Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
evomech · Evolution: Where Darwin meets Lamarck?
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 573 - 603 of 604   Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Messages: Show Message Summaries   (Group by Topic) Sort by Date v  
#603 From: "Anna Esparcia" <anna@...>
Date: Wed Oct 3, 2007 10:57 am
Subject: CFP- EvoNUM2008 - Bio-inspired Algorithms for Continuous Parameter Optimisation
aiesparcia
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
------------------

CALL FOR PAPERS


EvoNUM2008

First European Workshop on Bio-inspired Algorithms for Continuous
Parameter Optimisation

incorporated in Evo* 2008

Napoli, Italy, 26-28 March 2008


__Introduction__

"The main application areas of EC techniques [in industry] are
multi-objective optimization, classification, data mining and
numerical optimization". [1]

Many engineering problems of both theoretical and practical interest
involve choosing the best configuration of a set of parameters to
achieve a specified objective. Numerical optimisation refers to the
case when these parameters take continuous real values, as opposed to
combinatorial optimisation, which deals with discrete values. Examples
include designing production processes for maximum efficiency, optimal
parameter adjustment for controllers and many others. EvoNUM focuses
on such problems.

We seek high quality papers involving the application of bio-inspired
algorithms (genetic algorithms, genetic programming, evolution
strategies, differential evolution, particle swarm optimization,
evolutionary programming, simulated annealing... and their hybrids) to
continuous optimisation problems in engineering. We also welcome
cross-fertilisation between Nature-inspired algorithms and more
classical numerical optimisation algorithms.

EvoNUM deals with engineering applications where continuous parameters
or functions have to be optimised, in fields such as control,
chemistry, agriculture, electricity, building and construction,
energy, aerospace engineering, design optimisation...

__Topics of Interest__

EvoNUM aims to cover areas that include but are not limited to:

-     Local learning of parameters
-     Mechanisms to incorporate constraints
-     Theoretical developments
-     Performance measures and performance analysis
-     Benchmark problems [2]


The workshop will be part of Evo* 2008, a joint event which will
incorporate EuroGP 2008, the 11th European Conference on Genetic
Programming, EvoCOP 2008, the 8th European Conference on Evolutionary
Computation in Combinatorial Optimisation, EvoBIO 2008, the 6th
Conference on Evolutionary Bioinformatics, and EvoWorkshops 2008, a
set of ten thematic workshops on the theory and applications of
Evolutionary Computation.


__EvoNUM chairs__

    Anna I Esparcia-Alcázar, Instituto Tecnológico de Informática, Spain
    Anikó Ekárt, Aston University, United Kingdom

__EvoNUM Programme Committee__

    Eva Alfaro, Instituto Tecnologico de Informatica, Spain,
    Anne Auger, INRIA, France
    Wolfgang Banzhaf, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada
    Hans-Georg Beyer, FH Vorarlberg, Austria
    Xavier Blasco, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Spain
    Ying-ping Chen, National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan
    Carlos Cotta, Universidad de Málaga, Spain,
    Kalyanmoy Deb, Helsinki School of Economics, Finland
    Marc Ebner, Universität Würzburg, Germany
    Francisco Fernández, Universidad de Extremadura, Spain
    Nikolaus Hansen, INRIA, France
    W.B. Langdon, University of Essex, UK
    JJ Merelo, Universidad de Granada, Spain
    Boris Naujoks, University of Dortmund, Germany
    Gabriela Ochoa, University of Nottingham, UK
    Una-May O'Reilly, MIT, USA
    Mike Preuss, University of Dortmund, Germany
    Günter Rudolph, University of Dortmund, Germany
    Marc Schoenauer, INRIA, France
    P. N. Suganthan, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
    Ke Tang, University of Science and Technology of China, China
    Darrell Whitley, Colorado State University, USA


__Submission details and additional information__


Submit your manuscript, at most 10 A4 pages long, in Springer LNCS
format (instructions are downloadable from:

http://www.springeronline.com/sgw/cda/frontpage/0,11855,5-164-2-72376-0,00.html)
using the online submission service no later than 1 November 2007.

The papers will be peer reviewed  by at least two members of the
program committee. Authors will be notified via email  on the results
of the review by 15 December 2007.

The authors of accepted papers may have to improve their paper on the
basis of the reviewers' comments and will be asked to send a camera
ready version of their manuscripts, including all source files (text
and images), by 8 January 2008. All accepted papers will appear in the
workshop proceedings, published in the Springer LNCS series, which
will be available at the workshop.

The authors of papers that receive the best reviews will be nominated
for the 'Best paper Award'.


__Important Dates__

Submission deadline: 1 November 2007
Notification of acceptance: 15 December 2007 Camera ready papers due:
8 January 2008
Workshop: 26-28 March 2008



__Web Addresses__

Conference web page

http://www.evostar.org

Workshop web page

http://evostar.iti.upv.es/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=51&Itemid\
=55



-------------------


[1] GS Hornby & T Yu, "EC Practitioners: Results of the First Survey",
SIGEVOlution, Newsletter of the ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic
and Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 2(1), Spring 2007 www.sigevolution.org

[2] Authors are also invited to submit their best algorithms to
http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/ecb/

#602 From: "Anna Esparcia" <anna@...>
Date: Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:11 am
Subject: CFP- EvoTHEORY 2008 1st Workshop on Theoretical Aspects of Artificial Evolution
aiesparcia
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
CALL FOR PAPERS
EvoTHEORY 2008

First European Workshop on Theoretical Aspects of Artificial Evolution

26-28 March, 2008, Naples, Italy

http://www.evostar.org/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
INTRODUCTION
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

It is a central goal of theoretical investigations of evolutionary
algorithms to assist practitioners with the tasks of selecting and
designing good strategy variants and operators. Due to the rapid
pace at which new strategy variants and operators are being
proposed, theoretical foundations of evolutionary algorithms still
lag behind practice. However, theoretical studies have gained much
momentum over the last few years and have made numerous valuable
contributions to the field of evolutionary computation.

The aim of this workshop is to find common ground among the
multitude of theoretical approaches and identify open questions
central to the field as a whole.

The workshop will be held from 26-28 March, 2008 in Naples,
Italy, as part of the EvoStar event.

