From ekimber@... Tue Jan 06 08:09:39 2009
Return-Path: <ekimber@...>
X-Sender: ekimber@...
X-Apparently-To: dita-users@yahoogroups.com
X-Received: (qmail 38952 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2009 16:09:38 -0000
X-Received: from unknown (66.218.67.95)
by m55.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 6 Jan 2009 16:09:38 -0000
X-Received: from unknown (HELO psmtp.com) (64.18.1.38)
by mta16.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Jan 2009 16:09:38 -0000
X-Received: from source ([63.240.6.3]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob117.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP
ID DSNKSWOCQXM+FtMrdZ7ojLw77X9DROFqA1ZU@...; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:09:38 PST
X-Received: from d01smtp06.Mi8.com ([172.16.1.239]) by Outbound02.Mi8.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:09:36 -0500
X-Received: from MI8NYCMAIL10.Mi8.com ([172.16.1.235]) by d01smtp06.Mi8.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:09:36 -0500
X-Received: from 65.246.22.162 ([65.246.22.162]) by MI8NYCMAIL10.Mi8.com ([172.16.1.210]) via Exchange Front-End Server mi8owa.mi8.com ([172.16.1.108]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ;
Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:09:14 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.15.0.081119
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:09:13 -0600
To: <dita-users@yahoogroups.com>
Message-ID: <C588DE49.BF2F%ekimber@...>
Thread-Topic: [dita-users] Re: DITA for SOPs?
Thread-Index: AclwGR2bFxjFb8QPpU+oB7TyMbdHag==
In-Reply-To: <gjvu16+skj5@eGroups.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain;
charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Return-Path: ekimber@...
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jan 2009 16:09:36.0967 (UTC) FILETIME=[2BE4AD70:01C97019]
X-Originating-IP: 64.18.1.38
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0:0
From: Eliot Kimber <ekimber@...>
Subject: Re: [dita-users] Re: DITA for SOPs?
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=315620316; y=E1cbkC5vi0-ECeTNRyTPiZ2rWzfRTxsVU4mfA7cVVGYJOg
X-Yahoo-Profile: drmacro
> I was asked this question by Mgt just yesterday. With the economic
> downturn, my employer is pushing to ramp-up SOP development, and Mgt
> wants to know if DITA would be a good template. Is anyone using DITA
> for SOPs? If so, do you find Concept-Task-Reference sufficient, or is
> a new specialization needed?
If there is a standard structure or content for your SOPs it's probably
worth the effort to develop a specialized topic type or types that implement
those standards. The new more general task type in DITA 1.2 is probably a
more attractive specialization base than the more techdoc-specific task
topic type in DITA 1.1 and prior.
If you have specific formatting requirements for SOPs (which seems likely),
having a specialization will tend to make it easier to automate that
formatting as well.
Has anyone considered using DITA for Policies and Procedures / Standard Operating Procedures? They are also a collection of Concept (policies) Steps ...
... Standard Operating Procedures? They are also a collection of Concept (policies) Steps (Procedures) and Reference, including choice tables, notes and all...
I was asked this question by Mgt just yesterday. With the economic downturn, my employer is pushing to ramp-up SOP development, and Mgt wants to know if DITA...
... If there is a standard structure or content for your SOPs it's probably worth the effort to develop a specialized topic type or types that implement those...