-x86 Service-Vista-x86 Miniport-Vista-x86 And signed the cab file and...
Viraj Shirgaonkar
virajshirgao...
Offline Send Email
Feb 22, 2008
1:20 pm

Hello Viral, I am also going to begin working on the process of signing and quite new to it. So I would request you kindly document in detail the steps taken...
prashant narurkar
p_narur2000
Offline Send Email
Feb 22, 2008
2:46 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help