-----Original Message-----
From: Delila <watertiger13@...>
To: faceblind@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, Nov 15, 2009 1:07 pm
Subject: Re: [faceblind] Re: Communication ideas
































----- Original Message -----

From: "Joni DaNerd" <jonipinkney@...>



>

> Sorry, but I see no humor, wry or otherwise, in the first few
paragraphs

> of your message, and I am writing to you privately about this.



*Hmm, then why am I reading this here? :)



>

> As for the second part, young girls dressed as prostitutes, how young
are

> we talking here? (I often find the term "young girl" confusing, as
"young

> boy" would generally refer to a male child under age 10 or so; while

> "young girl" may refer to child, or to a woman under 30 or so.)



*I have a problem with that terminology, too. Like you I consider a
'young

girl' to be a young female child. Oh well...



> If the "young girls" are pre-pubescent, this is definitely sick and
wrong,

> as it is taboo in our society and most western societies to attach
sexual

> significance to children who have not yet attained puberty.



*Here in the US they do so even if they're fully developed. They
consider a

guy a pedophile if he has sex with a 16- or 17-year-old. I don't get
this

mindset, either. On the other hand, if the fully developed girl is 12
or 13

(some girls start very early, I did), then she should be considered

off-limits sexually.



> But then, you say this is was in a casino, so they would have had to
be at

> least 18 or 21, depending on the local laws



*That's what I was thinking, too. At 18+ a revealing outfit is fine, if

that's what the young woman chooses to wear.



D.