... Could you elaborate on this? Obviously the generated code can be treated like object files in a hand-coded system and only need to CM them on a formal...
NOTE: This is a semi-followup to a discussion on the mda-discussion group. A spliced state model is one that exists, for example, partly in a superclass and...
... I usually don't bother with a parent class, but instead rely on flexible tools to allow me to create "superstates" within a class diagram. This is possible...
Responding to Marco... ... The models clearly need to be CMed because they represent to original sources. If there were any changes to the transformation...
Responding to Riemenschneider... ... My recollection of that discussion was that Sally Shlaer stepped in just before it got to the point of death threats and...
... just ... I would actually term this as: " "splicing" referred only to the interpretive work the translation engine had to do to construct the individual...
... This isn't really the same as a spliced state model, because a spliced state model is executing generic behavior in the superclass state model, not...
Responding to Riemenschneider... ... OK. ... Right. That view led to the debate to begin with -- the notion that somehow a superclass state machine had its...
... OK. I was equating behavior to interface. Bad terminology on my part, but I'll explain below. ... This isn't the real problem, because the same events...
Responding to Riemenschneider... ... Sure they can. All one is doing is splitting apart the quite legal state machine: +--------------------+ ... V E1...
... in a ... itself ... moved ... I think we're talking around each other in some ways. The Executable UML notation is ambiguous, because it doesn't support a...
Responding to Riemenschneider... ... OK, but I responding to the notion that splicing was useful by saying that the splicing notation ambiguity was a problem...
Responding to Riemenschneider... ... Note "...in the first example". In your first example you had a single instance already in hand and navigated down the...
... Ah! The semantics of OO! ;-) Maybe we need to clarify whether we are talking about set instances, OOA instances, or OOPL instances, or what the rules are...
Responding to Riemenschneider... ... As you point out, there is a rational for defining the sets. But the syntax "create object instance" of c2 seems highly...
The concept of "assigner" is defined [pg 219] as "a state machine that serves as a single point of control for creating links on competitive associations"....
Responding to Ring... ... No. I believe it is best to think of critters like the Assigner as examples of a GoF Singleton design pattern where it is important...
... Well, this could be said to be confusing, but a superclass and subclass are distinct OOA elements. "create object instance" just denotes creating an...
Responding to Riemenschneider... ... Class2 is an OOA model element that is _part of_ an OOA subclassing definition. When that definition is implemented there...
... Where's the discriminator? i.e., You're creating an instance of subset A, and all instances of subset A will also reside in subset B, C, or D. Somewhere B,...
... easy ... By MDS, I mean the R1 != R2; IMO, R1 = R2 is nonsense due to having two identifiers for the same generalization. We were talking about creating an...
Responding to Riemenschneider... ... How soon they forget. We had a discussion over this last year and you won! R1 = R2 means /all/ subclasses are disjoint...
... Someday we'll have to learn to talk the same language, so we don't have these long discussions to reach the same conclusion. ;-) However, since no one else...
Hi. Where can I find more info (docs, tutorials, etc.) about UML 2 diagrams, specially Activity Diagram and Composite Structure Diagram? Thanks....
niksa_os
niksa_os@...
Sep 17, 2004 4:41 am
773
I was (re)reading the section on Use Cases in the Executable UML book today and got to section 4.4.1 when it occured to me that a Use Case diagram isn't all...
... I have also never found Use Case diagrams to be of assistance. identifying Use Cases is *extremely* important, but the text is always adequate for my own...
The book I've liked the best on use case modeling is Kurt Bittner and Ian Spence's by the same name "Use Case Modeling". In their book I believe they say...
Responding to Riemenschneider... ... NS, DT. B-)) Use cases are a form of requirements specification so they really aren't part of either UML or eUML....