------------------
CALL FOR PAPERS
EvoNUM2008
First European Workshop on Bio-inspired Algorithms for Continuous
Parameter Optimisation
incorporated in Evo* 2008
Napoli, Italy, 26-28 March 2008
__Introduction__
"The main application areas of EC techniques [in industry] are
multi-objective optimization, classification, data mining and
numerical optimization". [1]
Many engineering problems of both theoretical and practical interest
involve choosing the best configuration of a set of parameters to
achieve a specified objective. Numerical optimisation refers to the
case when these parameters take continuous real values, as opposed to
combinatorial optimisation, which deals with discrete values. Examples
include designing production processes for maximum efficiency, optimal
parameter adjustment for controllers and many others. EvoNUM focuses
on such problems.
We seek high quality papers involving the application of bio-inspired
algorithms (genetic algorithms, genetic programming, evolution
strategies, differential evolution, particle swarm optimization,
evolutionary programming, simulated annealing... and their hybrids) to
continuous optimisation problems in engineering. We also welcome
cross-fertilisation between Nature-inspired algorithms and more
classical numerical optimisation algorithms.
EvoNUM deals with engineering applications where continuous parameters
or functions have to be optimised, in fields such as control,
chemistry, agriculture, electricity, building and construction,
energy, aerospace engineering, design optimisation...
__Topics of Interest__
EvoNUM aims to cover areas that include but are not limited to:
- Local learning of parameters
- Mechanisms to incorporate constraints
- Theoretical developments
- Performance measures and performance analysis
- Benchmark problems [2]
The workshop will be part of Evo* 2008, a joint event which will
incorporate EuroGP 2008, the 11th European Conference on Genetic
Programming, EvoCOP 2008, the 8th European Conference on Evolutionary
Computation in Combinatorial Optimisation, EvoBIO 2008, the 6th
Conference on Evolutionary Bioinformatics, and EvoWorkshops 2008, a
set of ten thematic workshops on the theory and applications of
Evolutionary Computation.
__EvoNUM chairs__
Anna I Esparcia-Alcázar, Instituto Tecnológico de Informática, Spain
Anikó Ekárt, Aston University, United Kingdom
__EvoNUM Programme Committee__
Eva Alfaro, Instituto Tecnologico de Informatica, Spain,
Anne Auger, INRIA, France
Wolfgang Banzhaf, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada
Hans-Georg Beyer, FH Vorarlberg, Austria
Xavier Blasco, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Spain
Ying-ping Chen, National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan
Carlos Cotta, Universidad de Málaga, Spain,
Kalyanmoy Deb, Helsinki School of Economics, Finland
Marc Ebner, Universität Würzburg, Germany
Francisco Fernández, Universidad de Extremadura, Spain
Nikolaus Hansen, INRIA, France
W.B. Langdon, University of Essex, UK
JJ Merelo, Universidad de Granada, Spain
Boris Naujoks, University of Dortmund, Germany
Gabriela Ochoa, University of Nottingham, UK
Una-May O'Reilly, MIT, USA
Mike Preuss, University of Dortmund, Germany
Günter Rudolph, University of Dortmund, Germany
Marc Schoenauer, INRIA, France
P. N. Suganthan, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Ke Tang, University of Science and Technology of China, China
Darrell Whitley, Colorado State University, USA
__Submission details and additional information__
Submit your manuscript, at most 10 A4 pages long, in Springer LNCS
format (instructions are downloadable from:
http://www.springeronline.com/sgw/cda/frontpage/0,11855,5-164-2-72376-0,00.html)
using the online submission service no later than 1 November 2007.
The papers will be peer reviewed by at least two members of the
program committee. Authors will be notified via email on the results
of the review by 15 December 2007.
The authors of accepted papers may have to improve their paper on the
basis of the reviewers' comments and will be asked to send a camera
ready version of their manuscripts, including all source files (text
and images), by 8 January 2008. All accepted papers will appear in the
workshop proceedings, published in the Springer LNCS series, which
will be available at the workshop.
The authors of papers that receive the best reviews will be nominated
for the 'Best paper Award'.
