Aloha, below is a letter from Dr Jean Pierre Petit concerning the reverse
engineering of captured extraterrestrial technologies and the use of anti-matter
technologies. It is extracted from a series of emails posted on his website in
March 2003 that are critical of various aspects of Dr Greer's Disclosure
Project, especially those portions dealing with the development of alternative
energy technologies that are part of Greer's SEAS project. In the letter below,
Dr Petit, a distinguished French scientist with impeccable scientific
credentials examines various black projects that are reverse engineered from
crashed extraterrestrial vehicles including hypersonic vehicles such as the
Aurora, hypersonic torpedoes used by the US Navy, and anti-matter weapons. He
says that some of the ETVs have been deliberatedly targetted and brought down by
the US military, and this has recently involved the use of directed energy
weapons. Significantly, Dr Petit briefly refers to alternative extraterrestrial
information passed on to him and other scientists by a race of extraterrestrials
allegedly from the Planet Ummo who secretly visited Earth from the 1950s to the
early 1970's. He has published material on the Ummites that is available online
at:
http://www.galactic-server.com/rune/ummo2.html
http://www.galactic-server.com/rune/ummo3.html
http://www.galactic-server.com/rune/ummo4.html
Dr Petit's scientific background helps develop confidence in the importance of
his views concering covert projects and extraterrestrial technology. He works
for the elite French scientific institution, CNRS (Centre National de la
recherche Scientifique). He is "Directeur de Recherche," and attended in
1958-1961 the French aeronautical School (Ecole Nationale Superieure de
m'Aeronautique de Paris). There he worked as a test engineer on solid propellent
rockets (missiles for submarines). In 1965 he began his research to build MHD
convertors. He has also written 32 books. He has given papers at international
MHD meetings (Moscow 1983, Tsukuba, Japan, 1987, Pekin, China, 1990). In 2001 he
attended an international meeting devoted to advanced propulsion. There he met
US scientists involved in black programs, like Aurora, and completed his own
conclusions on the subject.
His views are very likely an accurate representation of the propulsion systems
used in covert programs and the relationship with extraterrestrial technology,
and should be closely studied. His main website with both French and English
articles is available at: http://www.jp-petit.com/
In peace
Michael E. Salla, PhD
www.exopolitics.org
***
Source: http://www.jp-petit.com/Disclosure/disclosure_a_doubt.htm
Open Letter from a group of French scientists to the Initiator of the Disclosure
Project.
Introduction.
We are a group of French scientists. We have read Dr. Greer's text on the
Disclosure Web site and have been impressed by his remarks. We are convinced, as
he is, that certain nations, and chiefly the US, have been able to derive from
the UFO files, from crashed UFO retrievals and from possible contacts with
aliens, information which has led to entirely new scientific knowledge. We shall
farther discuss the assessment of developments achieved on the basis of these
information. The question is : "how far have they reached ?". We hold accurate
information about the American black programs linked with hypersonic planes, be
it the satellisable Aurora spy craft or a hypersonic long range bomber for which
the B2 is but a cover-up. Technical data in our possession allow us, in this
particular case, to sustain our assertions. These technologies were directly
derived from the analysis of the wreck retrieved at Roswell, which was a
hypersonic space shuttle and not an interstellar vehicle. We deplore the fact
that this reverse engineering has only been applied to military ends, since
these techniques could have found better use, the one as a completely
re-reusable space launcher - much more efficient and cheaper than the customary
rockets - the other as a hypersonic commercial plane.
Possible antimatter synthesis.
