Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the forcefieldpropulsionphysics
group.

   File        : /String Theory Predictions On The Zero Point Vacuum State.pdf
   Uploaded by : paultrr2000 <paultrr2000@...>
   Description : String Theory Predictions on the Zero Point Vacuum

You can access this file at the URL

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forcefieldpropulsionphysics/files/String%20Theory%\
20Predictions%20On%20The%20Zero%20Point%20Vacuum%20State.pdf

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit

http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files

Regards,

paultrr2000 <paultrr2000@...>

QUESTION:  DO POLITICIANS ALWAYS JUST GIVE LIP SERVICE?

With lawmakers scrambling to wrap up a massive spending package
before Thanksgiving, NASA Administrator Sean O'Keefe complained
Friday about efforts to strip $200 million from the international
space station budget.

The Senate passed a $15.3 billion budget for NASA on Tuesday, but
not before reducing the $1.7 billion President Bush wants to spend
on the space station.

In July, the House approved a $15.5 billion budget for NASA,
slightly more than President Bush had requested.

The agency's spending plan is in the hands of Senate and House
negotiators, who are trying to hammer out a gigantic $280 billion
package to fund NASA and dozens of other federal agencies for the
2004 budget year, which began on Oct. 1.

Senate appropriators argue that a reduction in the space station
budget is justified because NASA is getting help from its Russian
partners, who are providing spacecraft to keep the orbiting outpost
going while American shuttles are grounded.

The station project also has saved some money since the Feb. 1
Columbia shuttle accident because it has reduced the station crew
from three to two, the Senate Appropriations Committee said in its
report on the bill.

With reserves of more than $250 million, the report said, NASA
should be able to cover "this modest reduction."

The Senate version of the spending bill also took away $20 million
that NASA planned to spend on a project to explore the icy moons of
Jupiter. At the same time, senators added $50 million to NASA's
aeronautics research budget and moved some other funds around.

One of the problems identified by the Columbia Accident
Investigation Board was the unpredictability of NASA's fluctuating
funding levels year to year.   Yet, here we see the Government
running things their common way in total disreguard to those
findings.  This seems to suggest that our own Politicians tend to be
at least part of the problem that is wrong with the space program.
It also tends to send a message that these same Politicians care
little about the same safety and modernizing of the space program
that they in public statements give lip service too.   Perhaps it is
time here that the American Public let their own voices be heard in
the next elections before we run into future repeats of the Columbia
accident or worse.

Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the forcefieldpropulsionphysics
group.

   File        : /Field Propulsion Drives and the Cosmological Constant.pdf
   Uploaded by : paultrr2000 <paultrr2000@...>
   Description : Field Propulsion Drives and the Cosmological Constant

You can access this file at the URL

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forcefieldpropulsionphysics/files/Field%20Propulsi\
on%20Drives%20and%20the%20Cosmological%20Constant.pdf

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit

http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files

Regards,

paultrr2000 <paultrr2000@...>

Gravity is electrical, is magnetic, and is the ratio of ions to atoms, ions
to magnetic fields. Finding the correct combination, I believe will be what
we are looking for. I also believe that to spin the ions under the craft /
object coupled with a high intensity  ultraviolate light for ion enhancement
will produce either +/- gravity depending on voltage applied.

On 7 Dec 2003 at 13:05, Joe May wrote:

> Gravity is electrical, is magnetic

Or the other way around: electricity is gravitational and magnetism
is gravitational too.

Some people try to discourage our thinking about other dimensions.
I wonder why?

ark

It was not my intention to ruffle feathers. It very well could be the other
way around. No one really knows.

Joe




----- Original Message -----
From: "Arkadiusz Jadczyk" <lark1@...>
To: <forcefieldpropulsionphysics@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 1:42 PM
Subject: Re: [forcefieldpropulsionphysics] Gravity


>
>
> On 7 Dec 2003 at 13:05, Joe May wrote:
>
> > Gravity is electrical, is magnetic
>
> Or the other way around: electricity is gravitational and magnetism
> is gravitational too.
>
> Some people try to discourage our thinking about other dimensions.
> I wonder why?
>
> ark
>
>
> To Post a message, send it to:   forcefieldpropulsionphysics@eGroups.com
>
> To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to:
forcefieldpropulsionphysics-unsubscribe@eGroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

see
http://www.mathpreprints.com/math/Preprint/paultrr/20040119/1/Evaluat
ion_of_Brane_World_Mach_Principles.pdf

----- Original Message -----

From: Paul Hoiland

To: forcefieldpropulsionphysics@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 8:45 AM

Subject: [forcefieldpropulsionphysics] On Mach's Principles

see
http://www.mathpreprints.com/math/Preprint/paultrr/20040119/1/Evaluat
ion_of_Brane_World_Mach_Principles.pdf



To Post a message, send it to:   forcefieldpropulsionphysics@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: forcefieldpropulsionphysics-unsubscribe@eGroups.com

---

Yahoo! Groups Links

• To visit your group on the web, go to:
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forcefieldpropulsionphysics/
   
• To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  forcefieldpropulsionphysics-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
   
• Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Well, here's why they should never put an 'I' in front of "QM."  Man, I just
love this:

"Schrφdinger's cat illuminates something sticky at the heart of quantum
mechanics.  The most successful physical theory of all time, it has been
used to construct or understand everything from lasers to snowflakes.  But
pure contradiction lies at its heart, because in the quantum world particles
can be in multiple locations simultaneously, and doing incompatible things,
and in multiple states, and acting in ways that make you wish you were not a
quantum theorist.  This is called 'superposition'--and superposition
persists until somebody looks into the cat box, atwhich point the
possibilities collapse into something real and classical--something we can
hear, touch, feel, see, and maybe even understand.