Accepted papers will be presented orally at the workshop and
included in the EvoWorkshops proceedings, published by Springer
Verlag in the Lecture Notes in Computer Science series.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOPICS OF INTEREST
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The theory of evolutionary algorithms today consists of a wide
range of different approaches. Run-time analysis, schema theory,
analysis of the dynamics of artificial evolution, and systematic
empirical analysis all consider different aspects of bio-inspired
algorithms behaviour.
Moreover, they employ different methods and tools for attaining
their goals, such as Markov chains, randomized algorithms,
infinite population models, or ideas based on statistical
mechanics or population dynamics. All aspects of analysis are of
interest, including but not limited to: population dynamics,
run-time analysis, fitness landscapes and problem difficulty,
genetic operator design, genetic repair principles, self-adaptive
parameters, multi-objective problems.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND SUBMISSION DETAILS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submit your manuscript, at most 10 A4 pages long, in Springer
LNCS format (instructions downloadable from
http://www.springeronline.com/sgw/cda/frontpage/0,11855,5-164-2-72376
-0,00.html)
no later than November 1, 2007.

The papers will be peer reviewed by at least three members of
the program committee. Authors will be notified via email on the
results of the review by December 15, 2007.

The authors of accepted papers will have to improve their paper
on the basis of the reviewers' comments and will be asked to
send a camera ready version of their manuscripts, along with
text sources and pictures, by January 8, 2008. The accepted
papers will appear in the workshop proceedings, published in
Springer LNCS Series, which will be available at the workshop.

Further information, including the Online Submission Details,
can be found in
http://www.evostar.org

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
IMPORTANT DATES
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submission:         1 November 2007
Notification:       15 December 2007
Camera ready:       8 January 2008
Workshop:           26-28 March 2008

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
WORKSHOP CHAIRS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mario Giacobini
Department of Animal Production Epidemiology and Ecology
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
and Computational Biology Unit
Molecular Biotechnology Center
University of Torino, Italy

Jonathan Rowe
School of Computer Science
University of Birmingham
Birmingham, UK

#601 From: "Anna Esparcia" <anna@...>
Date: Wed Sep 26, 2007 7:45 am
Subject: CFP - EvoPhD 2008 European Graduate Student Workshop on Evolutionary Computation
aiesparcia
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
(Apologies for multiple posting)


**************** CALL FOR PAPERS ****************

EvoPhD 2008

Third European Graduate Student Workshop on
Evolutionary Computation

Naples, Italy, 26-28 March 2008


This is the third European workshop on evolutionary
computation that focuses on work of PhD students.
Its main aim is to give students feedback on the
current state of their thesis. This workshop provides
a chance to students to present their work to a friendly
audience of other students as well as experts in the
field. It also provides students with contacts and
professional networking opportunities, which helps
them to integrate into the community.

For you as a student, the aim of a submission is to
get feedback on the current state of your thesis.
Submissions will be evaluated by members of a
high-quality committee that consists of long running
members of the community with the goal to provide
in-depth feedback. You are required to submit a paper
that summarizes the research performed and planned as
part of your dissertation.

The number of participants is limited. Accepted papers
will not be published in a proceedings, but will be
disseminated among the participants of the event.

The workshop is part of Evo*2008, which combined form
Europe's premier co-located events in the field of
evolutionary computing. The next event takes place in
Naples, Italy. Featuring the latest in theoretical
and applied research, the topics include recent genetic
programming challenges, evolutionary and other meta-heuristic
approaches for combinatorial optimization, evolutionary
algorithms in the biosciences, in music and art domains, in
image analysis and signal processing systems, in hardware
optimisation and as applied to a range of industrial and
financial optimisation problems.

Web address: http://www.evostar.org

Topics include, but are not limited to,

* Any topic that fits in the scope of the conferences and
   workshops
* Bio-inspired computing, such as evolutionary computing,
   ant colony optimization, swarm intelligence, and neural
   networks
* Local optimisation methods (tabu search, simulated annealing)
* All flavours of evolutionary computation (genetic programming,
evolution strategies, genetic algorithms, memetic algorithms, etc.)
* Combinatorial optimisation with bio-inspired computing
* Application of evolutionary computation to real-life problems
* Hybrid architectures that include bio-inspired components
* Theory on a relevant area of bio-inspired computing
Submission Information

The deadline for submission is 22 December 2007.
Authors will be notified of acceptance on 1 February 2008.
Camera-ready version of accepted paper due on 29 February 2008.
The page limit is 12 A4 pages in Springer LCNS format.

Submissions should be e-mailed in PDF or gzipped postscript to
evophd (at) vanhemert.co.uk

* Please read the formatting and content guidelines on the web page. *


Organising Committee

Program Chairs

     Jano van Hemert
     jano (at) vanhemert.co.uk
     University of Edinburgh, UK

     Mario Giacobini
     mario.giacobini (at) unito.it
     University of Torino, Italy

     Cecilia Di Chio
     cdichi (at) essex.ac.uk
     University of Essex, UK


Local Chair

     Ivanoe De Falco
     ivanoe.defalco (at) na.icar.cnr.it
     ICAR-CNR, Italy


Publicity Chair

     Anna Esparcia
     aesparcia (at) iti.upv.es
     Instituto Tecnologico de Informatica, Valencia, Spain

#600 From: "Anna Esparcia" <anna@...>
Date: Thu Sep 6, 2007 12:02 pm
Subject: Evo* 2008 Conference Announcement
aiesparcia
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
[Apologies for multiple postings]

-----------------------------------------------------------
                     CONFERENCE ANNOUNCEMENT

                          Evo* 2008
                       26-28 March 2008
		        Napoli, Italy
                       www.evostar.org
-----------------------------------------------------------


Evo* - The main European events on Evolutionary Computation

Evo* joins the Europe's premier co-located events in the field of
evolutionary computing, namely the EuroGP, EvoCOP and EvoBIO
conferences and workshops collectively entitled EvoWorkshops. The
2008 event will take place in Naples/Napoli, Italy. Featuring the
latest in theoretical and applied research, the topics will include
recent genetic programming challenges, evolutionary and other meta-
heuristic approaches for combinatorial optimisation, evolutionary
algorithms in the biosciences, in music and art domains, in image
analysis and signal processing systems, in hardware optimisation and
as applied to a range of industrial and financial optimisation
problems.