Besides the above, it is highly presumable that the Americans have mastered a
massive antimatter production technique, this - and not the "void energy" -
being the near magic, inexhaustible future energy coming out of nowhere; unless
one considers the transformation of matter into antimatter by thermonuclear
compression as a means of "extracting energy from the void". I shall ad that
once antimatter has been produced in this way, it can farther be used to produce
more. No nuclear explosion is needed at every start. However this technology
lays in the hands of humanity incredibly more destructive bombs than the most
powerful thermonuclear weapons presently available. It also generates a
potential straightforward war hazard through the fact that very small quantities
of antimatter can be stocked in crystals under very stable electrostatic
confinement; this allows the production of tiny bombs - "bucky balls" - , the
size of an egg, thermal shield included, of 40 ton TNT power. Thanks to their
relatively limited power and the fact that no waste is produced, these bombs
could readily be used. Instead of dropping high power bombs on isolated targets,
which would throw up great quantities of pulverulent matter into the high
atmosphere and generate nuclear winter effects, it would be possible to scatter
a great number of these mini antimatter bombs and cause equal damage, whilst
avoiding that the dust should rise at high altitudes and generate a nuclear
winter. We believe that the US already possess a considerable number of such
weapons with which they would be capable of reducing whole countries to ashes,
and we fear that these devices will soon be discreetly brought into action on
more restricted scales. This takes us far out of sight of the positive
applications of which Humanity could benefit from such a technology and thus
produce, as Dr. Greer rightly puts it, "flowering deserts".
The raw material and waste problem.
We believe that the ET vehicles visiting us use antimatter, stocked on board or
synthesised, as primary source of energy. This basic energy could be put to a
wide range of uses. One of the most useful is to master the transmutation of
materials and be thus able to synthesise at will any type of atom. Coupled with
a very advanced nano-technology, this would allow the most complex systems to be
synthesised without human intervention, i.e. without "work". Inversely, any
system composed of atoms could be converted into neutral waste such as helium,
the typically ideal waste. If we survive the next century, this is the picture
of our future technology. If such a set of techniques were completed with a more
comprehensive approach of biology then that which is practised on Earth today,
the Human being would have the keys of a Golden Age within arm's reach.
Present state of technology on Earth.
We do not know how far these technologies may have been developed on Earth. To
this date we may only strongly suspect that antimatter synthesis through
thermonuclear compression has been obtained in the US towards the end of the
sixties; we shall farther come back to this. Another problem raised by Dr. Greer
is machine weight reduction, suppression or even inversion (anti-gravity). We
consider this as feasible. This is the technique used by UFO's when they hover
without any air displacement. In our opinion this can only be understood via an
important paradigm shift, a different way of comprehending space and matter. But
this is still speculative and we suggest also coming back to it farther on.
Anti-gravity control could obviously be applied to civilian transportation, but
far beyond this, we think it would open the way to outer space travel. Here
again, we shall postpone the subject to the end of this paper.
Our comments on the Space Energy Access Systems.
However commendable the feeling from which this project arises, we are doubtful
as to its chances of success. We think that its applications (unlimited energy
production, anti-gravity), even though physically conceivable, would call for
very expensive advanced technologies. By comparison one could imagine the
Foundation offering men of the Antiquity a full purse of gold to whomever would
fly a plane with three passengers over more than six miles. We are sceptical as
to the compatibility of such techniques with soft technologies within reach of
amateurs and moderately sized laboratories. Such developments may, to our mind,
only be envisaged by large scale laboratories with considerable funds for which
a million dollar prize would seem but a derisory sum compared with the cost of
such research. Consequently, laboratories of that size would inevitably be part
of the military-industrial lobbies. At best would the supporters of such a
project be rewarded with interesting theoretical ideas, but no exploitable
practical results. Such is our opinion, but of course we may be mistaken.
Our answer to the Disclosure Manifest.
Whilst we are not in a state to submit to Dr. Greer plans for an unlimited
energy producing machine or one that could suppress the force of gravity, we
are, on the other hand, able to present strong arguments in support of his
campaign against the diversion of technologies by military-industrial complexes
elusive to American political power and dedicated to serve a few who seek world
domination by force. The elements we are in a state to produce are related to
underwater high velocity propulsion and construction of very long range
hypersonic planes, both these techniques being based on what is called
magneto-hydro-dynamics, or MHD.
General remarks about MHD.