"According to quantum theory, superposition should be possible at any scale,
but in the real world, things like keys, cats, and cars don't bilocate.  If
quantum theory holds true at the tiny scale of photons and electrons, when
does it stop working and why?"

(Jill Neimark, "Save Schrφdinger's Cat," SCIENCE & SPIRIT, 2002;
http://www.science-spirit.org/articles/articledetail.cfm?article_id=387)

I've got a possible - and, surprise-surprise, *logical* - answer for Ms.
Neimark: Maybe QM "stops working" at the macro-level because it _never
worked at all_.  One of the hallmarks of a bad theory is the continual
addition of implausible adjustments to force the theory to fit the data.  If
you insist on doing that, then *of course* your theory is going to become
the "most successful physical theory of all time"; how could it *not* become
that if you keep padding it with ad hoc components to stretch its
explanatory power?

But that hardly means you've proved anything.  If "pure contradiction lies
at its heart," then quite simply QM cannot be a true model of reality.  The
notion of superposition is *logically impossible*.  If a theory leads you
directly into the logically absurd - then, hello, why wouldn't you come up
with another theory...?  Why on earth has the Scientific Establishment
embraced a logically impossible theory?

Regards,
Andy

The notion of superposition is *logically impossible*. 

 

Take a shot at this -- define superposition.  Make a resonable effort to understand it first (be a good scientist), then take a shot a definition and then a critical analysis. 

 

Regards

 

Jack Martinelli

 

http://www.martinelli.org

 

Here is good news, original author and inventor of "Electric Rocket"
is around and well, his name is Thomas F. Kennedy, he patented his
Electric Rocket and is making it public domain, so everybody owns it.

Here is the link, but since Geocities has limited
amount of bandwidth for each site, I'll just copy
text on that page, it is one page web site with
announcement, and one JPG image which is copy
of first page for a patent.
That image I will send to Jean-Louis, perpehs
he will put it on his web site, so everybody
can see it.
Here is the link to Thomas's web page:

http://www.geocities.com/warpcore91

All the way bellow is text from web page,
but first let me type few words from that JPG image
so you have minimum necesary information before
it gets to somebodys web site:
------------------------------------------
Provisional Patent
Capacitor Array Thruster
Application Number 60/460,344
Filling Date: 04/04/2003
If Reguired, Foreign Licence Granted
6/11/2003

Device for converting electricity directly into thrust.

It relies on the Biefeld-Brown Effect and dielectric
pressure to produce thrust. It consists of a cylindrical
array with rings of dielectric of equal thickness.
Thickness can be 2 inches or whatever the dielectric used
will allow for effective operation.
Four + and - layers are shown here, but more can be used...
------------------------------------------


That it, there is more on image,
and now the whole text found on Thomas's page:


---------------------------------------------

Prior experience has taught me that nobody can make money from this
invention, Because it works TOO well.
but there are always greedy, stupid people who will try
to steal it anyway.


By publishing this I make it PUBLIC DOMAIN.
No one person owns it; EVERYBODY owns it.
I registered the invention with the US Patent Office,
to prevent anyone from claiming it as their own.




CLICK HERE FOR FULL SIZE
PATENT PAGE


You can also eliminate the outer dielectric and just stagger
the INNER dielectric/plate ring diameters. If you do this you might
have to decrease the THICKNESS of the smaller-inner-diameter rings
to keep surface areas/volumes the same between + and - dielectric/plate
rings. You will still need the weaker dielectric filling the central cavity.
You might also use smaller inner [and outer] diameters for the positive
dielectric rings and larger I.D and O.D. for the negative rings.
Also insulate with ASPHALT, like T.T. Brown did.
Tar will not hold it steady enough.


Original papers and drawings I distributed
in 1991 that someone put on the Internet:
http://www.amasci.com/caps/capwarp.html


"Serrano's recent patent for a similar device."
http://www.amasci.com/caps/capatnt.html


Here's Serrano's device as built and tested
by Jean Naudin:
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/sfptv1.htm


Mr. Serrano used a wedge configuration similar
to my first design.
In Serrano's demonstration device, Substitute Titanium Dioxide
for the Styrofoam and Titanium Oxide for the air spaces.
Or just use the best dielectrics you can.
Remember that the wedges must have a higher dielectric rating
than the dielectric used to fill the "spaces."
Styrofoam has a rating of 2.5K and air is 1K.
Titanium Dioxide is 110K and Titanium Oxide is 55K.
The stronger dielectric should have roughly twice the rating
of the weaker one.



