Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
epson-inkjet
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Copyright of Eiffel Tower Lighting   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #103332 of 103335 |
RE: Copyright of Eiffel Tower Lighting

FWIW . . .

I have been working with a photo consultant as I seek to launch my
business. She has a long history of success in "the business of the
business," and in the photo stock world, both in the US and abroad.

When we were reviewing my portfolio for images that I might license, she
advised me to pull the photograph of the Eiffel Tower at night. Per
Kathleen's response below, I was told that the lighting design was
copyrighted, and that any unauthorized use would be copyright infringement.

I think we need to be careful also that we are not assuming that French law
in this area is the same as American.

brian@...
917-653-5198
www.briangormanphoto.com


At 01:31 PM 6/15/02 -0500, you wrote:
>You cannot, at least in the U.S but I suspect it is also true elsewhere,
>copyright a public building, the way it is presented by the governmental
>owner to the public, or in many cases anything that is funded with public
>moneies where they are a significant portion of the funding and the main
>stimulus for the creation or production of the resulting product.
>
>In the case, for instance of, photographing in a public facility or park, it
>is not copyright issues which may prevent it but tresspassing issues which
>may prevent it in that not engaging in photogrpahy may be a condition of
>admission; but this does not prevent someone from photographing it from a
>public right of way like the street.
>
>In the case of lighting a monument, the creater of the lighting design may
>copyright the design itself but not the appearance of its display as it
>manifests itself from a public right of way. From the quote from the Tower
>web site, I am inclined to conclude that (a) the Tower may not be a
>publically owned monument but a privately owned and run facility, (b) the
>publication has to be in France or somewhere that the French laws have
>jurisdiction since not just taking the photograph at night is in question
>but the issue is publication and that might itself revolve around the nature
>of the publication (i.e., educational or non profit uses versus advertising
>and commercial uses versus editorial or news uses.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-epson-inkjet@...
>[mailto:owner-epson-inkjet@...]On Behalf Of Kathleen Wattle
>Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2002 2:02 AM
>To: epson-inkjet@...
>Subject: Copyright of Eiffel Tower Lighting
>
>
>Jerry Olsen wrote:
>"I doubt this would stand in any court in the free world.
>
>How can you copyright the lighting of a monument? "
>
>Answer: Because the lighting of the monument is an art, a creative work just
>as is theatre lighting - structured to display a creative interpretation of
>the subject, and as such the lighting itself is a unique work and subject to
>copyright protection as are other creative arts. The lighting process is not
>just "putting up some damn big lights" just as photography is not "just
>takin' pitchers".
>
>
>Kathleen Wattle
>
>
>
>Peter Tattersall wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday, June 13, 2002, at 04:53 PM, Jerry Olson wrote:
>>
>> > And there's nothing from stopping professional photographers from taking
>> > a photo of the tower at night, either. I'd be Damned if I'd pay anything
>> > to anybody to photograph a national monument! Not a dime! That's almost
>> > like Exxon claiming ownership of the sun and adding a $25 fee on your
>> > monthly utility bill.
>> >
>> > Jerry
>>
>> From the Official Eiffel Tower Website FAQ page (http://www.tour-
>> eiffel.fr/teiffel/uk/pratique/faq/index.html):
>>
>> "There are no restrictions on publishing a picture of the Tower by day.
>> Photos taken at night when the lights are aglow are subjected to
>> copyright laws, and fees for the right to publish must be paid to the
>> SNTE."
>
>Kathleen Wattle
>Captive Spirit Photography
> "Capturing the essence . . .
> for Business or Pleasure"
>www.captivespirit.com
>
>-
>Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
>subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
>
>-
>Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
>subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
>
-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.



Mon Jun 17, 2002 1:29 am

bgorman@...
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #103332 of 103335 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Jerry Olsen wrote: "I doubt this would stand in any court in the free world. How can you copyright the lighting of a monument? " Answer: Because the lighting...
Kathleen Wattle
captivespirit@...
Send Email
Jun 15, 2002
7:22 am

You cannot, at least in the U.S but I suspect it is also true elsewhere, copyright a public building, the way it is presented by the governmental owner to the...
Laurie Solomon
laurie@...
Send Email
Jun 15, 2002
8:10 pm

FWIW . . . I have been working with a photo consultant as I seek to launch my business. She has a long history of success in "the business of the business,"...
bgorman@...
Send Email
Jun 17, 2002
4:18 am

Ah, but what if the lighting you put up offends me? How dare you put up a lighting design That would do so? I'd sue ! That is probably the last thing on earth...
Jerry Olson
jerryolson@...
Send Email
Jun 16, 2002
12:41 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help