__Important Dates__
Submission deadline: 1 November 2007
Notification of acceptance: 15 December 2007 Camera ready papers due:
8 January 2008
Workshop: 26-28 March 2008
__Web Addresses__
Conference web page
http://www.evostar.org
Workshop web page
http://evostar.iti.upv.es/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=51&Itemid\
=55
-------------------
[1] GS Hornby & T Yu, "EC Practitioners: Results of the First Survey",
SIGEVOlution, Newsletter of the ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic
and Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 2(1), Spring 2007 www.sigevolution.org
[2] Authors are also invited to submit their best algorithms to
http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/ecb/
CALL FOR PAPERS
EvoTHEORY 2008
First European Workshop on Theoretical Aspects of Artificial Evolution
26-28 March, 2008, Naples, Italy
http://www.evostar.org/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
INTRODUCTION
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is a central goal of theoretical investigations of evolutionary
algorithms to assist practitioners with the tasks of selecting and
designing good strategy variants and operators. Due to the rapid
pace at which new strategy variants and operators are being
proposed, theoretical foundations of evolutionary algorithms still
lag behind practice. However, theoretical studies have gained much
momentum over the last few years and have made numerous valuable
contributions to the field of evolutionary computation.
The aim of this workshop is to find common ground among the
multitude of theoretical approaches and identify open questions
central to the field as a whole.
The workshop will be held from 26-28 March, 2008 in Naples,
Italy, as part of the EvoStar event.
Accepted papers will be presented orally at the workshop and
included in the EvoWorkshops proceedings, published by Springer
Verlag in the Lecture Notes in Computer Science series.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOPICS OF INTEREST
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The theory of evolutionary algorithms today consists of a wide
range of different approaches. Run-time analysis, schema theory,
analysis of the dynamics of artificial evolution, and systematic
empirical analysis all consider different aspects of bio-inspired
algorithms behaviour.
Moreover, they employ different methods and tools for attaining
their goals, such as Markov chains, randomized algorithms,
infinite population models, or ideas based on statistical
mechanics or population dynamics. All aspects of analysis are of
interest, including but not limited to: population dynamics,
run-time analysis, fitness landscapes and problem difficulty,
genetic operator design, genetic repair principles, self-adaptive
parameters, multi-objective problems.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND SUBMISSION DETAILS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submit your manuscript, at most 10 A4 pages long, in Springer
LNCS format (instructions downloadable from
http://www.springeronline.com/sgw/cda/frontpage/0,11855,5-164-2-72376
-0,00.html)
no later than November 1, 2007.
The papers will be peer reviewed by at least three members of
the program committee. Authors will be notified via email on the
results of the review by December 15, 2007.
The authors of accepted papers will have to improve their paper
on the basis of the reviewers' comments and will be asked to
send a camera ready version of their manuscripts, along with
text sources and pictures, by January 8, 2008. The accepted
papers will appear in the workshop proceedings, published in
Springer LNCS Series, which will be available at the workshop.
Further information, including the Online Submission Details,
can be found in
http://www.evostar.org
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
IMPORTANT DATES
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submission: 1 November 2007
Notification: 15 December 2007
Camera ready: 8 January 2008
Workshop: 26-28 March 2008
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
WORKSHOP CHAIRS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mario Giacobini
Department of Animal Production Epidemiology and Ecology
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
and Computational Biology Unit
Molecular Biotechnology Center
University of Torino, Italy
Jonathan Rowe
School of Computer Science
University of Birmingham
Birmingham, UK
(Apologies for multiple posting)
**************** CALL FOR PAPERS ****************
EvoPhD 2008
Third European Graduate Student Workshop on
Evolutionary Computation
Naples, Italy, 26-28 March 2008
This is the third European workshop on evolutionary
computation that focuses on work of PhD students.
Its main aim is to give students feedback on the
current state of their thesis. This workshop provides
a chance to students to present their work to a friendly
audience of other students as well as experts in the
field. It also provides students with contacts and
professional networking opportunities, which helps
them to integrate into the community.
For you as a student, the aim of a submission is to
get feedback on the current state of your thesis.
Submissions will be evaluated by members of a
high-quality committee that consists of long running
members of the community with the goal to provide
in-depth feedback. You are required to submit a paper
that summarizes the research performed and planned as
part of your dissertation.
The number of participants is limited. Accepted papers
will not be published in a proceedings, but will be
disseminated among the participants of the event.
The workshop is part of Evo*2008, which combined form
Europe's premier co-located events in the field of
evolutionary computing. The next event takes place in
Naples, Italy. Featuring the latest in theoretical
and applied research, the topics include recent genetic
programming challenges, evolutionary and other meta-heuristic
approaches for combinatorial optimization, evolutionary
algorithms in the biosciences, in music and art domains, in
image analysis and signal processing systems, in hardware
optimisation and as applied to a range of industrial and
financial optimisation problems.
Web address: http://www.evostar.org
Topics include, but are not limited to,
* Any topic that fits in the scope of the conferences and
workshops
* Bio-inspired computing, such as evolutionary computing,
ant colony optimization, swarm intelligence, and neural
networks
* Local optimisation methods (tabu search, simulated annealing)
* All flavours of evolutionary computation (genetic programming,
evolution strategies, genetic algorithms, memetic algorithms, etc.)