EuroGP 2008
     Eleventh European Conference on Genetic Programming

EvoCOP 2008
     Eighth European Conference on Evolutionary Computation
     in Combinatorial Optimisation

EvoBIO 2008
     Sixth European Conference on Evolutionary Computation,
     Machine Learning and Data Mining in Bioinformatics

EvoWorkshops 2008
     European Workshops on the Theory and Applications of
     Evolutionary Computation

	 EvoCOMNET
	 Fifth European Workshop on the Application of Nature-
	 inspired Techniques to Telecommunication Networks and
	 other Connected Systems

	 EvoFIN
	 Second European Workshop on Evolutionary Computation
	 in Finance and Economics

	 EvoHOT
	 Fourth European Workshop on Bio-Inspired Heuristics
	 for Design Automation

	 EvoIASP
	 Tenth Workshop on Evolutionary Computation in Image
	 Analysis and Signal Processing

	 EvoMUSART
	 Sixth European Workshop on Evolutionary and
	 Biologically Inspired Music, Sound, Art and Design

	 EvoNUM
	 First European Workshop on Bio-inspired algorithms
	 for continuous parameter optimisation

	 EvoPhD
	 Third European Graduate Student Workshop on
	 Evolutionary Computation

	 EvoSTOC
	 Fifth European Workshop on Evolutionary Algorithms in
	 Stochastic and Dynamic Environments

	 EvoTHEORY -
	 First European Workshop on Theoretical Aspects in
	 Artificial Evolution

	 EvoTransLog
	 Second European Workshop on Evolutionary Computation
	 in Transportation and Logistics


Proceedings will be published as part of Springer's Lecture Notes in
Computer Science series.

Important dates

     * Submission deadline: 1 November 2007
     * Events: 26-28 March 2008

Information on specific events will be publicised shortly.

Evo* website: www.evostar.org

Evo* poster
	 You can download the Evo* poster advertisement in PDF format
from http://cas.iti.upv.es/evostar2008/evostar2008poster.pdf



Local Organising Committee
   Ivanoe De Falco, ICAR-CNR, Italy
   Antonio Della Cioppa, University of Salerno, Italy
   Ernesto Tarantino, ICAR-CNR, Italy
   Giuseppe Trautteur, University of Naples Federico II, Italy

Evo* Coordinator and Administrative Contact
   Jennifer Willies, School of Computing, Napier University, Scotland,
UK

Publicity Chair
   Anna Esparcia, Instituto Tecnologico de Informatica,  Spain

#599 From: John Latter <jorolat@...>
Date: Sat Oct 14, 2006 9:07 pm
Subject: Re: my hypothesis
jorolat
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
I have uploaded your file to:

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/evomech/files/

I'll have a look later!

John Latter / Jorolat

Model of an Internal Evolutionary Mechanism (based on an extension to homeostasis) linking Adaptive Mutations to the Baldwin Effect:
http://members.aol.com/jorolat/index.html

Evolution Research Blog:
http://evomech.blogspot.com/

Support Research:
http://evomech3.blogspot.com/2006/07/supportsponsor-evolution-research.html




kutumbarao nhv wrote:
this is my hypothesis on the mecanism of evolution.i will be glad to recieve fed back on my hypothesis.
                                        thanking you
                                                                
 
                                                                               kutumbarao.n.h.v


Find out what India is talking about on - Yahoo! Answers India
Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Yahoo! Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW
-- 

#598 From: evomech@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sat Oct 14, 2006 9:04 pm
Subject: New file uploaded to evomech
evomech@yahoogroups.com
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the evomech
group.

   File        : /Theory_on_Evolutionary_Mechanism[1].doc
   Uploaded by : jorolat <jorolat@...>
   Description : Theory on Evolutionary Mechanism by kutumbarao.n.h.v

You can access this file at the URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/evomech/files/Theory_on_Evolutionary_Mechanism%5B1\
%5D.doc

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files

Regards,

jorolat <jorolat@...>

#597 From: kutumbarao nhv <kutumbarao_nhv@...>
Date: Sat Oct 14, 2006 7:33 am
Subject: my hypothesis
kutumbarao_nhv
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
this is my hypothesis on the mecanism of evolution.i will be glad to recieve fed back on my hypothesis.
                                        thanking you
                                                                
 
                                                                               kutumbarao.n.h.v


Find out what India is talking about on - Yahoo! Answers India
Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Yahoo! Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW

#596 From: kutumbarao nhv <kutumbarao_nhv@...>
Date: Fri Oct 6, 2006 11:06 am
Subject: request
kutumbarao_nhv
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
i am new member of ur group.i am a student. i proposed an hypothesis to explain the mechanism of evolutionary process.can i mail to u as i can paste it on web &to know the remarks on my hypothesis.        

                                     thanking u
   

                                                                                  kutumbarao.n.h.v


Find out what India is talking about on - Yahoo! Answers India
Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Yahoo! Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW

#595 From: "John Latter" <jorolat@...>
Date: Fri Aug 11, 2006 1:57 pm
Subject: New theory of environmental inheritance ('05 Press Release)
jorolat
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

New research has provided evidence for 'environmental inheritance', a radical theory of transgenerational genetic adaptation proposed by Professor Marcus Pembrey of the Institute of Child Health, UCL in the mid 1990's

The latest evidence challenges accepted thinking on genetic inheritance, suggesting that historic events can contribute to some common modern illnesses.

The research, published by the Children of the 90s study based at the University of Bristol in collaboration with Umea University, Sweden, could have far-reaching implications for our understanding of modern health epidemics - such as obesity or cardiovascular disease.

Conventionally scientists believe that how we develop as adults depends on two factors - the genes (DNA) we inherit from our parents, and the environmental influences, such as diet, lifestyle, exposure to pollution from conception onwards.

Professor Marcus Pembrey, who is also head of Genetics at Children of the 90s, says that over the long term, the process of Darwinian evolution by random errors in DNA followed by natural selection ensures that the human race adapts to changes in our environment. But it takes very many generations.

Now there is evidence for another mechanism which no-one had considered... some of the father's own experiences in his childhood are captured in some way by his sperm, so affecting the genes that he bequeaths to his descendants.