MHD has been the object of sustained research in the sixties, the civilian
sector only having obviously been accessible to the public. The purpose at the
time was to produce electricity through direct MHD conversion, using as primary
energy either fossil fuels - so-called "open cycles" -, or energy produced by
high temperature reactors (HTR). In both cases, research teams came up against
the fact that gases at "technological" temperatures, even when seeded with low
ionisation potential substances such as caesium, are not sufficiently
electrically conductive. Below 3000°K, their electric conductivity is too low.
The Russians have led this technique of MHD electricity production as far as
possible with their U-25 generator, which burns a mixture of hydrocarbons and
pure oxygen. But this civilian oriented research was finally abandoned. Another
trial took place where two-temperature gases were used (in which the electron
gas has a higher temperature than the atom gas). This was not possible in a
molecular environment which contained a lot of carbon dioxide (as a result of
combustion). Indeed, this molecule is readily excited by the chocks with
electrons. The result was a great loss of energy through radiation (radiative
un-excitation). This two-temperature system was thus limited to closed cycles
where the conversion fluid was a rare gas : helium, seeded with caesium, used to
cool down the heart of a reactor working at high temperature (1500°K). Let us
point out that these reactors were neither built nor tested. Atomic scientists
only thought they might be constructed and, thank God, they never were.
This research came up against something which completely annihilated the
generators' performances by making the plasma very non-homogeneous : it was an
instability discovered in 1964 by the Russian Velikhov. These preliminaries may
seem strange, but they explain why civilian MHD research was abandoned in many
countries, except in the US and Russia, where military MHD was at the same time
being developed in great secret. In Russia, the father of military MHD was
Andrei Sakharov. His pupil was none other than Velikhov, innovator of the soviet
style star war, and Poutine's chief consultant for leading edge weapons.
Description of high velocity US and Russian MHD torpedoes.
Since a long time ago, the USA and USSR possessed indubitable evidence that
UFO's were of extraterrestrial origin. The US had retrieved at least one crashed
hypersonic vehicle at Roswell and it is highly probable that the Russians also
collected an equal supply. It was not until the seventies that the Americans
understood that one of the key operating elements of the Roswell shuttle was
MHD. They also grasped that military MHD was of prime strategic importance and
they launched an intense disinformation campaign, at home and abroad, to lure
researchers away from what they declared to be a dead end subject. I hold this
information from the fact that I was closely implied , since 1965, in French
civilian MHD projects. I built a Faraday linear generator, based on a combustion
shock tube, producing a power of several megawatts during 200 microseconds; with
a two tesla magnetic field. The Velikhov instability having been overcome, we
succeeded in obtaining the first two-temperature stable running conditions, and
this was presented at the 1967 Warsaw international colloquium. But
notwithstanding this success, in the early seventies, in our own country as in
others, this research was abandoned. It is worth mentioning that our team
obtained a gas blast speed gain of 5,500 m/s over a distance of less than 4",
with argon fluxes at 10,000°K input into a Faraday accelerator at 2,750 m/s
under a one bar pressure. But at the time nobody in France realised the military
implication of what was to become, elsewhere, an MHD propulsion with high
specific impulse.
If I remember correctly, I travelled to the United States in 1984, to take part
in an international MHD meeting in Boston. The Russians presented their
Pavlovsky generator, one of the various versions of the flux compression
generators tested in the early 50's by Sakharov's team, which was later to
become the typical feed system to their directed energy weapons (electron and
laser beams). Besides this novelty, representatives of various countries,
American researches included, (the colloquium had been organised by J.F. Louis
of AVCO), deplored the loss of interest of their governments. And yet we were
ignorant of the fact that, three years earlier, the Americans had operated their
first MHD torpedoes at 1,000 knots; we got wind of this many years later. Today,
in countries possessing leading technology, propeller torpedoes have been
abandoned since exactly thirty years. The powder rocket propulsion was soon
found to be more efficient and gave rise to such machines as the American
Supercav or the Russian Sqwal.