I (postal) mailed my papers to many different people and
was featured in a small publication, "Hover News."
It was in August of 1991 and I did not own a computer.


I originally thought I was reverse engineering an "Electric Rocket"
made by T.Townsend Brown, but I later discovered that it was a new
design that used the electro-kinetic (Biefeld-Brown Effect) more
efficiently than Dr. Brown's early 'Gravitator'.
At the time I knew virtually nothing about T. Brown, except for a brief
glimpse of the "Electric Rocket" on Local Access Cable on an
amateur program called, "The Ray of Discovery."
I didn't even know Townsend Brown's Name; I only knew that the
device was "an electrical grid." I became obsessed with finding out
how to make one.


Electrogravity will give us space travel and free energy.
T. Townsend Brown developed capacitor warp drive systems generations ago.
He first discovered the Biefield-Brown (Electro Kinetic effect) and built
Gravitators that
actually worked!
The US Navy classified his flying saucers (Flying Disks) the instant he
demonstrated them.
Isn't it time to release suppressed inventions and change the world?
Suppressed Science is wasted science.

----------------------------------------------


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway
http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/

----- Original Message -----

From: Vencislav Bujic

To: free_energy@yahoogroups.com ; aggroup@yahoogroups.com ; Antigravity@yahoogroups.com ; blazelabs@yahoogroups.com ; forcefieldpropulsionphysics@yahoogroups.com ; EVGRAY@yahoogroups.com ; nuenergy@yahoogroups.com ; spacepeople@yahoogroups.com

Cc: BILLB@...

Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2004 9:06 AM

Subject: [forcefieldpropulsionphysics] Original author of "Electric rocket" found, he patented it

Here is good news, original author and inventor of "Electric Rocket"
is around and well, his name is Thomas F. Kennedy, he patented his
Electric Rocket and is making it public domain, so everybody owns it.

Here is the link, but since Geocities has limited
amount of bandwidth for each site, I'll just copy
text on that page, it is one page web site with
announcement, and one JPG image which is copy
of first page for a patent.
That image I will send to Jean-Louis, perpehs
he will put it on his web site, so everybody
can see it.
Here is the link to Thomas's web page:

http://www.geocities.com/warpcore91

All the way bellow is text from web page,
but first let me type few words from that JPG image
so you have minimum necesary information before
it gets to somebodys web site:
------------------------------------------
Provisional Patent
Capacitor Array Thruster
Application Number 60/460,344
Filling Date: 04/04/2003
If Reguired, Foreign Licence Granted
6/11/2003

Device for converting electricity directly into thrust.

It relies on the Biefeld-Brown Effect and dielectric
pressure to produce thrust. It consists of a cylindrical
array with rings of dielectric of equal thickness.
Thickness can be 2 inches or whatever the dielectric used
will allow for effective operation.
Four + and - layers are shown here, but more can be used...
------------------------------------------


That it, there is more on image,
and now the whole text found on Thomas's page:


---------------------------------------------

Prior experience has taught me that nobody can make money from this
invention, Because it works TOO well.
but there are always greedy, stupid people who will try
to steal it anyway.


By publishing this I make it PUBLIC DOMAIN.
No one person owns it; EVERYBODY owns it.
I registered the invention with the US Patent Office,
to prevent anyone from claiming it as their own.




CLICK HERE FOR FULL SIZE
PATENT PAGE


You can also eliminate the outer dielectric and just stagger
the INNER dielectric/plate ring diameters. If you do this you might
have to decrease the THICKNESS of the smaller-inner-diameter rings
to keep surface areas/volumes the same between + and - dielectric/plate
rings. You will still need the weaker dielectric filling the central cavity.
You might also use smaller inner [and outer] diameters for the positive
dielectric rings and larger I.D and O.D. for the negative rings.
Also insulate with ASPHALT, like T.T. Brown did.
Tar will not hold it steady enough.


Original papers and drawings I distributed
in 1991 that someone put on the Internet:
http://www.amasci.com/caps/capwarp.html


"Serrano's recent patent for a similar device."
http://www.amasci.com/caps/capatnt.html


Here's Serrano's device as built and tested
by Jean Naudin:
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/sfptv1.htm


Mr. Serrano used a wedge configuration similar
to my first design.
In Serrano's demonstration device, Substitute Titanium Dioxide
for the Styrofoam and Titanium Oxide for the air spaces.
Or just use the best dielectrics you can.
Remember that the wedges must have a higher dielectric rating
than the dielectric used to fill the "spaces."
Styrofoam has a rating of 2.5K and air is 1K.
Titanium Dioxide is 110K and Titanium Oxide is 55K.
The stronger dielectric should have roughly twice the rating
of the weaker one.



I (postal) mailed my papers to many different people and
was featured in a small publication, "Hover News."
It was in August of 1991 and I did not own a computer.


