Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
forcefieldpropulsionphysics · forcefield propulsion
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Re: Inertia and extracting anacceleration forc...   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #586 of 2363 |
[forcefieldpropulsionphysics] Re: Inertia and extracting anacceleration forc...

Caroline,

Your intuition is 180 degrees out. In this reproducable experiment,
the rotation induced in the second disc is always opposite the rotation
of the first. Why is that?

Neil

"c.h.thompson" wrote:

> Hi Jhan
>
> My intuition says the opposite: one rotating disc will try and make the
> other rotate in the SAME direction! As you say, we need to suck it and see.
>
> Caroline
>
> ***********************
>
> Jhan Davis' message, 16:2:00:
>
> Claude, Ross, et al -
> The technology of this is still something we're all thinking about,
> but what I'm getting a good feel for now is that anytime you spin a disk,
> you're just *supposed* to have another disk, as physically equivalent as
> possible to the first, positioned at some distance from it along the axis of
> rotation, spin planes parallel, positioned so that they share the same axis
> of rotation, but are loosely-coupled (not rigid axis) so that they can
> rotate
> separately. I'm hesitant about saying that they should be spaced 2pi radii
> apart, or 2e radii apart, along the rotation axis, but we should attempt to
> find values that work. There's bound to be a numeric trick in it. Now for
> the fun part...
> I'm sensing that clockwise rotation of one disk "should" induce
> counterclockwise rotation in the other, & vice-versa, when they're properly
> spaced apart. This is related to the concept of energy flow within the
> Compton Radius vortex. Also to the connectedness of all things in the
> universe. Maybe subatomic particles have this characteristic. In which
> case
> I'd also expect the universe, as a super-particle, to have the same singular
> topological feature. Let's build the doggone thing and see what happens!
> - Jhan
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To Post a message, send it to: forcefieldpropulsionphysics@eGroups.com
> To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to:
forcefieldpropulsionphysics-unsubscribe@eGroups.com
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WANT FREE MAGAZINES?
> Sample over 500 magazines in 30 categories-- all for FREE at
> FreeShop.com, your source for thousands of free and trial offers!
> http://click.egroups.com/1/1610/2/_/187292/_/950708565/
>
> eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/forcefieldpropulsionphysics
> http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications




Wed Feb 16, 2000 3:11 pm

rnboyd@...
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #586 of 2363 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Hi Jhan My intuition says the opposite: one rotating disc will try and make the other rotate in the SAME direction! As you say, we need to suck it and see. ...
c.h.thompson
c.h.thompson@...
Send Email
Feb 16, 2000
1:38 pm

I agree with Jahn. I have an explanation for why the effect happens. Does anyone else? Neil...
Robert Neil Boyd
rnboyd@...
Send Email
Feb 16, 2000
3:23 pm

Caroline, Your intuition is 180 degrees out. In this reproducable experiment, the rotation induced in the second disc is always opposite the rotation of the...
Robert Neil Boyd
rnboyd@...
Send Email
Feb 16, 2000
3:25 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help