On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 03:27:22PM -0500, Randell Jesup wrote:

> It would. I actually tend to prefer a longword pattern to a
> character, but that's just me. While it's not a big issue anymore, I also
> have a preference for odd values, since on some processors odd addresses
> which are used for word accesses will fault (which is a good thing).

I did write a patch for this, and it was a context diff of about 10
lines :). Unfortunately I lost it whilst shuffling about dmalloc
versions. The current blank-char is 0xc5. I'd keep this the alloc
char. What should the 'freed' char be?

Gray, any reason you didn't do it this way?

m.

--
Programmer "I wrote a song about dental floss,
Loki Entertainment Software but did anyone's teeth get cleaner?"
http://lokigames.com/~briareos/ - Frank Zappa, re: the PMRC