The russian Sqwal rocket torpedo (250 knots)
The British today possess a similar weapon, the Spearfish. In these torpedoes,
hot gas is ejected from the machine's nose and vaporises the neighbouring sea
water. The torpedo then moves in a sheath of water vapour; the resulting
friction reduction allowing speeds of 200 to 250 kn. Course control is achieved
through the protruding pole which telescopes out of the nose after launching.
Steering is obtained by modulating the exhausts of nozzles which encircle the
main propulsion nozzle and are fed by the forward situated gas generator. Today
however are such machines quite out of date, even though countries such as
France do not even have them yet. American and Russian MHD torpedoes also have a
solid propellant rocket engine. The divergent works like an MHD convector,
producing a large amount of electric energy. This energy feeds a wall
accelerator of which, for the sake of lightness, the principle description is
appended. Such a system sucks the water in very strongly; hence is the viscous
drag concept no longer appropriate since the wake is not only suppressed, but
even reversed; which opens the path to very high speeds. Such speeds, reckoned
today to be able to reach about 1,600 to 1,900 kn., enable the torpedoes to
reach the targets in matters of seconds. It is easy to see the major strategic
asset brought to any nation possessing these torpedoes, since it would enable
the destruction, in a few seconds, of the enemy's strategic nuclear submarines,
which are the most dangerous of all weapons. They are generally positioned as
close as possible to their potential targets in order to reduce the range of the
ballistic flight, hence the chances of interception. In fact, the destruction of
these missile loaded submarines would probably be the very first act of war of
any nation with a high technological level of equipment. The Chinese do not
possess such an equipment yet. In 1996, the Russians attempted to make a
demonstration of their machine nicknamed "the Fat One", of a one meter calibre,
because they were hoping to sell them the torpedoes. Such a technology transfer
would, in the long run, have meant a great menace to world security and,
informed of the transactions, the Americans boarded and sank the Koursk which
was due, in presence of a Chinese general, to make the demonstration. Fearing
this should be discovered, the Russians closed all of the submarine's hatches
(by remote sonar order issued from the Peter the Great cruiser, flagship of the
manoeuvres), letting the entire crew perish and recovering the wreck later.
The MHD torpedo and its parietal accelerator propulsion is thus one of the first
applications of the military MHD derived from the close analysis of the Roswell
wreck.
American hypersonic machines. Aurora and the antipodal hypersonic bomber.
Air travelling machines remained, from there on, to be designed. From Mach 3 up,
the air compression aft of the chock wave generates an important heating. By
shifting to stato it is possible to go up in Mach levels. One can then, around
Mach 6, envisage a scramjet functioning (hypersonic combustion), where fuel and
oxidiser (hydrogen and liquid oxygen) circulate in the leading edge to cool it
down. But the examination of the Roswell vehicle was to yield a much better
solution, which would lead to the Aurora machine, which took its first flight in
1990 at Groom Lake. This very clever craft can take off by its own means, pick
up speed and altitude, reach 6,000 kn. at 180,000 ft., then become sattelised
with conventional rockets. Two very different successive operating modes are
then called upon. At the start, Aurora - of which Ajax, the Russian version
designed by Fraistadt, was never built through lack of funding - looks like a
conventional jet plane. Four turboreactors without post combustion are suspended
under a very cambered wing with a completely flat top and a sharply lifted "duck
tail" trailing edge.
Aurora in subsonic and moderate Mach fligh
Aurora then reaches Mach 3 and the motor air feed changes. The bottom air
intakes close up. The plane then flies in low pressure air which ionises more
easily. An air inlet opens on the top side, in front of which a set of parallel
electrodes form an MHD wall generator. Since this section works as a generator,
the air is slowed down and re-compressed (by Lorenz forces). A continuous
slowing down then takes place, without shock waves and with moderate heating, to
such a point that the gas can be directed to the conventional turboreactor air
intake, even though the plane flies at 6,000 kn. at about 180,000 ft altitude.