Link for the above:

http://www.alspac.bristol.ac.uk/press/env_inheritance.shtml 

Also see:

'Cardiovascular and diabetes mortality determined by nutrition' at:

http://evomech.blogspot.com/2006/07/cardiovascular-and-diabetes-mortality.html 

John Latter

Model of an Internal Evolutionary Mechanism (based on an extension to homeostasis) linking Adaptive Mutations to the Baldwin Effect:
http://members.aol.com/jorolat/index.html

Evolution Research Blog:
http://evomech.blogspot.com/

technorati tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


#594 From: "John Latter" <jorolat@...>
Date: Thu Jul 27, 2006 4:45 am
Subject: UF scientists discover evolutionary origin of fins, limbs
jorolat
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

UF scientists discover evolutionary origin of fins, limbs


Gainesville, Florida: - Performance on the dance floor may notalways show it, but people are rarely born with two left feet. We havegenes that instruct our arms and legs to grow in the right places andpoint in the right directions. They also provide for the spaces betweenour fingers and toes and every other formative detail of our limbs.

Evolutionarilyspeaking, the genetic instructions used to construct and position ourlimbs were being perfected more than half a billion years ago infishes, not along the sides of the body where the fins that precededhuman arms and legs sprouted, but at the midline that runs along thebackbone and belly.

This midline - think of the dorsal, tail andanal fins of a fish - is where the genetic template to produce finsoriginated, about 100 million years before paired fins evolved andabout 200 million years before paired fins evolved into limbs,according to University of Florida genetics researchers. The findings,published online today in the journal Nature, also provide insight intothe evolutionary history of genes involved in human birth defects.[evolution, origin]

[The Nature paper is currently available here but the link won't work for long because it's an advance publication - email if you have any problems.]

technorati tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

John Latter / Jorolat

-- 
Model of an Internal Evolutionary Mechanism (based on an extension to homeostasis) linking Adaptive Mutations to the Baldwin Effect:
http://members.aol.com/jorolat/index.html

Evolution Research Blog:
http://evomech.blogspot.com/

Support Research:
http://evomech3.blogspot.com/2006/07/supportsponsor-evolution-research.html


#593 From: "John Latter" <jorolat@...>
Date: Wed Jul 19, 2006 8:24 pm
Subject: [Update] Re: The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm
jorolat
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

--- In evomech@yahoogroups.com, "John Latter" <jorolat@...> wrote:
>
>
> --- In evomech@yahoogroups.com, "jorolat" jorolat@a... wrote:
> >
> > [Gould & Lewontin, Royal Society of London, '78]
> >
> > Abstract:
> >
> > "An adaptationist programme has dominated evolutionary thought in
> > england and the United States during the past forty years. It is
> > based on faith in the power of natural selection as an optimizing
> > agent. It proceeds by breaking an organism into unitary "traits" and
> > proposing an adaptive story for each considered separately. Trade-
> > offs among competing selective demands exert the only brake upon
> > perfection; nonoptimality is thereby rendered as a result of
> > adaptation as well. We criticize this approach and attempt to
> > reassert a competing notion (long popular in continental Europe) that
> > organisms must be analyzed as integrated wholes, with baupläne so
> > constrained by phyletic heritage, pathways of development, and
> > general architecture that the constraints themselves become more
> > interesting and more important in delimiting pathways of change than
> > the selective force that may mediate change when it occurs. We fault
> > the adaptationist programme for its failure to distinguish current
> > utility from reasons for origin (male tyrannosaurs may have used
> > their diminutive front legs to titillate female partners, but this
> > will not explain why they got so small); for its unwillingness to
> > consider alternatives to adaptive stories; for its reliance upon
> > plausibility alone as a criterion for accepting speculative tales;
> > and for its failure to consider adequately such competing themes as
> > random fixation of alleles, production of nonadaptive structures by
> > developmental correlation with selected features (allometry,
> > pleiotropy, material compensation, mechanically forced correlation),
> > the separability of adaptation and selection, multiple adaptive
> > peaks, and current utility as an epiphenomenon of nonadaptive
> > structures. We support Darwin's own pluralistic approach to
> > identifying the agents of evolutionary change."
> >
> > Full text at:
> >
> > http://www.aaas.org/spp/dser/evolution/science/spandrel.htm
> >
> > [Bookmarked]
> >
> > Jorolat
>
> Now available at:
>
> http://www.aaas.org/spp/dser/evolution/history/spandrel.shtml
>
> John
> -- Model of an Internal Evolutionary Mechanism (based on an extension to homeostasis) linking Adaptive Mutations to the Baldwin Effect:
> http://members.aol.com/jorolat/index.html Evolution: Where Darwin meets Lamarck? Discussion Forum:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/evomech/
>

Now available at:

http://www.aaas.org/spp/dser/03_Areas/evolution/perspectives/Gould_Lewontin_1979.shtml

Wish they would stop moving it! :)

John Latter / Jorolat

#592 From: "John Latter" <jorolat@...>
Date: Thu Jun 15, 2006 6:49 am
Subject: Re: Origin of Instincts
jorolat
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

--- In evomech@yahoogroups.com, "alexbertoglio" <alexbertoglio@...> wrote:
>
> I have searched the internet, talkorigins, Baldwinian explanations,
> and the post archive here and been unable to find a good explanation
> of how instincts (not reflexes) originate.
>
> My dad is reading the book "Improbable" by Adam Fawer, and apparently
> it makes a case for a "shared consciousness" to explain instincts that
> are not coded for in DNA. I have tried to explain the Baldwinian
> effect to him but I cannot explain how exactly the DNA itself passes
> instincts.
>
> According to the book, Biologists have been unable to explain how
> babies have the instinct (or skills) to walk, without ever seeing
> walking in action.
>
> I plan on reading "Improbable" to find out exactly what it says, but
> can anyone explain how instincts are formed?
>
> And can anyone explain why the concept of "shared consciousness" is
> used in this regard? I havn't read the book yet, but apparently the
> point is that some things that don't pass by DNA are instead contained
> in everyone, in some meta-physical sense. I don't buy it, but maybe
> someone with more education in meta-physics can explain it better.
>

Hi Alex,

Perhaps someone more knowledgeable than I could give you anexplanation in terms of conventional theory but I doubt one exists.