* Combinatorial optimisation with bio-inspired computing
* Application of evolutionary computation to real-life problems
* Hybrid architectures that include bio-inspired components
* Theory on a relevant area of bio-inspired computing
Submission Information
The deadline for submission is 22 December 2007.
Authors will be notified of acceptance on 1 February 2008.
Camera-ready version of accepted paper due on 29 February 2008.
The page limit is 12 A4 pages in Springer LCNS format.
Submissions should be e-mailed in PDF or gzipped postscript to
evophd (at) vanhemert.co.uk
* Please read the formatting and content guidelines on the web page. *
Organising Committee
Program Chairs
Jano van Hemert
jano (at) vanhemert.co.uk
University of Edinburgh, UK
Mario Giacobini
mario.giacobini (at) unito.it
University of Torino, Italy
Cecilia Di Chio
cdichi (at) essex.ac.uk
University of Essex, UK
Local Chair
Ivanoe De Falco
ivanoe.defalco (at) na.icar.cnr.it
ICAR-CNR, Italy
Publicity Chair
Anna Esparcia
aesparcia (at) iti.upv.es
Instituto Tecnologico de Informatica, Valencia, Spain
[Apologies for multiple postings]
-----------------------------------------------------------
CONFERENCE ANNOUNCEMENT
Evo* 2008
26-28 March 2008
Napoli, Italy
www.evostar.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
Evo* - The main European events on Evolutionary Computation
Evo* joins the Europe's premier co-located events in the field of
evolutionary computing, namely the EuroGP, EvoCOP and EvoBIO
conferences and workshops collectively entitled EvoWorkshops. The
2008 event will take place in Naples/Napoli, Italy. Featuring the
latest in theoretical and applied research, the topics will include
recent genetic programming challenges, evolutionary and other meta-
heuristic approaches for combinatorial optimisation, evolutionary
algorithms in the biosciences, in music and art domains, in image
analysis and signal processing systems, in hardware optimisation and
as applied to a range of industrial and financial optimisation
problems.
EuroGP 2008
Eleventh European Conference on Genetic Programming
EvoCOP 2008
Eighth European Conference on Evolutionary Computation
in Combinatorial Optimisation
EvoBIO 2008
Sixth European Conference on Evolutionary Computation,
Machine Learning and Data Mining in Bioinformatics
EvoWorkshops 2008
European Workshops on the Theory and Applications of
Evolutionary Computation
EvoCOMNET
Fifth European Workshop on the Application of Nature-
inspired Techniques to Telecommunication Networks and
other Connected Systems
EvoFIN
Second European Workshop on Evolutionary Computation
in Finance and Economics
EvoHOT
Fourth European Workshop on Bio-Inspired Heuristics
for Design Automation
EvoIASP
Tenth Workshop on Evolutionary Computation in Image
Analysis and Signal Processing
EvoMUSART
Sixth European Workshop on Evolutionary and
Biologically Inspired Music, Sound, Art and Design
EvoNUM
First European Workshop on Bio-inspired algorithms
for continuous parameter optimisation
EvoPhD
Third European Graduate Student Workshop on
Evolutionary Computation
EvoSTOC
Fifth European Workshop on Evolutionary Algorithms in
Stochastic and Dynamic Environments
EvoTHEORY -
First European Workshop on Theoretical Aspects in
Artificial Evolution
EvoTransLog
Second European Workshop on Evolutionary Computation
in Transportation and Logistics
Proceedings will be published as part of Springer's Lecture Notes in
Computer Science series.
Important dates
* Submission deadline: 1 November 2007
* Events: 26-28 March 2008
Information on specific events will be publicised shortly.
Evo* website: www.evostar.org
Evo* poster
You can download the Evo* poster advertisement in PDF format
from http://cas.iti.upv.es/evostar2008/evostar2008poster.pdf
Local Organising Committee
Ivanoe De Falco, ICAR-CNR, Italy
Antonio Della Cioppa, University of Salerno, Italy
Ernesto Tarantino, ICAR-CNR, Italy
Giuseppe Trautteur, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
Evo* Coordinator and Administrative Contact
Jennifer Willies, School of Computing, Napier University, Scotland,
UK
Publicity Chair
Anna Esparcia, Instituto Tecnologico de Informatica, Spain
Model of an Internal Evolutionary Mechanism (based on an
extension to homeostasis) linking Adaptive Mutations to the Baldwin
Effect:
http://members.aol.com/jorolat/index.html
i am new member of ur group.i am a student. i proposed an hypothesis to explain the mechanism of evolutionary process.can i mail to u as i can paste it on web &to know the remarks on my hypothesis.
thanking u
kutumbarao.n.h.v
Find out what India is talking about on - Yahoo! Answers India Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Yahoo! Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW
New research has provided evidence for 'environmental inheritance',
a radical theory of transgenerational genetic adaptation proposed by
Professor Marcus Pembrey of the Institute of Child Health, UCL in the
mid 1990's
The latest evidence challenges accepted thinking on
genetic inheritance, suggesting that historic events can contribute to
some common modern illnesses.