I originally thought I was reverse engineering an "Electric Rocket"
made by T.Townsend Brown, but I later discovered that it was a new
design that used the electro-kinetic (Biefeld-Brown Effect) more
efficiently than Dr. Brown's early 'Gravitator'.
At the time I knew virtually nothing about T. Brown, except for a brief
glimpse of the "Electric Rocket" on Local Access Cable on an
amateur program called, "The Ray of Discovery."
I didn't even know Townsend Brown's Name; I only knew that the
device was "an electrical grid." I became obsessed with finding out
how to make one.


Electrogravity will give us space travel and free energy.
T. Townsend Brown developed capacitor warp drive systems generations ago.
He first discovered the Biefield-Brown (Electro Kinetic effect) and built
Gravitators that
actually worked!
The US Navy classified his flying saucers (Flying Disks) the instant he
demonstrated them.
Isn't it time to release suppressed inventions and change the world?
Suppressed Science is wasted science.

----------------------------------------------


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway
http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/


To Post a message, send it to:   forcefieldpropulsionphysics@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: forcefieldpropulsionphysics-unsubscribe@eGroups.com

Eugene Malove was shot dead two days ago, on 14 of may,
he is one more victim of physical vacuum energy research...

How sad...

Prayer:
Neka mu je laka zemlja i Carstvo Nebesko!


Vencislav


http://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=738

Dr. Eugene Mallove is dead
Posted on Saturday, May 15 @ 12:21:04 PDT by vlad



Shocking and tragic news from Steven B. Krivit:

It is with great sadness that we report the passing of Gene Mallove, who was
killed on May 14,
2004 apparently due to some sort of involvement with a property dispute. It is
considered by the
police to be a homicide and an investigation is underway.

Gene is survived by his wife Joanne, son Ethan and daughter Kim. No funeral
arrangements are known
at this time.


Gene Mallove, who, in his 1991 book "Fire from Ice: Searching for the Truth
behind the Cold Fusion
Furor," was the first to courageously and boldly express the truth behind cold
fusion, long before
any science journalist even dared to ask questions that challenged the
prevailing view. For 15
years, Gene maintained the cold fusion "torch" at great personal sacrifice,
which initially drew
many to learn the truth behind cold fusion.

Gene's generosity and commitment to a better world will be forever appreciated.
Christy Frazier,
the office manager at Infinite Energy (Phone 603-485-4700), or Steven Krivit at
New Energy Times
(310) 721-5919 may be contacted, however this is the limit of what is known at
this time.

Steven B. Krivit
New Energy Times
Los Angeles, California, USA
www.newenergytimes.com
Phone: (310) 470-8189
Fax: (310) 470-8190





__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! - Internet access at a great low price.
http://promo.yahoo.com/sbc/

CALL FOR PAPERS  

TIME THEORY AND APPLICATIONS
within the context of the 2005 WSEAS International Conference on
MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY

Udine, Italy January 20-22, 2005

Session organized and moderated by Prof. E.Macer-Story. 

You may submit papers according to WSEAS format & deadline directly to 

submissions@...;  fluidice@... , magickmirr@...

or through the WSEAS form above

Why nobody has an  interest in gravifugal flying
craft? It is experimentaly proved.
See:
http://www.geocities.com/agravity/ANTIGRAVITY.htm?



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250

-----Original Message-----
From: Petar Bosnic [mailto:agravity@...]
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 7:46 AM
To: forcefieldpropulsionphysics@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [forcefieldpropulsionphysics] gravifugal force

Why nobody has an  interest in gravifugal flying
craft? It is experimentaly proved.
See:
http://www.geocities.com/agravity/ANTIGRAVITY.htm?


           
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250


To Post a message, send it to:   forcefieldpropulsionphysics@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: forcefieldpropulsionphysics-unsubscribe@eGroups.com

Please visit:
http://www.geocities.com/agravity/ANTIGRAVITY.htm?


Jack Martinelli <jack@...> wrote:

> How about a moive of a sucessful levitation?
>   -----Original Message-----
>   From: Petar Bosnic [mailto:agravity@...]
>   Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 7:46 AM
>   To: forcefieldpropulsionphysics@yahoogroups.com
>   Subject: [forcefieldpropulsionphysics] gravifugal
> force
>
>
>   Why nobody has an  interest in gravifugal flying
>   craft? It is experimentaly proved.
>   See:
>   http://www.geocities.com/agravity/ANTIGRAVITY.htm?
>
>
>
>   __________________________________
>   Do you Yahoo!?
>   Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage
> less.
>   http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
>
>
>   To Post a message, send it to:
> forcefieldpropulsionphysics@eGroups.com
>
>   To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to:
> forcefieldpropulsionphysics-unsubscribe@eGroups.com
>
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>   Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>     a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
>
>
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forcefieldpropulsionphysics/
>
>     b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an
> email to:
>
>
forcefieldpropulsionphysics-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>     c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
> Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>




__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo

-----Original Message-----
From: Petar Bosnic [mailto:agravity@...]
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 11:19 AM
To: forcefieldpropulsionphysics@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [forcefieldpropulsionphysics] gravifugal force

Please visit:
http://www.geocities.com/agravity/ANTIGRAVITY.htm?