Very high tensions are generated by the Hall effect. In these parietal
converters, the Americans use superconductor systems developing 12 teslas. The
Velikhov instability is mastered by magnetic confinement. The high voltage is
used to create a plasma cushion which protects the leading edge. The electric
power is next used to enhance the specific impulse thanks to a wall accelerator
located aft of the nozzle outlets (MHD by-pass system). This is then of the
"semiguided" type.
Aurora, hypersonic flight
It is designed to function with a fixed expansion coefficient at a given
altitude. At lower altitudes, the expansion of the jet is too strong and it then
exhibits a succession of knots and bumps, typical of "over-depressed" jets.
classical over-depressed jet
This explains the mysterious photograph taken near Groom Lake, where the plane,
seen exceptionally in daylight, had not yet reached its adaptation altitude.
photograph of Aurora jet
Aurora's lift is obtained through the generated shock wave on which the plane
surfs; it is a wave rider. But Aurora is not meant to function that way a long
time because the formation of this shock wave generates a drag which entails a
waste of energy. Rockets enable the machine either to become sattelised at an
altitude of 250,000 ft., i.e. the atmosphere's limit, or to execute ballistic
leaps, like a pebble bouncing on a water pond. Under those condition it becomes
a kind of pilotable semisattelite, such as the well known silver surfer. The
total plasma envelope makes it also completely stealthy. Once sattelised at a
speed of 15,000 kn. it can reenter at a very slight angle of incidence without
the need of a degradable thermal shield; the whole surface then works as an MHD
generator. The high tension produces a forward protecting plasma cushion; the
energy being dissipated mainly through radiation. When the plane returns to its
base, the whole process is gone through in reverse order; and when approaching
it is propelled like a conventional plane and can land on a normal runway.
This has all been kept secret. The Americans attempt to lull the awareness of
other countries by rather gross misinformation. They lead Europeans into
thinking that the adventure of hypersonic flight is near at hand, whilst in fact
they have been mastering those techniques for the last twelve years.
Aurora's lift is obtained through the generated shock wave on which the plane
surfs; it is a wave rider. But Aurora is not meant to function that way a long
time because the formation of this shock wave generates a drag which entails a
waste of energy. Rockets enable the machine either to become sattelised at an
altitude of 250,000 ft., i.e. the atmosphere's limit, or to execute ballistic
leaps, like a pebble bouncing on a water pond. Under those condition it becomes
a kind of pilotable semisattelite, such as the well known silver surfer. The
total plasma envelope makes it also completely stealthy. Once sattelised at a
speed of 15,000 kn. it can reenter at a very slight angle of incidence without
the need of a degradable thermal shield; the whole surface then works as an MHD
generator. The high tension produces a forward protecting plasma cushion; the
energy being dissipated mainly through radiation. When the plane returns to its
base, the whole process is gone through in reverse order; and when approaching
it is propelled like a conventional plane and can land on a normal runway.
This has all been kept secret. The Americans attempt to lull the awareness of
other countries by rather gross misinformation. They lead Europeans into
thinking that the adventure of hypersonic flight is near at hand, whilst in fact
they have been mastering those techniques for the last twelve years.
Model of Aurora X-43A slung under the wing of a B-52, and poised in front of a
large powder booster
In flight
The "pseudo-Aurora" test model.
Notice that vertical tails contradicts stealthyness. But the cut nose
corresponds to the real Aurora. This is a cover-up on technological progress.
The civilian version of Aurora would not be a sattelisable spy plane, but a
completely reusable launcher, much cheaper than the classical rockets which
depend solely on the thrust of their motors to overcome the drag linked with the
generation of a chock wave.
