Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
erp4it · ERP for IT
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Catching up on my journals 2   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #742 of 795 |

Catching up on my journals 2

Harvard Business Review July-August 2008: "Investing in the IT That Makes a Competitive Difference" by McAfee & Brynjolfsson, is an interesting read, showing that turbulence and performance spread are much greater in high-IT industries, and containing a variety of interesting nuggest & case studies. Good discussion of IT governance and centralized vs. decentralized models. .

I particularly liked the Cisco and Otis process re-engineering, which showed a clear value chain, event-driven approach to BPM. Cisco wound up with the usual suspects: "market to sell, lead to order, quote to cash, issue to resolution, forecast to build, idea to product, and hire to retire," while Otis established "sales, order fulfillment, field installation, and job closing" processes.

I continue to search for the magic mix of IT-ERP processes, not too granular, not too grand. The portfolio lifecycles represent my current thinking. In pithy BPM-speak, they would be:

  • Inspire to retire (service lifecycle)
  • Require to retire (technology lifecycle)
  • Forecast to retire (asset lifecycle)
  • Identify to delete (information lifecycle)

One sobering tidbit was the apparent fragmentation of an application portfolio built on top of an ERP system at Cisco; this kind of thing is not supposed to happen, but my experience with ERP tools shows that it is all too possible.

Communications of the ACM July 2008 (51:7).  This latest, completely redsigned issue is the best one I have read today. They've done a terrific job restructuring it to include a variety of perspectives, from news to viewpoints to practice to hard research. This issue has a fascinating debate between Andriole and Roberts on the IT talent pipeline. Both make excellent points, Andriole from more of a corporate perspective, and Roberts providing a spirited rebuttal. Two practice articles on data management also worthwhile, "XML Fever" by Wilde/Glushko and "Beyond Relational Databases" by Seltzer. Wilde and Glushko point to a variety of XML pitfalls, from neophyte to advanced level, closing with some interesting perspectives on Semantic Web. Seltzer surprisingly doesn't mention Semantic Web (unless i missed it), but covers a variety of other active issues recently raised by Stonebraker among others. Finally, Tim Berners Lee and others propose a new "Web Science," and as noted previously anything with Berners-Lee is worth a read.

I'll be looking forward to my next issue of CACM; congrats to all on a redesign well done



Wed Jul 2, 2008 7:21 pm

alphas0ng
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #742 of 795 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Catching up on my journals 2 Harvard Business Review July-August 2008: "Investing in the IT That Makes a Competitive Difference" by McAfee & Brynjolfsson, is...
Charles Betz
alphas0ng
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2008
7:23 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help