Hello, I am trying to integrate DKIM signature with QMAIL MTA. I can´t belive that DKIM is integrated with sendmail, postfix and other and not with QMAIL. I...
I have tried with three methods: nowsp, simple and relaxed and the out it's the same with noswp: DKIM-Status: Canonicalization type nowsp is no longer valid...
I thought I'd let you know that our reflector now does DKIM verification. The update was actually done quite a while back, but we didn't make an announcement,...
Juan, your verifier works with our signatures without any problems (so far). And I must say that the report returned from your reflector is very impressive and...
Arvel Hathcock
arvel.hathcock@...
Apr 23, 2007 11:47 pm
23
... errrr, reflect ... various reflectors? Right now, our reflector is verifying allman-01 and ietf-0.5. We will be changing to ietf-1.0 ASAP! -- Arvel...
Arvel Hathcock
arvel.hathcock@...
Apr 24, 2007 2:40 am
24
Hi Dave, ... Please add ours to the list. We support the -10 ietf draft only. .. Juan...
I've just pushed out a new version that adds canonicalization tracing and also fixes an issue verifying 'relaxed' headers if the signature is followed by a...
Hello. I have DKIM signing enabled on my Secure Computing Ironmail appliance. When sending test messages to the dkim.org reflector I get mixed results. When...
I have been noticing quite a few signature failures lately due to the g= value on the key not matching the local-part of the i= value in the signature. This...
I trying to implement DKIM within our email service. I'm receiving the result from the reflector: [DKIM-Sig: Warning] Null Signature. I try to modify several...
Hello everybody. I´m new in this group :) Yesterday i found a DKIM Proxy at http://demo.a- sit.at/it_sicherheit/dkim_proxy/index.html It works with Exchange...
RFC4871 – Section 3.7 The signer/verifier MUST compute two hashes, one over the body of the message and one over the selected header fields of the message. ...
I'll comment on a few things that jumped out to me... You might also be interested in the dkim-dev list, which (theoretically) is more oriented toward...
Hi Jason; Thanks for your email. I am a bit unclear between the content of b= and bh=. Suppose I have the following code fragment (I think it will give me the...
Hi Jason; Thanks for your email. I am a bit unclear between the content of b= and bh=. Suppose I have the following code fragment (I think it will give me the...
Hello, I'm testing my dkim signing implementation and the following body causes my test to fail -- the perl dkim-filter package says that messages generated...
Hi, all -- I am starting to work with DKIM headers, and I would like decode some existing DKIM headers (e.g., from gmail). Can anyone point me to a standalone...
Thanks, Matt -- A big help! BTW, for anyone reading this, the release version of dkim-filter requires that a key be already generated for your system. If not, ...
... Hey Jim, Sorry to hear about your reflector shutting down! It was a great service and its sad that a few bad apples have to spoil it for everyone. Thanks...
Hello, I'm also sorry because I used this service. If I can help you to bring it back, or some ideas for passing abuse I'll be glad. Here is a good service to...
bummer. will you be updating <http://testing.dkim.org/> to indicate that the reflector is now disabled? d/ ... -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking ...
Yes, I updated http://testing.dkim.org/reflector.html at the time I turned off the reflector. I'm going to poll a couple of the other reflector operators to...
... Jim, Yeah, I missed that. Sorry. I think my confusion came from the top of: <http://testing.dkim.org/> ... which seemed like it must still be running. d/ ...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