What Occidentals ignore, and which I shall reveal in a book, is that Americans
also have a hypersonic long range bomber which can fly at similar speeds and
altitudes. Seen from above, these bombers look like a B2. The saw-tooth shape of
their trailing edge is designed to give stability when landing. The shape causes
eddies which prevent the wing tip loss of lift to creep up towards the leading
edge (short after the war, this phenomenon caused the crash of the flying wing
designed by Jack Northrop). The B2's based at Whitman, supposed to have cost $2
billion each, are just decoys. The real plane is not subsonic and has neither
cockpit nor any hoods above the four motors. These are completely included in
the wing, so as to avoid the turbine vanes from being detected by radar's.
US hypersonic bomber.
Wall convectors sit on the front parts of the wings ahead of the motors. These
systems enable incident air to be re-compressed without shock wave generation
and funnelled into the inlets of classical turboreactors. The machine is a
subtle combination of regions where the MDH wall converter is used to slow down
the gas (as an electrical power generator) and others where, on the contrary,
the gas is accelerated. This system allows complete control over the gas flux
and suppression of any shock wave and hence wave drag. If the latter were to
remain, the plane could not fly a long time considering the energy wasted in
creating it. This elimination of shock waves was obtained in 1997 and opened the
path to the first antipodal flights. In fact, on more than one item this bomber
is more sophisticated than the Aurora. For instance, the electrical discharge at
the leading edge has a better mastered geometry which gives rise to a real
"virtual" leading edge.
Hypersonic long-range bomber
Thus the machine, which the B2 dissimulates, is able to take off from the US,
reach any point on the globe, and come back and land again in the US all in one
night and four hours, even if the target lies in the antipodes at 10,800
nautical miles. Bombing assignments have been enacted in Europe and Afghanistan,
the latter being mentioned as subsonic 40 hour flights, necessitating six
in-flight refuellings, most of which took place over Russia which the planes had
to cross. Considering the vulnerability of a plane while refuelling, who would
be gullible enough to believe such a version ? Notice also that the B2's which
are shown have no bunk of any kind to allow crew members to take some rest.
Could any pilot remain seated for forty hours on an ejector seat ? See on my web
site http://www.jp-petit.com a file on the B2.
In numerous realms, the US attempt to disguise their military technology
progress. They possess a hypersonic drone whose air intake is controlled by a
similar process. On the photographs they show, the stealth inducing air intakes
could absolutely not function if the plane were to move at supersonic speeds.
The X-47A
American documents are generally mute about the speeds of these planes, but even
if they were stealthy, one can hardly imagine the Americans constructing
subsonic combat drones !
These few elements, (but there are many more, particularly concerning microwave
weapons, crowd control systems, etc.), may attract the reader's attention to the
fact that the US might indeed well have acquired a considerable lead in matters
of weaponry by using information extracted from UFO observation and reverse
engineering of retrieved wrecks.
I agree with Dr. Greer. I think that as soon as the United States disposed of
directed energy weapons, they deliberately shot down UFO's in order to analyse
them.
Why the US are suspected to possess antimatter bombs.
The 'flux compression" generators, such as those tested by Sakharov in the early
50's, are now reaching public knowledge. They are the generators which equipped
the E-bombs and cruise missiles used during the Gulf war. Specialists are aware
that these generators (see annex &&&) can also be used to compress objects at
very high pressures (25 megabars in 1952) and to accelerate them at very high
speeds (50 km/s in 1952). Towards the end of the 60's, the Americans considered
working these systems by using low power atom bombs (1kt of TNT) as explosive.
The pressures reached were so considerable that they managed, in this kind of
"laboratory", to reproduce conditions similar to the Big Bang, matter then
muting into antimatter. The energy production turned out to be one hundred times
greater than what was expected. This was kept secret. The Russians and the
Chinese later tried to re-enact those experiences, but they failed because of
lack of superconductors of adequate quality.
