Skip to search.
fmeainfo · FMEA Info Centre

Group Information

  • Members: 511
  • Category: Other
  • Founded: Feb 8, 2000
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 551 - 580 of 682   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
551 Ram Varmha
varmha Offline Send Email
Jul 4, 2006
7:41 am
I understand that the RPN numbers are obtained by multiplying S x O x D. Is the multiplication rule in effect because we are assuming that the three rated...
552 Sam Lazzara
sam@... Send Email
Jul 5, 2006
8:32 am
Dear Ram, I realize that most people multiply, but I have found that addition works better since most engineers (including myself) cannot multiply very well ...
553 fmeacat Offline Send Email Jul 19, 2006
2:05 pm
Hi All, I'm new to this group and want to start with the following question: Is it a good idea to implement fmea for software development? At which point will...
554 Sokic, Ivan
ivan.sokic Offline Send Email
Jul 20, 2006
4:14 pm
In automotive industry, there is no reference to Software FMEA neither in QS9000 nor in VDA4.2. It is typically not required (sometimes also not recommended)...
555 jim123hen Offline Send Email Jul 24, 2006
2:29 pm
Hi, Sorry it is typical in use at the automobile industry for software. I know some companies that use FMEA for Unit Control Software as standard development...
556 Aaron Chamberlain
aaron.cham@... Send Email
Jul 24, 2006
2:31 pm
Actually, you do multiply when doing an FMEA in the automotive industry. S is the severity index (on a scale from 1 to 10), which is the relative severity of...
557 Ram Varmha
varmha Offline Send Email
Jul 24, 2006
2:34 pm
Sam, Thank you for your response and I can follow how your method will work well. I see the multiplication approach in most every write up I come across. I was...
558 Sokic, Ivan
ivan.sokic Offline Send Email
Jul 24, 2006
9:01 pm
I agree that Software may be considered during the System-FMAE which itself is not a Software-FMEA since it also includes other system elements (electronics,...
559 Madhusudan Desai
aurocomp Offline Send Email
Jul 25, 2006
8:01 pm
Hello, As Mr. Ivan wants to know if there are any FMEA softwares we are pleased to inform you that we have developed a FMEA basd software that is for the...
560 KUMAR.MUTHU@...
t.muthukumar Offline Send Email
Jul 25, 2006
8:07 pm
We are following the same method (multiplication of S, D & O for calculating RPN). However, while prioritizing the failure modes to be addressed, failure modes...
561 gerry@...
sailorseaboat Offline Send Email
Jul 25, 2006
8:08 pm
Sam, Ram, Yes the motor industry uses multiplication. When I did my FMEA training with a major motor manufacturer in the 80,s, one of the reasons given was...
562 Joanne Davies
strimmedfrog Offline Send Email
Jul 26, 2006
1:09 pm
I would like to know the reason for addition working 'better.' 1+1+1=3 1x1x1=1 As for most engineers not being able to multply, then how on earth did they get...
563 Ram Varmha
varmha Offline Send Email
Jul 26, 2006
1:10 pm
Gerry, Sam, I was able to establish from reliable sources that multiplication of SxOxD is correct because they are the three actors that affect or are affected...
564 John G. Ochs
johno1247 Offline Send Email
Jul 26, 2006
1:10 pm
... x D. ... the three rated events S, O and D are independent of each other? ... probability as well? ... While I am most familiar with the multiplication...
565 Ram Varmha
varmha Offline Send Email
Jul 26, 2006
1:12 pm
Dear Alan, Your last statement refers to RPN being 0 as the lowest and 1000 as the highest. I presume that "0" is a typo and should be "1" instead? Regards, ...
566 Ram Varmha
varmha Offline Send Email
Jul 27, 2006
7:59 am
Dear Joanne, That is my point also! There has to be a consistent, "mathematical" approach to calculating the PRNs in FMEA. In the particular instance where the...
567 wh_lai168 Offline Send Email Jul 27, 2006
7:59 am
Hi, Is that wrong to use PFMEA on the existing manufacturing process? Thanks....
568 eric-sl_phoon@... Send Email Aug 5, 2006
8:31 pm
FMEA is a living document and reviewing the FMEA document will improve the process. So it is not wrong to use PFMEA on the existing process, and in fact it...
569 John Ochs
johno1247 Offline Send Email
Aug 5, 2006
8:31 pm
I also agree with the importance of a high "S" value on its own. In my experience a S value of 10 was reserved for safety issues only and any potential failure...
570 John Ochs
johno1247 Offline Send Email
Aug 5, 2006
8:32 pm
Not at all. I suspect that most PFMEA's are performed on existing processes as part of an overall process improvement or poke-yoke activity. Works equally well...
571 jim123hen Offline Send Email Aug 5, 2006
8:34 pm
Hi, an other example for use at siemens: http://www.sipi61508.com/ciks/mackel1.pdf Cheers Jim...
572 Dubuissez matthieu
mdubuissez Offline Send Email
Aug 28, 2006
7:19 am
Hi all, We did the ISO TS audit and one of the non conformity is the ranking of the evaluation. In the Column "Current control" (for Detection) we can put...
573 vaishali.hegde Offline Send Email Sep 7, 2006
6:52 am
Hi, While conducting a FMEA session, if different participants select different severity rankings, how do you decide on the "final" severity ranking? For eg....
574 Robert Thonissen
robert_thoni... Offline Send Email
Sep 8, 2006
6:47 am
Hello, Is is normal that you can have long discussions about the correct severity ranking. Most of the discussions are not about the higher rankings 9, 10 and...
575 Ram Varmha
varmha Offline Send Email
Sep 11, 2006
6:57 am
Dear Robert, Your approach seems to be an acceptable way of resolving the issue of differing rankings. Another approach we have used rather successfully is to:...
576 Soumyanath Chatterjee
optiman_tux Offline Send Email
Sep 11, 2006
11:28 am
I had adopted a system of clearly displaying the factors affecting severity, e.g. 1. Impared performance 2. loss of function, but system will run ... 5....
577 Robert Thonissen
robert_thoni... Offline Send Email
Sep 12, 2006
7:12 am
Hello, I fully agree with your comment not to average the figures and go for the worst case scenario. Importend is that we make clear rules, which are...
578 marametra Offline Send Email Sep 21, 2006
6:01 am
hi, I am new to these arguments. in these days I have tried to create fmea of an electronic circuit. Now I would want to add the data in order to obtain a...
579 Sugata Adhikari
sugataadhikari Offline Send Email
Sep 22, 2006
12:37 pm
Dear friends 1) Please help me in finding FMEA Examples from Telecommunication Service Provider Industry 2) Can you please suggest links where I can find...
580 Twincy Nirmala
ntwincy@... Send Email
Nov 1, 2006
3:23 pm
Hi everyone, I am been assigned to do a Design FMEA of a pneumatic system used in Aircarfts. It has different levels of components . Main assembly Sub Assembly...
Messages 551 - 580 of 682   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help