>--- In energyresources@yahoogroups.com, "scottsworth" ><scottsworth@...> wrote:
>
> Ah well, thanks for calling me an idiot.

You're quite welcome. I am a firm believer in calling them as I see them. :)

>I do so enjoy being called names. Though I am not an eco-whacky >idiot. I am
actually in favor of developing nuclear energy.
>

You have a strange way of expressing it, there, sport.


>The reason I came to find this particular group many years ago was >due to
research I was doing on nuclear energy about 10 years ago, >particularly with
supply. I found that the disinformation plastered >out there on fissionable
material then was almost as bad as it is >now.

Ten years ago.... Wasn't Megatons to Megawatts just starting to distort the U
supply/demand market about then?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megatons_to_Megawatts_Program

Why look! Yes it was.

I suggest gently that your conclusions may be tainted, and perhaps you should
look again.

>
>Though now there is an even larger overstatement regarding >energy >resource
supply of pretty much everything. Seemingly to keep genious >supreme beings like
yourself happy and diluded about the bright >future for humanity. Go ahead,
please believe that there is an >endless supply of everything out there... and
when reserves do not >come out as stated, good luck to you and your belief on
this insane >system for resource overestimating that we have.
>

OH! You're not an ecowacky, you're a DOOMER. LOL! I should have known.

I will extend the same to you as I do to all DieOff fans:

You first.


> SNIP <

No use continuing to talk to you, Doomers are even more dead-set (get it?!) in
their religion than ecowackies. Have fun being depressed! :D