The Americans managed to separate the produced antimatter from matter and to
confine it in magnetic bottles. They eventually used it for propulsion, for such
as a disc shaped drone, operational since 2000, which can travel at Mach 10 in
dense air, and which they attempt to keep secret. This object works along the
lines described in annex 2. If one excepts stationary flight without air blast,
which comes under "antigravitation", and sharp angle turns, it appears that
Americans have almost managed to reproduce, thanks to MHD, the behaviour of
inter-atmospheric cruising UFO's. They are now attempting farther to develop
this technology, which would give them access to star to star travel. We do not
know if they have made any significant progress in that direction, though some
believe they have. If such were the case, this would jeopardise the future of
humanity because extraterrestrials would probably not tolerate that such
barbarians as we are should go and give neighbouring civilisations a pain in the
neck.
In the mean time, Americans use small quantities of antimatter to accelerate
silicon vapour up to 500 km/s in MHD accelerators used for space propulsion.
With such boosters, they have been able to accelerate space probes at speeds of
up to 100 km/s and accomplish a survey of the Solar System, nearly complete
since five years. They have been testing antimatter bombs in which very powerful
charges were synthesised in situ, at the moment of impact. The first trials of
these entirely oversized bombs, too powerful for Earth tests, were done by
sending them off to the Sun. To do this, very high specific impulse MHD
propelled bombs have been launched on trajectories at a wide angle to the
Ecliptic plane in order to get merged with a known family of comets. Trials were
continued with shots on Jupiter. There again, the bomb modules were directed in
such a way as to be mistaken for cometary debris. Initially loaded on board the
military Atlantis shuttle, the modules were conveyed on site by an MHD propelled
cargo which was then self-destroyed. The modules created a magnetosphere which
simulated cometary degassing. They penetrated Jupiter's high atmosphere at 100
km/s thanks to their MHD shield system. Thermonuclear compressed antimatter
synthesis, followed by instantaneous explosion caused the impacts to be mistaken
for comet fragments.
Later launches were aimed at Jupiter's satellites, such as Io and Europa. On
each of those occasions, Galileo, which had been sent into orbit precisely to
monitor the trials, failed to transmit the pictures to Earth, at least according
to the official version. It suffered a number of failures depriving earthlings
of close images of Jupiter's satellites.
An open question.
The purpose of such firings remains mysterious; are they meant to be anti-comet
weapons ? Some astronomers believe that, when the Solar System was formed, a
telluric planet has been ejected by tide effect on a very eccentric, long period
orbit (2000 - 3000 years), at a wide angle to the Ecliptic. This planet would in
addition have been reduced to a vast number of fragments while passing inside
the Roche sphere of the object from which it was ejected. The periodic return of
this swarm of fragments, the size of comets or asteroids and thus undetectable
at any greater distance than that of Jupiter, might cause some problems. Would
aliens have delivered to the Americans means of accelerating their scientific
and technical know-how in order to enable them to master the destruction of such
objects between 2020 and 2030 ? Would the Roswell wreck have been a fake,
purposely abandoned to trigger off this acceleration ? Every hypothesis may be
considered. One must bear in mind that if such a risk were to exist it would be
necessary to launch on a collision course with an object moving at 40 km/s; a
conventional propulsion would be useless because the shot would next have to
turn around to travel in convoy with the target. It would then have to bore a
pathway with an antimatter spurt of several kilometres to go and explode a
payload of several thousand megatons at the centre of the object in order to
transform it into debris each less than one meter in diameter, which would burn
out in the atmosphere. Are the shots fired at Jupiter and Io and Europa part of
such a plan ?
As a matter of fact, we know nothing about our Solar System and the future of
our Earth. Here in France, our group has received more than one telephone call
warning of approaching comets, the messages each time including accurate
perihelion dates long before the objects could be detected by Earth-bound
telescopes.
About anti-gravitation.
Research in theoretical cosmology which we have published, inspired by
information received through alien contacts, has led us to build a cosmological
model based on two universes, which develops ideas put forward by Andrei
Sakharov in 1976 : the twin universe cosmology. We believe the latter also to
have been in contact with aliens. Just read the strange end terms of his speech,
which was read by his lady friend Helena Bonaire in Sweden on receiving the
Nobel Prize. This model consists of a two-fold universe or double-universe.