Jack Martinelli <jack@...> wrote:

> How about a moive of a sucessful levitation?
>   -----Original Message-----
>   From: Petar Bosnic [mailto:agravity@...]
>   Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 7:46 AM
>   To: forcefieldpropulsionphysics@yahoogroups.com
>   Subject: [forcefieldpropulsionphysics] gravifugal
> force
>
>
>   Why nobody has an  interest in gravifugal flying
>   craft? It is experimentaly proved.
>   See:
>   http://www.geocities.com/agravity/ANTIGRAVITY.htm?
>
>
>
>   __________________________________
>   Do you Yahoo!?
>   Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage
> less.
>   http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
>
>
>   To Post a message, send it to: 
> forcefieldpropulsionphysics@eGroups.com
>
>   To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to:
> forcefieldpropulsionphysics-unsubscribe@eGroups.com
>
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>   Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>     a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
>   
>
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forcefieldpropulsionphysics/
>
>     b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an
> email to:
>   
>
forcefieldpropulsionphysics-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>     c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
> Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>



           
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo


To Post a message, send it to:   forcefieldpropulsionphysics@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: forcefieldpropulsionphysics-unsubscribe@eGroups.com

To: antigravity@yahoogroups.com


Message to other people.
(New tekst in the middle and at the end of the
message)
Gravifugal flying craft is not something obsolete, as
was stated by one man. In the whole human hystory
there was not any gravifugal or antigravitational
device, neither any thing or theory similar to it.
There was only very stupid theories, based on the
following process of """thinking""" :
Falldowning of the diferent material things or devices
is something logical. However, something illogical and
unscientifical will levitate???!!! My God!!!???
!!!!!!??????
EG. devices constructed by T.T. Brown, de Palma, Searl
and many others.
It was "theoretical" base of mainly "antigravitational
devices"
Some people believed the solution of levitation is in
is human mind.
They wanted to employ the human mind to levitate human
body or some other things.
It means that our mind have to serve to us instead
horses, donkies, or instead of lifts and train(kamions
and tractors).
I do not believe the human mind would be satisfy with
that new job.
Human mind has quite different function.

In contrast to those devices gravifugal flying craft
was constructed in the base of classical physics and
by calculations.
The first conditions to construct the gravifugal
device was: to understand that antigravity do not
exist, and discovering gravifugal corce.
Fortunately it was discovered even by Newton. But
nobody up today had awarness ot that force, neither
its importance.
It is necessary to have some education to read my book
or article, or, at least inteligent and opened, free
mind, without bad prejudices.
Please visit my site:
http://www.geocities.com/agravity/ANTIGRAVITY.htm
Thank you.
Petrus
P. S.








__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today!
http://my.yahoo.com

Message to other people.
(New tekst in the middle and at the end of the
message)
Gravifugal flying craft is not something obsolete, as
was stated by one man. In the whole human hystory
there was not any gravifugal or antigravitational
device, neither any thing or theory similar to it.
There was only very stupid theories, based on the
following process of """thinking""" :
Falldowning of the diferent material things or devices
is something logical. However, something illogical and
unscientifical will levitate???!!! My God!!!???
!!!!!!??????
EG. devices constructed by T.T. Brown, de Palma, Searl
and many others.
It was "theoretical" base of mainly "antigravitational
devices"
Some people believed the solution of levitation is in
is human mind.
They wanted to employ the human mind to levitate human
body or some other things.
It means that our mind have to serve to us instead
horses, donkies, or instead of lifts and train(kamions
and tractors).
I do not believe the human mind would be satisfy with
that new job.
Human mind has quite different function.

In contrast to those devices gravifugal flying craft
was constructed in the base of classical physics and
by calculations.
The first conditions to construct the gravifugal
device was: to understand that antigravity do not
exist, and discovering gravifugal corce.
Fortunately it was discovered even by Newton. But
nobody up today had awarness ot that force, neither
its importance.
It is necessary to have some education to read my book
or article, or, at least inteligent and opened, free
mind, without bad prejudices.
Please visit my site:
http://www.geocities.com/agravity/ANTIGRAVITY.htm
Thank you.
Petrus
P. S.





__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the forcefieldpropulsionphysics
group.

   File        : /antigravity#1/ion3.jpg
   Uploaded by : may070240 <may5258@...>
   Description :

You can access this file at the URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forcefieldpropulsionphysics/files/antigravity%231/\
ion3.jpg

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files

Regards,

may070240 <may5258@...>

Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the forcefieldpropulsionphysics
group.

   File        : /antigravity#1/ion4.jpg
   Uploaded by : may070240 <may5258@...>
   Description :

You can access this file at the URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forcefieldpropulsionphysics/files/antigravity%231/\
ion4.jpg

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files

Regards,

may070240 <may5258@...>

Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the forcefieldpropulsionphysics
group.