Personally, I'm interested in the possibility of an homeostaicinternal evolutionary mechanism. The phenomena of instinct issupportive of this proposal but a coherent explanation from thisperspective is a bit further down the line at the moment.

I'm slightly intrigued by what 'shared conciousness' may mean althoughI'm not particularly interested in anything that can't be tested.

John Latter / Jorolat

technorati tags: , , , , , , ,


#590 From: "alexbertoglio" <alexbertoglio@...>
Date: Wed Jun 14, 2006 6:33 am
Subject: Origin of Instincts
alexbertoglio
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
I have searched the internet, talkorigins, Baldwinian explanations,
and the post archive here and been unable to find a good explanation
of how instincts (not reflexes) originate.

My dad is reading the book "Improbable" by Adam Fawer, and apparently
it makes a case for a "shared consciousness" to explain instincts that
are not coded for in DNA. I have tried to explain the Baldwinian
effect to him but I cannot explain how exactly the DNA itself passes
instincts.

According to the book, Biologists have been unable to explain how
babies  have the instinct (or skills) to walk, without ever seeing
walking in action.

I plan on reading "Improbable" to find out exactly what it says, but
can anyone explain how instincts are formed?

And can anyone explain why the concept of "shared consciousness" is
used in this regard? I havn't read the book yet, but apparently the
point is that some things that don't pass by DNA are instead contained
in everyone, in some meta-physical sense. I don't buy it, but maybe
someone with more education in meta-physics can explain it better.

#589 From: John Latter <jorolat@...>
Date: Mon Mar 20, 2006 7:55 am
Subject: Self-Organization, Emergence and the Architecture of Complexity
jorolat
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

Heylighen F. (1989): "Self-Organization, Emergence and the Architecture of Complexity", in:
Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on System Science, (AFCET, Paris), p. 23-32.

Abstract:

It is argued that the problems of emergence and the architecture of complexity can be solved by analysing the self-organizing evolution of complex systems. A generalized, distributed variation selection model is proposed, in which internal and external aspects of selection and variation are contrasted. "Relational closure" is introduced as an internal selection criterion. A possible application of the theory in the form of a pattern directed computer system for supporting complex problem-solving is sketched.

Full text at:

http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/Papers/SelfArchCom.pdf

John Latter

Evolution: Research Blog | Website | Blog Mad | Webring

technorati tags: , ,


#588 From: John Latter <jorolat@...>
Date: Sun Mar 19, 2006 3:00 pm
Subject: Re: Re: Darwin on trial (online book)
jorolat
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
On 19/03/2006 johnhewitt22 wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I have never seen this book, by Phillip E. Johnson, but I have to say
> that, at a cursory reading, it seems rather good.
>
> Perhaps we could have an update on the author. Who is he? What is the
> backgound of the e-book?
>
> Sincerely
>
> John Hewitt


Hi John,

The last I heard of Johnson he was an IDist law professor at Berkeley. Here are a couple of links:

"Welcome. This page presents Professor Johnson's works, primarily
in the area of origins. On this page, you will also find his
speaking schedule."
http://www.origins.org/pjohnson/pjohnson.html

"Articles by Phillip Johnson"
http://www.arn.org/authors/johnson_articles.html

I first came across Johnson in my search for more information about Grasse:

"
MY STARTING POINT is a book review that Theodosius Dobzhansky published in 1975, critiquing Pierre Grasse's The Evolution of Life.{1}  Grasse, an eminent French zoologist, believed in something that he called "evolution." So did Dobzhansky, but when Dobzhansky used that term he meant neo-Darwinism, evolution propelled by random mutation and guided by natural selection. Grasse used the same term to refer to something very different, a poorly understood process of transformation in which one general category (like reptiles) gave rise to another (like mammals), guided by mysterious "internal factors" that seemed to compel many individual lines of descent to converge at a new form of life."

From "Darwin's Rules of Reasoning" at:
http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/fte/darwinism/chapter1.html

Hope this helps!

John Latter
-- 
Evolution: Research Blog | Website | Blog Mad | Webring

technorati tags: , , , , , , , ,


#587 From: "johnhewitt22" <johnhewitt22@...>
Date: Sun Mar 19, 2006 11:52 am
Subject: Re: Darwin on trial (online book)
johnhewitt22
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Dear All,

I have never seen this book, by Phillip E. Johnson, but I have to say
that, at a cursory reading, it seems rather good.

Perhaps we could have an update on the author. Who is he? What is the
backgound of the e-book?

Sincerely

John Hewitt

#586 From: John Latter <jorolat@...>
Date: Sun Mar 19, 2006 7:46 am
Subject: Regulating General Mutation Rates (Etc.) (Genetics)
jorolat
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

Genetics, Vol. 163, 1483-1496, April 2003, Copyright 2003
Regulating General Mutation Rates: Examination of the Hypermutable State Model for Cairnsian Adaptive Mutation
John R. Rotha, Eric Kofoid, Frederick P. Roth, Otto G. Bergc, Jon Segera, and Dan I. Andersson

Abstract:

In the lac adaptive mutation system of Cairns, selected mutant colonies but not unselected mutant types appear to arise from a nongrowing population of Escherichia coli. The general mutagenesis suffered by the selected mutants has been interpreted as support for the idea that E. coli possesses an evolved (and therefore beneficial) mechanism that increases the mutation rate in response to stress (the hypermutable state model, HSM). This mechanism is proposed to allow faster genetic adaptation to stressful conditions and to explain why mutations appear directed to useful sites. Analysis of the HSM reveals that it requires implausibly intense mutagenesis (105 times the unselected rate) and even then cannot account for the behavior of the Cairns system. The assumptions of the HSM predict that selected revertants will carry an average of eight deleterious null mutations and thus seem unlikely to be successful in long-term evolution. The experimentally observed 35-fold increase in the level of general mutagenesis cannot account for even one Lac+ revertant from a mutagenized subpopulation of 105 cells (the number proposed to enter the hypermutable state). We conclude that temporary general mutagenesis during stress is unlikely to provide a long-term selective advantage in this or any similar genetic system.

