It's hard to answer with a boolean, but yes, I think the team provides a
safe enough environment to respond to this accurately. It may be safer to
reduce the scale to "not confident", "comfortable", "expert". We haven't
decided whether these ratings would be done individually, one-on-one with
the team's manager, or as a group voting to show what they think their
colleagues are strong at...

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 5:25 PM, David H. <dmalloc@...> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 4:24 PM, D. André Dhondt
> <d.andre.dhondt@... <d.andre.dhondt%40gmail.com>> wrote:
> > From the perspective of supporting energized work, helping our team gel,
> and
> > for nurturing individual developer growth, my team is currently building
> a
> > model for identifying and valuing individual contributions. Ultimately
> each
> > developer will end up with a radar chart (
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radar_chart) that highlights that person's
> > strengths in the team, and can help others know who to emulate or learn
> > from.
>
> I take it your team is inj an exceptionally safe environment and
> people will actually answer such a chart truthfully?
>
> -d
>
> --
> Sent from gmail so do not trust this communication.
> Do not send me sensitive information here, ask for my none-gmail accounts.
>
> "Therefore the considerations of the intelligent always include both
> benefit and harm." - Sun Tzu
>
>



--
D. André Dhondt
mobile: 001 33 671 034 984


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]