   File        : /antigravity#1/ion5.jpg
   Uploaded by : may070240 <may5258@...>
   Description :

You can access this file at the URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forcefieldpropulsionphysics/files/antigravity%231/\
ion5.jpg

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files

Regards,

may070240 <may5258@...>

Professor Petar Bosnic Petrus
Langova 35, 10430 Samobor,
Croatia
You are free to reduce and transform this article into the form
suitable to publishing the in your magazine.
PARADOXES OF GRAVITY AND ANTIGRAVITY
AND GRAVIFUGAL REVOLUTION
(Problems related to what is known as antigravitation)

Basis for discussion and polemics.
Is it possible to produce // create the antigravitational force, to
levitate, or to rid oneself of  the effects of gravitation?
This is a question that has plagued the non-scientific and, to a
degree, the scientific world for centuries. Presented here are a few
brief views of the issue which have become crystallized during the
course of my research of this, mostly non-scientific, sphere of
human interest.

What is antigravitation?
Expressed in the simplest of terms, it should be some kind of force
which would oppose gravitation, annul it and make possible the
levitation of bodies.
For physicists, antigravitation is a nonsense, since no such mass
exists which could repel another mass, prevent the spread of
gravitation or, like Verne's Cavorite, isolate a body from its
influence. According to understanding available to date, this cannot
be achieved – either by way of anti-matter or by some field.
For SF writers antigravitation and levitation are very desirable,
but also so fantastic that their achievement and use by man are
regarded as impossible ?, that even authors of this field are not
too keen to write about those things, and they rarely do so. For
various "inventors" antigravitation is, just as it is for
constructors of a perpetuamobile, a possibility of achieving fame by
constructing some kind of anti-gravitational flying craft.

Meditative levitation
A large number of people, scientists included, believe that
levitation can be achieved only through meditation. They are of the
opinion that only the spirit can be so powerful it can make a body
levitate. This was supposedly confirmed by the levitation of Father
Giuseppe from Copertino in the 15th century, of St. Teresa of Αvila,
of Sri Aurobind and numerous other yogis. There are many people
today who are doing their best to achieve levitation in some such
manner – either by meditation or through will power – in the belief
they would thus attain a kind of divine state and a divine level of
existence. One can often see yogis and their disciples on TV hopping
around in a sitting position and declaring that to be levitation.
However, if we think about such meditative levitation, and what
would be achieved by it – and do so without prejudice and illusions –
  we would see the following.
One's spirit would become capable of raising and lifting a physical
weight, or rather the body in which it resides, but also various
other objects. This is a task that once, long ago, was performed
slaves, horses and donkeys, and today by cranes, trucks, trains,
etc. It is therefore hardly likely that the human spirit, even if it
were to achieve that kind of levitation, would be content with its
new task, and indeed regard it as a divine achievement. So much for
meditative levitation.

Antigravitational devices
A fundamental and very often painfully confirmed human experience is
that physical bodies are heavy and that they tend to fall. The
experience of weight and falling has been confirmed so many times
that it is inadvertently identified with the sense and internal
logic of things themselves. The falling of material objects is
simply something that is understandable, logical, "normal".
It is on that premise that one very interesting, unconscious or, at
best, semi-conscious "conclusion", or to be more precise, a
fantastic nimbleness of thought has been achieved: If falling is
something logical and understandable // meaningful, then something
which is meaningless is not going to fall.
This nimbleness of thought became a "theoretical", or rather
psychological, basis for a large number of "antigravitational
devices" to be found on the Internet. The best known "projects" of
this kind  are those by T. Brown, J. Searl, de Palma, E. Podkletnov,
and numerous other authors. There are thousands of them. The
characteristic common to those devices is that the internal movement
of their parts and forces they have at their disposal are arranged
totally ineffectually, non-functionally, or in complete disregard of
the laws of physics, indeed of absurd relations. "Explanations"
provided with the projects of those devices usually suggest that
they are something revolutionary and new.
These explanations are themselves based on a subconscious
assumption, whereby that which has no links to science and laws of
nature is, by its very nature, absolutely superior to science and
the products of its application.
It is not known whether any of those devices ever actually
levitated. True, J. Searl did claim that he produced one such very
large device, but was unable to present it to the public because
it "escaped into space", and he did not possess the necessary funds
to build another one. And so it was that, due to his bad luck,
mankind was deprived of one valuable testimony.
But here are few encouraging and comforting words.
NASA has for some time been spending significant sums on experiments
with the device invented by E. Podkletnov...!!!???
The last, and the best news…. US Patent Office, at Nov 1. 2005.
granted patent to Boris Wolfson – nevertheless than patent for
invention which is in the same time the perpetualmotion machine and
antigravity device!!!???
!!!!!!?????
Nobody expected this big or unsolvable scientific and technological
problem will be solved by some Patent Office.

Levitation – paradox of all paradoxes!
I have already said that it is a generally accepted opinion whereby
everything corporeal is also heavy, and that it inevitably falls – a
rule which, by some inner logic of things themselves, applies to the
entire material universe.Let us see if that is indeed so.
Astronauts and their space ships, for instance, levitate in relation
to the Earth. The Moon also levitates in relation to the Earth. The
Earth levitates in relation to the Sun. The Sun levitates in
relation to other stars and the centre of the galaxy. Atoms levitate
in relation to one another, electrons levitate in relation to atomic
nucleii, nucleons are levitating in relation to one another, and so
it goes on, ad infinitum.