The research, published by the
Children of the 90s study based at the University of Bristol in
collaboration with Umea University, Sweden, could have far-reaching
implications for our understanding of modern health epidemics - such as
obesity or cardiovascular disease.
Conventionally scientists
believe that how we develop as adults depends on two factors - the
genes (DNA) we inherit from our parents, and the environmental
influences, such as diet, lifestyle, exposure to pollution from
conception onwards.
Professor Marcus Pembrey, who is also head of
Genetics at Children of the 90s, says that over the long term, the
process of Darwinian evolution by random errors in DNA followed by
natural selection ensures that the human race adapts to changes in our
environment. But it takes very many generations.
Now there is
evidence for another mechanism which no-one had considered... some of
the father's own experiences in his childhood are captured in some way
by his sperm, so affecting the genes that he bequeaths to his
descendants.
Model of an Internal Evolutionary Mechanism (based on an extension to homeostasis) linking Adaptive Mutations to the Baldwin Effect:
http://members.aol.com/jorolat/index.html
Gainesville, Florida: - Performance on the dance floor may notalways show it, but people are rarely born with two left feet. We havegenes that instruct our arms and legs to grow in the right places andpoint in the right directions. They also provide for the spaces betweenour fingers and toes and every other formative detail of our limbs.
Evolutionarilyspeaking, the genetic instructions used to construct and position ourlimbs were being perfected more than half a billion years ago infishes, not along the sides of the body where the fins that precededhuman arms and legs sprouted, but at the midline that runs along thebackbone and belly.
This midline - think of the dorsal, tail andanal fins of a fish - is where the genetic template to produce finsoriginated, about 100 million years before paired fins evolved andabout 200 million years before paired fins evolved into limbs,according to University of Florida genetics researchers. The findings,published online today in the journal Nature, also provide insight intothe evolutionary history of genes involved in human birth defects.[evolution, origin]
[The Nature paper is currently available here but the link won't work for long because it's an advance publication - email if you have any problems.]
Model of an Internal Evolutionary Mechanism (based on an extension to homeostasis) linking Adaptive Mutations to the Baldwin Effect: http://members.aol.com/jorolat/index.html
--- In evomech@yahoogroups.com, "John Latter" <jorolat@...> wrote: > > > --- In evomech@yahoogroups.com, "jorolat" jorolat@a... wrote: > > > > [Gould & Lewontin, Royal Society of London, '78] > > > > Abstract: > > > > "An adaptationist programme has dominated evolutionary thought in > > england and the United States during the past forty years. It is > > based on faith in the power of natural selection as an optimizing > > agent. It proceeds by breaking an organism into unitary "traits" and > > proposing an adaptive story for each considered separately. Trade- > > offs among competing selective demands exert the only brake upon > > perfection; nonoptimality is thereby rendered as a result of > > adaptation as well. We criticize this approach and attempt to > > reassert a competing notion (long popular in continental Europe) that > > organisms must be analyzed as integrated wholes, with baupläne so > > constrained by phyletic heritage, pathways of development, and > > general architecture that the constraints themselves become more > > interesting and more important in delimiting pathways of change than > > the selective force that may mediate change when it occurs. We fault > > the adaptationist programme for its failure to distinguish current > > utility from reasons for origin (male tyrannosaurs may have used > > their diminutive front legs to titillate female partners, but this > > will not explain why they got so small); for its unwillingness to > > consider alternatives to adaptive stories; for its reliance upon > > plausibility alone as a criterion for accepting speculative tales; > > and for its failure to consider adequately such competing themes as > > random fixation of alleles, production of nonadaptive structures by > > developmental correlation with selected features (allometry, > > pleiotropy, material compensation, mechanically forced correlation), > > the separability of adaptation and selection, multiple adaptive > > peaks, and current utility as an epiphenomenon of nonadaptive > > structures. We support Darwin's own pluralistic approach to > > identifying the agents of evolutionary change." > > > > Full text at: > > > > http://www.aaas.org/spp/dser/evolution/science/spandrel.htm > > > > [Bookmarked] > > > > Jorolat > > Now available at: > > http://www.aaas.org/spp/dser/evolution/history/spandrel.shtml > > John > -- Model of an Internal Evolutionary Mechanism (based on an extension to homeostasis) linking Adaptive Mutations to the Baldwin Effect: > http://members.aol.com/jorolat/index.html Evolution: Where Darwin meets Lamarck? Discussion Forum: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/evomech/ >