Full text at:

http://www.genetics.org/cgi/content/full/163/4/1483

John Latter

technorati tags: , , ,

-- 
Evolution: Research Blog | Website | Blog Mad | Webring

#585 From: John Latter <jorolat@...>
Date: Sat Mar 18, 2006 7:23 am
Subject: Darwin on trial (online book)
jorolat
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 LIBRARY OF THE FUTURE (R) Series Third Edition  Ver. 4.3
Darwin on Trial                         Johnson, Phillip E     
----------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
                                                                            
                                                                            
                                                                            
                                      1991                                  
                                DARWIN ON TRIAL                             
                                                                            
                             by Phillip E. Johnson                          
                                                                            
                                                                            
                                                                            
                                                                            
                                                                            
                                                                            
                     (C) Copyright 1991, Phillip E. Johnson                 
                 Used with permission of Phillip E. Johnson and             
                         Regnery Gateway Publishing Co.                     
                                                                            
 Electronically Enhanced Text (c) Copyright 1993 World Library, Inc.        
                                                                            
CONTENTS                                                                    
                               CONTENTS                                     
-                                                                            
           Chapter One:     The Legal Setting                               
           Chapter Two:     Natural Selection                               
                              As a Tautology                                
                              As a Scientific Hypothesis                    
                              As a Deductive Argument                       
                              As a Philosophical Necessity                  
           Chapter Three:   Mutations Great and Small                       
           Chapter Four:    The Fossil Problem                              
           Chapter Five:    The Fact of Evolution                           
           Chapter Six:     The Vertebrate Sequence                         
                              Fish to Amphibians                            
                              Amphibians to Reptiles                        
                              Reptiles to Mammals                           
                              Reptile to Bird                               
                              From Apes to Humans                           
           Chapter Seven:   The Molecular Evidence                          
           Chapter Eight:   Prebiological Evolution                         
           Chapter Nine:    The Rules of Science                            
           Chapter Ten:     Darwinist Religion                              
           Chapter Eleven:  Darwinist Education                             
           Chapter Twelve:  Science and Pseudoscience                       
                            Research Notes          

Full text at:

http://www.geocities.com/kubyimm2/darwin-on-trial-phillip-johnson.txt

John Latter

-- 
Evolution: Research Blog | Website | Blog Mad | Webring

technorati tags: , , , , , , ,


#584 From: John Latter <jorolat@...>
Date: Fri Mar 17, 2006 7:54 am
Subject: At Berkeley: Intelligently Designed Molecular Evolution (Research News)
jorolat
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
BERKELEY, CA - Evolutionary paths to new therapeutic drugs, as well as a wide assortment of other enzyme products, have been created through, of all things, intelligent design.  A team of researchers with the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) and the University of California at Berkeley have developed a technique in which the evolution of an important class of proteins is steered towards a desired outcome.

"We've taken enzymes that are promiscuous, meaning they have the capacity to evolve along many different functional lines, and trained them to become specialists," said chemical engineer Jay Keasling, who led this study.

Full text at:

http://www.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/PBD-molecular-evolution.html

John Latter
-- 
Model of an Internal Evolutionary Mechanism:
http://members.aol.com/jorolat/index.html

technorati tags: , , ,


#583 From: John Latter <jorolat@...>
Date: Thu Mar 16, 2006 7:26 am
Subject: Function and the Evolution of Phenotypic Stability: Connecting Pattern to Process
jorolat
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

American Zoologist: Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 552 - 563.
Function and the Evolution of Phenotypic Stability: Connecting Pattern to Process
Kurt Schwenk and Gunter P. Wagner

Abstract:

Phenotypes manifest a balance between the inherited tendency to remain the same (phenotypic stability) and the tendency to change in response to current environmental conditions (adaptation). This paper explores the role of functional integration and functional trade-offs in generating phenotypic stability by limiting the responses of individual characters to environmental selection. Evolutionarily stable configurations (ESCs) are systems of functionally interacting characters within which characters are 'judged' by their contribution to system-level functionality. This 'internal' component of selection differs from traditional 'external' selection in that it travels with the organism wherever it goes and is maintained across a wide range of environments. External selection, in contrast, is by definition environment-dependent. The temporal and geographic constancy of internal selection therefore acts to maintain phenotypic stability even as environments change. Functional trade-offs occur when one character participates in more than one function, but can only be optimized for one. Participation of certain ('keystone') characters in a trade-off potentially causes stabilization of an entire system owing to a cascade of functional dependencies on that character. Phylogenetic character analysis is an essential part of elucidating these processes, but patterns cannot be used as prima facie evidence of particular processes.

Full text at: http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/41/3/552

John Latter

-- 
Model of an Internal Evolutionary Mechanism:
http://members.aol.com/jorolat/index.html

technorati tags: , , , , ,


#582 From: John Latter <jorolat@...>
Date: Wed Mar 15, 2006 7:47 am
Subject: From Epigenesis to Epigenetics: The Case of C. H. Waddington
jorolat
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 981:61-81 (2002)
2002 New York Academy of Sciences
From Epigenesis to Epigenetics
The Case of C. H. Waddington

Linda Van Speybroeck

Abstract:

One continuous thread in this volume is the name of Conrad H. Waddington (1905-1975), the developmental biologist known as the inventor of the term epigenetics. After some biographical notes on his life, this article explores the meaning of the Waddingtonian equation and the context wherein it was developed. This equation holds that epigenesis + genetics = epigenetics, and refers in retrospect to the debate on epigenesis versus preformationism in neoclassical embryology. Whereas Waddington actualized this debate by linking epigenesis to developmental biology and preformation to genetics, thereby stressing the importance of genetic action in causal embryology, today's epigenetics more and more offers the possibility to enfeeble biological thinking in terms of genes only, as it expands the gene-centric view in biology by introducing a flexible and pragmatically oriented hierarchy of crucial genomic contexts that go beyond the organism.

Full text at:

http://www.uv.mx/evargas/CienciaSagrada/TextosFundamentales/Speybroeck.pdf

John Latter

Model of an Internal Evolutionary Mechanism:
http://members.aol.com/jorolat/index.html

technorati tags: , , , , ,




avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.

Virus Database (VPS): 0611-0, 14/03/2006
Tested on: 14/03/2006 20:07:15
avast! - copyright (c) 2000-2004 ALWIL Software.




