I thought I'd let you know that our reflector now does DKIM verification. The update was actually done quite a while back, but we didn't make an announcement,...
Juan, your verifier works with our signatures without any problems (so far). And I must say that the report returned from your reflector is very impressive and...
Arvel Hathcock
arvel.hathcock@...
Apr 23, 2007 11:47 pm
23
... errrr, reflect ... various reflectors? Right now, our reflector is verifying allman-01 and ietf-0.5. We will be changing to ietf-1.0 ASAP! -- Arvel...
Arvel Hathcock
arvel.hathcock@...
Apr 24, 2007 2:40 am
24
Hi Dave, ... Please add ours to the list. We support the -10 ietf draft only. .. Juan...
I've just pushed out a new version that adds canonicalization tracing and also fixes an issue verifying 'relaxed' headers if the signature is followed by a...
Hello. I have DKIM signing enabled on my Secure Computing Ironmail appliance. When sending test messages to the dkim.org reflector I get mixed results. When...
I have been noticing quite a few signature failures lately due to the g= value on the key not matching the local-part of the i= value in the signature. This...
I trying to implement DKIM within our email service. I'm receiving the result from the reflector: [DKIM-Sig: Warning] Null Signature. I try to modify several...
Hello everybody. I´m new in this group :) Yesterday i found a DKIM Proxy at http://demo.a- sit.at/it_sicherheit/dkim_proxy/index.html It works with Exchange...
RFC4871 – Section 3.7 The signer/verifier MUST compute two hashes, one over the body of the message and one over the selected header fields of the message. ...
I'll comment on a few things that jumped out to me... You might also be interested in the dkim-dev list, which (theoretically) is more oriented toward...
Hi Jason; Thanks for your email. I am a bit unclear between the content of b= and bh=. Suppose I have the following code fragment (I think it will give me the...
Hi Jason; Thanks for your email. I am a bit unclear between the content of b= and bh=. Suppose I have the following code fragment (I think it will give me the...
Hello, I'm testing my dkim signing implementation and the following body causes my test to fail -- the perl dkim-filter package says that messages generated...
Hi, all -- I am starting to work with DKIM headers, and I would like decode some existing DKIM headers (e.g., from gmail). Can anyone point me to a standalone...
Thanks, Matt -- A big help! BTW, for anyone reading this, the release version of dkim-filter requires that a key be already generated for your system. If not, ...
... Hey Jim, Sorry to hear about your reflector shutting down! It was a great service and its sad that a few bad apples have to spoil it for everyone. Thanks...
Hello, I'm also sorry because I used this service. If I can help you to bring it back, or some ideas for passing abuse I'll be glad. Here is a good service to...
bummer. will you be updating <http://testing.dkim.org/> to indicate that the reflector is now disabled? d/ ... -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking ...
Yes, I updated http://testing.dkim.org/reflector.html at the time I turned off the reflector. I'm going to poll a couple of the other reflector operators to...
... Jim, Yeah, I missed that. Sorry. I think my confusion came from the top of: <http://testing.dkim.org/> ... which seemed like it must still be running. d/ ...
I notice that all signatures from Yahoo and Facebook are failing, and mostly succeeding for other domains, including Gmail and Paypal. Not that I care that...
... We're seeing valid signatures from Yahoo! and Facebook (actually facebookmail.com). ... What do you mean by "inverse results"? It sounds like the test...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