--- In evomech@yahoogroups.com, "alexbertoglio" <alexbertoglio@...> wrote: > > I have searched the internet, talkorigins, Baldwinian explanations, > and the post archive here and been unable to find a good explanation > of how instincts (not reflexes) originate. > > My dad is reading the book "Improbable" by Adam Fawer, and apparently > it makes a case for a "shared consciousness" to explain instincts that > are not coded for in DNA. I have tried to explain the Baldwinian > effect to him but I cannot explain how exactly the DNA itself passes > instincts. > > According to the book, Biologists have been unable to explain how > babies have the instinct (or skills) to walk, without ever seeing > walking in action. > > I plan on reading "Improbable" to find out exactly what it says, but > can anyone explain how instincts are formed? > > And can anyone explain why the concept of "shared consciousness" is > used in this regard? I havn't read the book yet, but apparently the > point is that some things that don't pass by DNA are instead contained > in everyone, in some meta-physical sense. I don't buy it, but maybe > someone with more education in meta-physics can explain it better. >
Hi Alex,
Perhaps someone more knowledgeable than I could give you anexplanation in terms of conventional theory but I doubt one exists.
Personally, I'm interested in the possibility of an homeostaicinternal evolutionary mechanism. The phenomena of instinct issupportive of this proposal but a coherent explanation from thisperspective is a bit further down the line at the moment.
I'm slightly intrigued by what 'shared conciousness' may mean althoughI'm not particularly interested in anything that can't be tested.
I have searched the internet, talkorigins, Baldwinian explanations,
and the post archive here and been unable to find a good explanation
of how instincts (not reflexes) originate.
My dad is reading the book "Improbable" by Adam Fawer, and apparently
it makes a case for a "shared consciousness" to explain instincts that
are not coded for in DNA. I have tried to explain the Baldwinian
effect to him but I cannot explain how exactly the DNA itself passes
instincts.
According to the book, Biologists have been unable to explain how
babies have the instinct (or skills) to walk, without ever seeing
walking in action.
I plan on reading "Improbable" to find out exactly what it says, but
can anyone explain how instincts are formed?
And can anyone explain why the concept of "shared consciousness" is
used in this regard? I havn't read the book yet, but apparently the
point is that some things that don't pass by DNA are instead contained
in everyone, in some meta-physical sense. I don't buy it, but maybe
someone with more education in meta-physics can explain it better.
Heylighen F. (1989): "Self-Organization, Emergence and the
Architecture of Complexity", in:
Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on System Science, (AFCET,
Paris), p. 23-32.
Abstract:
It is argued that the problems of emergence and the architecture of
complexity can be solved by analysing the self-organizing evolution of
complex systems. A generalized, distributed variation selection model
is proposed, in which internal and external aspects of selection and
variation are contrasted. "Relational closure" is introduced as an
internal selection criterion. A possible application of the theory in
the form of a pattern directed computer system for supporting complex
problem-solving is sketched.
On 19/03/2006 johnhewitt22 wrote: > Dear All,
>
> I have never seen this book, by Phillip E. Johnson, but I have to
say
> that, at a cursory reading, it seems rather good.
>
> Perhaps we could have an update on the author. Who is he? What is
the
> backgound of the e-book?
>
> Sincerely
>
> John Hewitt
Hi John,
The last I heard of Johnson he was an IDist law professor at Berkeley.
Here are a couple of links:
I first came across Johnson in my search for more information about
Grasse:
"MY STARTING POINT is a book review that Theodosius Dobzhansky
published
in 1975, critiquing Pierre Grasse's The Evolution of Life.{1} Grasse,
an eminent French zoologist, believed in something that he called
"evolution." So did Dobzhansky, but when Dobzhansky used that term he
meant neo-Darwinism, evolution propelled by random mutation and guided
by natural selection. Grasse used the same term to refer to something
very different, a poorly understood process of transformation in which
one general category (like reptiles) gave rise to another (like
mammals), guided by mysterious "internal factors" that seemed to
compel
many individual lines of descent to converge at a new form of life."
Dear All,
I have never seen this book, by Phillip E. Johnson, but I have to say
that, at a cursory reading, it seems rather good.
Perhaps we could have an update on the author. Who is he? What is the
backgound of the e-book?