The entire universe levitates within itself.
The state of levitation, and not of weight and falling, should be
our true experience founded on science. Our actual experience – one
of weight and falling – has been acquired within a very narrow belt
of the Universe where, through a chance combination of specific
circumstances, things are heavy, and they do fall. This,
fundamentally incomplete experience of ours, we have generalized and
applied to the entire Universe. And that was the fatal mistake,
since the Universe is actually weightless; indeed, if it were not
levitating within itself it could not survive.
And so, people have for centuries been unsuccessfully searching for
at least one reliable, unquestionable case of levitation, failing to
notice that it is going on all around them all the time!!!???
Now, is that not a paradox of all paradoxes?

Gravifugal force
However, this all-pervading levitation is not based on anti-
gravitation but on gravifugal force. Gravifugal force is a reaction
to the effect of the gravipetal force, and graviipetal force is in
fact gravitation acting as a centripetal force. According to the law
of action and reaction, gravifugal force acts in a direction
opposite to that of gravipetal force, i.e. of gravitation – and
consequently, it annuls it.
Astronauts orbiting the Earth at a speed of c. 7.9 km/sec, levitate
because they develop a gravifugal force which is equal to gravipetal
force (gravitation). (Those who some like to refer to as "ordinary
folk" think that astronauts levitate because "up there" there is no
gravitation). Geo-stationary satellites also levitate above a
certain point on the Equator due to the gravifugal force generated
by their orbiting around the Earth at a velocity of c. 3.05 km/sec.
(The angular velocity of their orbit equals to that of the Earth).
The velocity of Moon's orbit around the Earth is only 1.002 km/sec.,
but the gravifugal force it develops is sufficient to neutralize
Earth's gravitation, enabling it to levitate. The Earth levitates in
relation to the Sun also on the basis of the gravifugal force
resulting from its orbiting the Sun at a velocity of 30 km/sec.,
etc. etc.
The entire Universe describes some kind of orbiting motion, and its
levitation is based on the balance of gravifugal and gravipetal
forces. If gravipetal force were to become dominant, the Universe
would cave in upon itself, while the dominance of the gravifugal
force would result in its break-up and dispersal – like a discus
revolving too fast.
But lets us take a look at something else, something that is of
practical importance to man.

Theoretical foundation for a gravifugal flying craft
The velocity of Earth's rotation at the equator is 464 m/sec. This
develops a gravifugal acceleration of 0.034 m/sec.2, and
consequently objects lose 0.34 % of their weight. At a geographic
latitude of 45o, where Earth's velocity is 338 m/sec., gravifugal
force is also smaller, and therefore objects lose 0.17% of their
weight. At latitude of 70o, where Earth's velocity is still smaller,
objects lose only 0.035% of their weight. At the poles the linear
velocity of the Earth is zero, and consequently, the gravifugal
force also equals zero. There, objects do not lose any of their
weight. I have mentioned the above values only because they have
been confirmed through numerous measurements. There, the fact of
crucial importance is that objects also lose weight when outside the
rotational plane, which means that gravifugal force also acts
outside the rotational plane.
This fact is important because it demonstrates that it is indeed
possible to build a gravifugal flying craft.
It can be assumed that each parallel on Earth is in fact a solid
ring whose velocity we can alter. With a change in velocity, v, the
value of gravifugal force, Fgf =mv2/R, will also change. But let us
assume that at the North Pole we have only one massive, strong ring
10 m in radius, whose rotational axis was, e.g., coaxial with
Earth's axis. If we were to accelerate that ring to a velocity of
7.9 km/sec. it would lose its entire weight, and it would levitate.
However, such a ring would not levitate only at the poles, but
anywhere on Earth – providing it was rotating at a velocity of 7.9
km/sec. And if we could give it higher velocity, it could carry a
casing and some load. Theoretical and experimental proof for this
can be found on the Internet page:
http://www.geocities.com/agravity/ANTIGRAVITY.htm

Gravifugal flying craft
That would therefore be a solution for some future "anti-
gravitational", i.e. gravifugal, flying craft. Up until now it has
not been possible to build such a craft for these two reasons: 1.
due to the misconception that gravifugal force is only a derivative
of geocentrifugal force, the value of which should always
(regardless of velocity) be equal to zero, and 2. because until the
discovery of nano-tubes no such material existed which would
withstand the velocities necessary to make elevation and levitation
possible.
In the not too distant future, when and if nano-tubes become
affordable, it will be possible to build a commercial flying craft
with two types of ring: mechanical and quantum-rings. The propulsion
energy used to accelerate and elevate the ring will be electricity;
electric batteries will discharge and electric energy would be
transformed into the kinetic energy of the ring. In order to land
the craft the ring will have to decelerate and its kinetic energy
will return to electric energy, which will be stored in batteries.
One flying craft will be able to lift off at least ten times a day
into orbit, and return, at negligible cost. Transport costs of a
visit to certain celestial bodies – the Moon or the planets – would
not be any greater.
Bearing in mind that a gravifugal flying craft would not be
expensive, and would be easily manageable, it is highly likely that
in the not too distant a future, thousands of families would be able
to take to their crafts each weekend and go sightseeing on the Moon.
Given below is the fig. which present a quantum-ring flying craft,
or link: http://www.geocities.com/agravity/ANTIGRAVITY.htm
  to the article and fig.11. within.