Australian researchers Foot and Volkas today follow a similar path, calling it
"mirror-universes" (papers published in Physics Review). We have shown that the
"apparent mass" of the "twin universe" was negative, i.e. twin matter repels
ours while two particles of twin matter attract each other, in accordance with
Newton's law. This repulsion explains the re-acceleration of the expansion of
our universe, while it slows down the expansion of the twin.
When interstellar vessels cruise over huge distances, they use the twin as a
sort of "express subway". In this universe, which is extremely rarefied in
regions adjacent to ours, distances are shortened and the speed of light is
high. This makes space travel possible, subject to the principle : "it is
illegal to exceed the speed of light of the universe in which one is
travelling". One American research team is working on an idea based on
attempting locally to modify the value of the speed of light; the "warp driving
concept". Our approach is different and far more advanced. With the help of
aliens, it has taken us years just to begin understanding how it works and it
would require pages to describe. In principle, the vehicle's mass must be
transferred to the twin universe. When this operation takes place near the
Earth, the latter becomes invisible to the craft but acts on it as a negative,
repulsive mass. If the stations in our universe and in the adjacent region if
the twin are rapidly alternated, this is not detected by an observer, however in
one phase the vessel drops under the Earth's attraction, while in the other it
rises under the Earth's repulsion. Globally this amounts to an apparent
cancellation of the vessel's weight, whichever it's mass may be. This is our
interpretation of what people call anti-gravitation. We do not know whether
aliens have given earthlings the tip about those techniques.
Conclusion.
Let us stick to what we know already; we feel highly concerned with Dr. Greer's
text. It seems clear that a group of humans are holders of elements of science
and techniques which are far ahead of the rest of the world. How did they
acquire this knowledge and why ? Is it just a consequence of the crash of an
alien craft at Roswell ? Is there some much more complex plan behind all this ?
Have there been contacts between aliens and this group ? What is the agenda of
the ones and the others ? Is the hegemony and domination of this group of humans
over the rest of the planet just the consequence of an attempt at helping
Humanity to survive the next passage of a swarm of planet fragments ? We care to
know. Becoming conscious, at last, that they are not alone, would men acquire
some wisdom and, using the technology which makes it possible, turn their planet
into an Eden ?
Whichever way, we think the time has come to bring those who hold the secrets to
come clean and such is the meaning of our approach to the Disclosure Project.
December 2002
Pr. Jean-Pierre Petit,
Directeur de Recherche au CNRS,
Astrophysicist, specialist in MHD and theoretical cosmology.
(André Dufour, translator)
References :
(1) J.P.Petit : "Is supersonic flight possible ?" Eigth Inter. Conf. on MHD
Electr. Power Generation. Moscow 1983.
(2) J.P.Petit & B.Lebrun : "Shock wave cancellation in a gas by Lorentz force
action". Ninth Inter. Conf. On MHD Electr. Power Generation Meeting. Tsukuba,
Japan, 1986
(3) B.Lebrun & J.P.Petit : "Shock wave annihilation by MHD action in supersonic
flows. Quasi-one dimensional steady analysis and thermal blockage". European
Journal of Mechanics; B/Fluids, 8 , n°2, pp.163-178, 1989
(4) B.Lebrun & J.P.Petit : "Shock wave annihilation by MHD action in supersonic
flows. Two-dimensional steady non-isentropic analysis. Anti-shock criterion, and
shock tube simulations for isentropic flows". European Journal of Mechanics,
B/Fluids, 8 , pp.307-326, 1989
(5) B.Lebrun : "Approche théorique de la suppression des ondes de choc se
formant autour d'un obstacle effilé placé dans un écoulement d'argon ionisé. Phd
n° 233. Université de Poitiers, France, 1990.
(6) B.Lebrun & J.P.Petit : "Theoretical analysis of shock wave anihilation by
lorentz force field". International MHD symposium, Pékin 1990.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]