Sincerely
John Hewitt
Genetics, Vol. 163, 1483-1496, April 2003, Copyright 2003
Regulating General Mutation Rates: Examination of the Hypermutable
State Model for Cairnsian Adaptive Mutation
John R. Rotha, Eric Kofoid, Frederick P. Roth, Otto G. Bergc, Jon
Segera, and Dan I. Andersson
Abstract:
In the lac adaptive mutation system of Cairns, selected mutant
colonies but not unselected mutant types appear to arise from a
nongrowing population of Escherichia coli. The general mutagenesis
suffered by the selected mutants has been interpreted as support for
the idea that E. coli possesses an evolved (and therefore beneficial)
mechanism that increases the mutation rate in response to stress (the
hypermutable state model, HSM). This mechanism is proposed to allow
faster genetic adaptation to stressful conditions and to explain why
mutations appear directed to useful sites. Analysis of the HSM reveals
that it requires implausibly intense mutagenesis (105 times the
unselected rate) and even then cannot account for the behavior of the
Cairns system. The assumptions of the HSM predict that selected
revertants will carry an average of eight deleterious null mutations
and thus seem unlikely to be successful in long-term evolution. The
experimentally observed 35-fold increase in the level of general
mutagenesis cannot account for even one Lac+ revertant from a
mutagenized subpopulation of 105 cells (the number proposed to enter
the hypermutable state). We conclude that temporary general mutagenesis
during stress is unlikely to provide a long-term selective advantage in
this or any similar genetic system.
LIBRARY OF THE FUTURE (R) Series Third Edition Ver. 4.3
Darwin on Trial Johnson, Phillip E
----------------------------------------------------------
1991
DARWIN ON TRIAL
by Phillip E. Johnson
(C) Copyright 1991, Phillip E. Johnson
Used with permission of Phillip E. Johnson and
Regnery Gateway Publishing Co.
Electronically Enhanced Text (c) Copyright 1993 World Library, Inc.
CONTENTS
CONTENTS
-
Chapter One: The Legal Setting
Chapter Two: Natural Selection
As a Tautology
As a Scientific Hypothesis
As a Deductive Argument
As a Philosophical Necessity
Chapter Three: Mutations Great and Small
Chapter Four: The Fossil Problem
Chapter Five: The Fact of Evolution
Chapter Six: The Vertebrate Sequence
Fish to Amphibians
Amphibians to Reptiles
Reptiles to Mammals
Reptile to Bird
From Apes to Humans
Chapter Seven: The Molecular Evidence
Chapter Eight: Prebiological Evolution
Chapter Nine: The Rules of Science
Chapter Ten: Darwinist Religion
Chapter Eleven: Darwinist Education
Chapter Twelve: Science and Pseudoscience
Research Notes
BERKELEY, CA - Evolutionary paths to new therapeutic drugs, as well as
a wide assortment of other enzyme products, have been created through,
of all things, intelligent design. A team of researchers with the
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) and the University
of California at Berkeley have developed a technique in which the
evolution of an important class of proteins is steered towards a
desired outcome.
"We've taken enzymes that are promiscuous, meaning they have the
capacity to evolve along many different functional lines, and trained
them to become specialists," said chemical engineer Jay Keasling, who
led this study.
American Zoologist: Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 552 - 563.
Function and the Evolution of Phenotypic Stability: Connecting
Pattern to Process
Kurt Schwenk and Gunter P. Wagner
Abstract:
Phenotypes manifest a balance between the inherited tendency to
remain the same (phenotypic stability) and the tendency to change in
response to current environmental conditions (adaptation). This paper
explores the role of functional integration and functional trade-offs
in generating phenotypic stability by limiting the responses of
individual characters to environmental selection. Evolutionarily stable
configurations (ESCs) are systems of functionally interacting
characters within which characters are 'judged' by their contribution
to system-level functionality. This 'internal' component of selection
differs from traditional 'external' selection in that it travels with
the organism wherever it goes and is maintained across a wide range of
environments. External selection, in contrast, is by definition
environment-dependent. The temporal and geographic constancy of
internal selection therefore acts to maintain phenotypic stability even
as environments change. Functional trade-offs occur when one character
participates in more than one function, but can only be optimized for
one. Participation of certain ('keystone') characters in a trade-off
potentially causes stabilization of an entire system owing to a cascade
of functional dependencies on that character. Phylogenetic character
analysis is an essential part of elucidating these processes, but
patterns cannot be used as prima facie evidence of particular processes.
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 981:61-81 (2002)
2002 New York Academy of Sciences
From Epigenesis to Epigenetics
The Case of C. H. Waddington
Linda Van Speybroeck
Abstract:
One continuous thread in this volume is the name of Conrad H.