#581 From: John Latter <jorolat@...>
Date: Tue Mar 14, 2006 8:32 am
Subject: The Return of Hopeful Monsters (Stephen Jay Gould)
jorolat
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

"The Return of Hopeful Monsters" Natural History magazine 86 (June 1976): 24, 30.

Big Brother, the tyrant of George Orwell's 1984, directed his daily Two Minutes Hate against Emmanuel Goldstein, enemy of the people. When I studied evolutionary biology in graduate school during the mid-1960s, official rebuke and derision focused upon Richard Goldschmidt, a famous geneticist who, we were told, had gone astray. Although 1984 creeps up on us, I trust that the world will not be in Big Brother's grip by then. I do, however, predict that during this decade Goldschmidt will be largely vindicated in the world of evolutionary biology.

Goldschmidt, a Jewish refugee from Hitler's decimation of German science, spent the remainder of his career at Berkeley, where he died in 1958. His views on evolution ran afoul of the great neo-Darwinian synthesis forged during the 1930s and 1940s and continuing today as a reigning, if insecure, orthodoxy. Contemporary neo-Darwinism is often called the "synthetic theory of evolution" because it united the theories of population genetics with the classical observations of morphology, systematics, embryology, biogeography, and paleontology.

The core of this synthetic theory restates the two most characteristic assertions of Darwin himself: first, that evolution is a two-stage process (random variation as raw material, natural selection as a directing force); secondly, that evolutionary change is generally slow, steady, gradual, and continuous.

Full text at:

http://www.evolutionary.tripod.com/gould_nh_86_22-30.html

John Latter

-- 
Model of an Internal Evolutionary Mechanism:
http://members.aol.com/jorolat/index.html

technorati tags: , , , , , ,


#580 From: John Latter <jorolat@...>
Date: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:52 am
Subject: Major transitions in animal evolution: A developmental genetic perspective (American Zoologist)
jorolat
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

American Zoologist, 1998, by Holland, Peter W H

Synopsis

Several phases of animal evolution have undergone radical change in developmental mechanisms. I refer to these as major transitions in animal evolution. The six most important transitions in the lineage leading to humans are proposed to be: the origin of multicellularity, the origin of two-germ layers and radial symmetry, the origin of three-germ layers and bilateral symmetry, dorsoventral axis inversion, the origin of vertebrates, the origin of gnathostomes. Here I discuss the genetic changes that may have underlain these transitions. The last two transitions were accompanied by, and possibly facilitated by, large increases in gene number. This probably occurred by tetraploidy, with some of the duplicate genes being subsequently lost. The origin of three germ-layers, bilateral symmetry and a through gut also probably involved gene duplication; in this case, duplication of an ancestral ProtoHox gene cluster to yield two paralogous homeobox gene clusters, Hox and ParaHox, with roles in patterning different germ layers along the anteroposterior body axis. This event may provide a partial genetic explanation for the Cambrian explosion.

Full text at:

http://www.looksmartscience.com/p/articles/mi_qa3746/is_199812/ai_n8819584

John Latter

Evolution: Research Blog | Website | Forum | Webring

technorati tags: , , , ,


#579 From: John Latter <jorolat@...>
Date: Sun Mar 12, 2006 8:03 am
Subject: Natural selection and its limits: Where ecology meets evolution (Pigliucci)
jorolat
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

Pigliucci, M. (2004) Natural selection and its limits: Where ecology meets evolution. In: Casagrandi, R. & Melià, P. (Eds.) Ecologia. Atti del XIII Congresso Nazionale della Società Italiana di Ecologia (Como, 8-10 settembre 2003). Aracne, Roma, p. 29-34.

Abstract:

Natural selection [Darwin 1859] is perhaps the most important component of evolutionary theory, since it is the only known process that can bring about the adaptation of living organisms to their environments [Gould 2002]. And yet, its study is conceptually and methodologically complex, and much attention needs to be paid to a variety of phenomena that can limit the efficacy of selection [Antonovics 1976; Pigliucci and Kaplan 2000]. In this essay, I will use examples of recent work carried out in my laboratory to illustrate basic research on natural selection as conducted using a variety of approaches, including field work, laboratory experiments, and molecular genetics. I also discuss the application of this array of tools to questions pertinent to conservation biology, and in particular to the all-important problem of what makes invasive species so good at creating the sort of  problems they are infamous for [Lee 2002].


Full text at:

http://www.xiiicongresso.societaitalianaecologia.org/articles/Pigliucci.pdf

John Latter

-- 
Evolution: Research Blog | Website | Forum | Webring

technorati tags: , , , , , ,


#578 From: John Latter <jorolat@...>
Date: Sat Mar 11, 2006 6:20 am
Subject: Separation of Man and Ape Down to Gene Expression (PR + Article)
jorolat
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Contents:

1) Separation of Man and Ape Down to Gene Expression


Humans and chimpanzees have in common more than 98 percent of DNA and 99 percent of genes. Yet, in looks and behavior we are very different from them. For more than 30 years--well before either the human or chimpanzee genome had been sequenced--scientists have speculated that this might be due to the way that the common genes express themselves rather than differences in the genes themselves. A new comparison published in Nature seems to prove that theory.

Full text at:

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa003&articleID=0005FB4D-6102-140F-A10283414B7F0000

2) Expression profiling in primates reveals a rapid evolution of human transcription factors

[Gilad et al, Nature, March '06]

Although it has been hypothesized for thirty years that many human adaptations are likely to be due to changes in gene regulation1, almost nothing is known about the modes of natural selection acting on regulation in primates. Here we identify a set of genes for which expression is evolving under natural selection. We use a new multi-species complementary DNA array to compare steady-state messenger RNA levels in liver tissues within and between humans, chimpanzees, orangutans and rhesus macaques. Using estimates from a linear mixed model, we identify a set of genes for which expression levels have remained constant across the entire phylogeny (approx70 million years), and are therefore likely to be under stabilizing selection. Among the top candidates are five genes with expression levels that have previously been shown to be altered in liver carcinoma. We also find a number of genes with similar expression levels among non-human primates but significantly elevated or reduced expression in the human lineage, features that point to the action of directional selection. Among the gene set with a human-specific increase in expression, there is an excess of transcription factors; the same is not true for genes with increased expression in chimpanzee.