Waddington (1905-1975), the developmental biologist known as the
inventor of the term epigenetics. After some biographical notes on his
life, this article explores the meaning of the Waddingtonian equation
and the context wherein it was developed. This equation holds that
epigenesis + genetics = epigenetics, and refers in retrospect to the
debate on epigenesis versus preformationism in neoclassical embryology.
Whereas Waddington actualized this debate by linking epigenesis to
developmental biology and preformation to genetics, thereby stressing
the importance of genetic action in causal embryology, today's
epigenetics more and more offers the possibility to enfeeble biological
thinking in terms of genes only, as it expands the gene-centric view in
biology by introducing a flexible and pragmatically oriented hierarchy
of crucial genomic contexts that go beyond the organism.
"The Return of Hopeful Monsters" Natural History
magazine 86
(June 1976): 24, 30.
Big Brother, the tyrant
of George Orwell's 1984,
directed his daily Two Minutes Hate against Emmanuel Goldstein, enemy
of the people. When I studied evolutionary biology in graduate school
during the mid-1960s, official rebuke and derision focused upon Richard
Goldschmidt, a famous geneticist who, we were told, had gone astray.
Although 1984 creeps up on us, I trust that the world will not be in
Big Brother's grip by then. I do, however, predict that during this
decade Goldschmidt will be largely vindicated in the world of
evolutionary biology.
Goldschmidt,
a Jewish refugee from Hitler's decimation of German science, spent the
remainder of his career at Berkeley, where he died in 1958. His views
on evolution ran afoul of the great neo-Darwinian synthesis forged
during the 1930s and 1940s and continuing today as a reigning, if
insecure, orthodoxy. Contemporary neo-Darwinism is often called the
"synthetic theory of evolution" because it united the theories of
population genetics with the classical observations of morphology,
systematics, embryology, biogeography, and paleontology.
The
core of this synthetic theory restates the two most characteristic
assertions of Darwin himself: first, that evolution is a two-stage
process (random variation as raw material, natural selection as a
directing force); secondly, that evolutionary change is generally slow,
steady, gradual, and continuous.
Several phases of animal evolution have undergone radical change in
developmental mechanisms. I refer to these as major transitions in
animal evolution. The six most important transitions in the lineage
leading to humans are proposed to be: the origin of multicellularity,
the origin of two-germ layers and radial symmetry, the origin of
three-germ layers and bilateral symmetry, dorsoventral axis inversion,
the origin of vertebrates, the origin of gnathostomes. Here I discuss
the genetic changes that may have underlain these transitions. The last
two transitions were accompanied by, and possibly facilitated by, large
increases in gene number. This probably occurred by tetraploidy, with
some of the duplicate genes being subsequently lost. The origin of
three germ-layers, bilateral symmetry and a through gut also probably
involved gene duplication; in this case, duplication of an ancestral
ProtoHox gene cluster to yield two paralogous homeobox gene clusters,
Hox and ParaHox, with roles in patterning different germ layers along
the anteroposterior body axis. This event may provide a partial genetic
explanation for the Cambrian explosion.
Pigliucci, M. (2004) Natural selection and its limits: Where
ecology meets evolution. In: Casagrandi, R. & Melià, P.
(Eds.) Ecologia. Atti del XIII Congresso Nazionale della Società
Italiana di Ecologia (Como, 8-10 settembre 2003).
Aracne, Roma, p. 29-34.
Abstract:
Natural selection [Darwin 1859] is perhaps the most important component
of evolutionary theory, since it is the only known process that can
bring about the adaptation of living organisms to their environments
[Gould 2002]. And yet, its study is conceptually and methodologically
complex, and much
attention needs to be paid to a variety of phenomena that can limit the
efficacy of selection [Antonovics
1976; Pigliucci and Kaplan 2000]. In this essay, I will use examples of
recent work carried out in my
laboratory to illustrate basic research on natural selection as
conducted using a variety of approaches,
including field work, laboratory experiments, and molecular genetics. I
also discuss the application of this
array of tools to questions pertinent to conservation biology, and in
particular to the all-important problem of
what makes invasive species so good at creating the sort of problems
they are infamous for [Lee 2002].
1) Separation of Man and Ape Down to Gene Expression
Humans and chimpanzees have in common more than 98 percent of DNA and
99 percent of genes. Yet, in looks and behavior we are very different
from them. For more than 30 years--well before either the human or
chimpanzee genome had been sequenced--scientists have speculated that
this might be due to the way that the common genes express themselves
rather than differences in the genes themselves. A new comparison
published in Nature seems to prove that theory.
2) Expression profiling in primates reveals a rapid evolution of
human transcription factors
[Gilad et al, Nature, March '06]
Although it has been hypothesized for thirty years that many human
adaptations are likely to be due to changes in gene regulation1, almost
nothing is known about the modes of natural selection acting on
regulation in primates. Here we identify a set of genes for which
expression is evolving under natural selection. We use a new
multi-species complementary DNA array to compare steady-state messenger
RNA levels in liver tissues within and between humans, chimpanzees,
orangutans and rhesus macaques. Using estimates from a linear mixed
model, we identify a set of genes for which expression levels have
remained constant across the entire phylogeny (approx70 million years),
and are therefore likely to be under stabilizing selection. Among the
top candidates are five genes with expression levels that have
previously been shown to be altered in liver carcinoma. We also find a
number of genes with similar expression levels among non-human primates
but significantly elevated or reduced expression in the human lineage,
features that point to the action of directional selection. Among the
gene set with a human-specific increase in expression, there is an
excess of transcription factors; the same is not true for genes with
increased expression in chimpanzee.
Differentiation of multicellular organisms is controlled by
epigenetic
markers transmitted through cell division. Many of the systems that
encode these markers exist also in unicellulars, but in unicellulars
these systems do not control differentiation. Thus during the evolution
of multicellularity, epigenetic inheritance systems were exapted for
their current use in differentiation. During this transition there must
have been stages at which epigenetic information passed between
generations to an even larger extent than it does now. We show that
this can lead to the evolution of cells that do not contribute to the
progeny of the organism, and thus to a germline-soma distinction. This
hints that an intrinsic instability during a transition from
unicellulars to multicellulars may be the reason wide spread of the
evolution of germ line.
--- In evomech@yahoogroups.com, "John Latter" <jorolat@...> wrote: > > [Weng, Bhalla, & Iyengar , Science, Apr '99] > > > Introduction: > > "Biological signaling pathways interact with one another to form > complex networks. Complexity arises from the large number of > components, many with isoforms that have partially overlapping > functions; from the connections among components; and from the > spatial relationship between components. The origins of the complex > behavior of signaling networks and analytical approaches to deal with > the emergent complexity are discussed here." > > Full text (PDF file) at: > > http://www.csc.liv.ac.uk/~m1pk/Projects/bhalla%202.pdf > (begins halfway down the first page) > > > Jorolat
Since the discovery of the double helical structure of DNA, the
standard account of the
inheritance of features has been in terms of DNA-copying and
DNA-transmission. This theory is
just a version of the old theory according to which the inheritance of
features is explained by the
transfer at conception of some developmentally privileged material from
parents to offspring. This
paper does the following things: (1) it explains what the inheritance
of features is; (2) it explains
how the DNA-centric theory emerged; (3) it clarifies the relation
between the DNA-centric theory
and the ‘unfolding’ theory of development; (4) it argues that (given
what we now know about
developmental processes and genetic activity) the DNA-centric theory
should be abandoned in
favour of a pluralistic (but not holistic) theory of the inheritance of
features. According to this
pluralistic theory, the reliable reoccurrence of phenotypes must be
explained by appealing not only
to processes responsible for the reliable reoccurrence of genetic
developmental factors but also to
processes responsible for the reliable reoccurrence (or persistence) of
nongenetic environmental factors.
Kansas City, Mo. (March 6, 2006) - Jacqueline Kim Dale, Ph.D.,
formerly a Senior Research Associate at the Stowers Institute for
Medical Research, and Olivier Pourquie, Ph.D., Stowers Institute
Investigator and an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical
Institute, have demonstrated that the long-studied family of
transcription factors called Snail is expressed in a cyclic fashion
during the formation of the vertebral precursors in the mouse and chick
embryo.
The findings, which were published in the March 7 issue of
Developmental Cell, indicate that the genes governing many cellular
properties are downstream of the segmentation clock, the mechanism that
controls the formation of the vertebral column.
Gabora,
L. & Aerts, D. (2005). Evolution as context-driven actualization of
potential: Toward an interdisciplinary theory of change of state. Interdisciplinary
Science Reviews, 30(1), 69-88.
Abstract:
It is increasingly evident that there is more to biological evolution
than natural selection; moreover, the concept of evolution is not
limited to biology. We propose an integrative framework for
characterizing how entities evolve, in which evolution is viewed as a
process of context-driven actualization of potential (CAP). Processes
of change differ according to the degree of nondeterminism, and the
degree to which they are sensitive to, internalize, and depend upon a
particular context. The approach enables us to embed phenomena across
disciplines into a broad conceptual framework. We give examples of
insights into physics, biology, culture and cognition that derive from
this unifying framework.