Full text at:

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v440/n7081/full/nature04559.html

PDF:

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v440/n7081/pdf/nature04559.pdf

[Evolution] Contact me if you have any problems.

John Latter
-- 
Model of an Internal Evolutionary Mechanism:
http://members.aol.com/jorolat/index.html

technorati tags: , , , , , , ,


#577 From: John Latter <jorolat@...>
Date: Fri Mar 10, 2006 8:13 am
Subject: Epigenetic vs. Genetic, a story of the evolution of the germline
jorolat
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

[Lachmann & Sella, SFI Working Paper]

Abstract:

Differentiation of multicellular organisms is controlled by epigenetic markers transmitted through cell division. Many of the systems that encode these markers exist also in unicellulars, but in unicellulars these systems do not control differentiation. Thus during the evolution of multicellularity, epigenetic inheritance systems were exapted for their current use in differentiation. During this transition there must have been stages at which epigenetic information passed between generations to an even larger extent than it does now. We show that this can lead to the evolution of cells that do not contribute to the progeny of the organism, and thus to a germline-soma distinction. This hints that an intrinsic instability during a transition from unicellulars to multicellulars may be the reason wide spread of the evolution of germ line.

Full text at:

http://www.santafe.edu/sfi/publications/Working-Papers/03-02-012.pdf

John Latter

-- 
Model of an Internal Evolutionary Mechanism:
http://members.aol.com/jorolat/index.html

technorati tags: , , , ,


#576 From: "John Latter" <jorolat@...>
Date: Thu Mar 9, 2006 8:10 am
Subject: Re: Complexity in Biological Signaling Systems (Science)
jorolat
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

--- In evomech@yahoogroups.com, "John Latter" <jorolat@...> wrote:
>
> [Weng, Bhalla, & Iyengar , Science, Apr '99]
>
>
> Introduction:
>
> "Biological signaling pathways interact with one another to form
> complex networks. Complexity arises from the large number of
> components, many with isoforms that have partially overlapping
> functions; from the connections among components; and from the
> spatial relationship between components. The origins of the complex
> behavior of signaling networks and analytical approaches to deal with
> the emergent complexity are discussed here."
>
> Full text (PDF file) at:
>
> http://www.csc.liv.ac.uk/~m1pk/Projects/bhalla%202.pdf
> (begins halfway down the first page)
>
>
> Jorolat

Now available at:

http://www.ncbs.res.in/~faculty/upi_file/upi_papers/weng_bhalla_iyengar_Science1999.pdf

John Latter

Model of an Internal Evolutionary Mechanism:
http://members.aol.com/jorolat/index.html

technorati tags: , ,


#575 From: John Latter <jorolat@...>
Date: Wed Mar 8, 2006 7:29 am
Subject: The inheritance of features (Biology and Philosophy)
jorolat
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Mameli, Biology and Philosophy (2005) 20:365–399

Abstract:


Since the discovery of the double helical structure of DNA, the standard account of the inheritance of features has been in terms of DNA-copying and DNA-transmission. This theory is just a version of the old theory according to which the inheritance of features is explained by the transfer at conception of some developmentally privileged material from parents to offspring. This paper does the following things: (1) it explains what the inheritance of features is; (2) it explains how the DNA-centric theory emerged; (3) it clarifies the relation between the DNA-centric theory and the ‘unfolding’ theory of development; (4) it argues that (given what we now know about developmental processes and genetic activity) the DNA-centric theory should be abandoned in favour of a pluralistic (but not holistic) theory of the inheritance of features. According to this pluralistic theory, the reliable reoccurrence of phenotypes must be explained by appealing not only to processes responsible for the reliable reoccurrence of genetic developmental factors but also to processes responsible for the reliable reoccurrence (or persistence) of nongenetic environmental factors.

Full text at:

http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/~gmm32/MAMELI_INHERITANCE_2005.pdf

John Latter
-- 
Model of an Internal Evolutionary Mechanism:
http://members.aol.com/jorolat/index.html

technorati tags: , , , ,


#574 From: John Latter <jorolat@...>
Date: Tue Mar 7, 2006 9:02 am
Subject: [News] Stowers Scientists Demonstrate Mechanism of Vertebral Formation
jorolat
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

Kansas City, Mo. (March 6, 2006) - Jacqueline Kim Dale, Ph.D., formerly a Senior Research Associate at the Stowers Institute for Medical Research, and Olivier Pourquie, Ph.D., Stowers Institute Investigator and an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, have demonstrated that the long-studied family of transcription factors called Snail is expressed in a cyclic fashion during the formation of the vertebral precursors in the mouse and chick embryo.

The findings, which were published in the March 7 issue of Developmental Cell, indicate that the genes governing many cellular properties are downstream of the segmentation clock, the mechanism that controls the formation of the vertebral column.

Full text at:

http://www.stowers-institute.org/WhatsNew/pr2006/PR030606.asp

John Latter
-- 
Model of an Internal Evolutionary Mechanism:
http://members.aol.com/jorolat/index.html

technorati tags: , , ,


#573 From: John Latter <jorolat@...>
Date: Mon Mar 6, 2006 9:44 am
Subject: Evolution as context-driven actualization of potential: Toward an interdisciplinary theory of change of state
jorolat
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Gabora, L. & Aerts, D. (2005). Evolution as context-driven actualization of potential: Toward an interdisciplinary theory of change of state. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 30(1), 69-88.

Abstract:

It is increasingly evident that there is more to biological evolution than natural selection; moreover, the concept of evolution is not limited to biology. We propose an integrative framework for characterizing how entities evolve, in which evolution is viewed as a process of context-driven actualization of potential (CAP). Processes of change differ according to the degree of nondeterminism, and the degree to which they are sensitive to, internalize, and depend upon a particular context. The approach enables us to embed phenomena across disciplines into a broad conceptual framework. We give examples of insights into physics, biology, culture and cognition that derive from this unifying framework.

Full text at:

http://www.vub.ac.be/CLEA/liane/papers/cap.htm

John Latter

-- 
Model of an Internal Evolutionary Mechanism:
http://members.aol.com/jorolat/index.html

technorati tags: , , , ,


Messages 573 - 603 of 604   Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help