How does it function?
Electric energy from battery 9. is, through light source 3.,
transformed into light 2. and inserted into toroidal tube 1, with
mirror-smooth walls. Light reflects from those walls and circles
around the toroidal tube without the possibility "of being
extinguished", i.e. to disappear. Once a sufficient quantity of
light has been inserted into the tube the craft begins to elevate.
To land the craft it is necessary to insert transparent photo-
electric elements 4. into tube 1. Light passes through them, is
transformed back to electric energy and once again stored in
batteries.
The theoretical basis for a flying craft with a quantum-ring, as
well as its experimental confirmation, was provided by Lord Edington
during his investigation of some of the tenets contained in
Einstein's General Theory of Relativity. The passage of sunlight
during an eclipse) has shown a deviation from the direction of
movement, but it also demonstrated that light possesses a certain
degree of inertia. It is this very inertia which enables the quantum-
ring in a gravitational field to behave just like a mechanical ring,
i.e. to develop a gravifugal force which, in fact, is nothing other
than a manifestation of inertia.

Gravifugal civilization
But here is another, ostensibly fantastic aspect:
Readers who are familiar with the way the law of sustainability of
energy functions will understand that a gravifugal flying craft
would be performing no physical activity if it were levitating at a
constant altitude of, for instance, 2, 3, or 4 km, or any other. And
if it were not performing any physical activity (similar to a geo-
stationary satellite), it would not be using energy. A well-built
craft with rings which would also be powerful and permanent magnets,
enclosed within an evacuated casing, would therefore levitate at a
certain height for thousands of years without using any, or almost
any, energy. Such a craft would be suitable for living, and many of
them together for the formation of a levitating town or island. I do
believe that the entire civilization of the future will levitate in
Earth's atmosphere and in the universe surrounding it, and that that
is going to be a mature form of material civilization of mankind.
Just as some parts of the universe are levitating in relation to
other parts, so should – it seems – mature, fully developed material
civilization be levitating in relation to Earth. After all, we have
seen that levitation is the true, real way of survival of the
material universe, and there would be nothing strange in it if that
were the true manner of survival of material civilization.
As far as man is concerned, life in such a civilization would be
much more convenient, healthier and safer than on the humid and
muddy surface of our planet, which provides ideal conditions for
viruses, bacteria, insects and other forms of living creatures, but
not for a creative form like mankind. Speaking from a subjective,
human outlook, Earth is a very beautiful and generous planet. But we
shall be able to fully experience this beauty and generosity only
when we are enjoying them from the safety and comfort of our
gravifugal homes which will, like clouds, be ferried by air currents
all around the Earth.

Sorry Robert:
Antigravity is not only poosible, the system was
already invented in 1967 and patented many years
later.
It is a Monopole High Voltage Generator.
Changing a large 2-terminal capacitor (after it
is charged up to a high potential) into a small
1-terminal capacitor and resulting in a
super-high pulse of one polarity.
Of course the physics books have been nixing it
since they were printed after 1850 but that is
allright.
The problem written in the physics books,
probably by Faraday:
Two concentric metal spheres do not touch and
form a capacitor C.
This one is charged up to a potential V.
Then the outside sphere is removed. The remaining
sphere is a 1-terminal capacitor c. The potential
on this sphere is momentarily: C/c X V. Of course
the books stated that it was just about
impossible to do in practice, it was just a
theoretical problem.
Example: If C had a value of 10 microfarad and
was charged up to a potential of 10,000 volts
(1/10 Coulomb) and then was changed into a
capacitor c of 100 pF, the resulting momentarily
voltage would be 1000 million volts.
That type of capacitor was invented, not just by
me but also by Tesla, who used in his electric
car. He refused to tell anyone how it worked, as
he realized that it could also be used to give
every home on earth free electric power.
I went only to 500,000 volts and had lightning
coming out of the clear blue sky - yes, it scared
the daylights out of me.
This device is inside these big metal spheres of
a Flying Saucer,
where it is used for levitation and propulsion,
and free power.
Of course the so-called "scientists of name"
ridiculed it up to four months after the patent
was granted, but that is normal.
You cannot have brains and a very well over-paid
job at the same time.
Hang in there. In the mean time go to the
Keelynet and type  > One Terminal Capacitor<
  Yes, I wrote to Nasa many times. If you wonder
why Nasa is not interested: All the Jet- and
Rocket Propulsion engineers would be out of a job
and that would be mean! Who needs a spacecraft
that reaches the Moon in a few hours and Mars in
a day or so, without heat-tiles, barfbags and
osteoporosis? Nobody!
Of course I suspect that they tried the invention
a few years ago in Cleveland and caused the Big
Blackout, blaming a poor tree.
They did not know, like I found out, that you
have to use a few
precautions, but that is all right, money is no
object.
Anything that does not have the slightest chance
of ever becoming a reality can get funds, as long
as you do not touch the jet- and
rocket-engineers. Do not kill the goose that lays
golden eggs!
Regards, Joseph H
--- Robert <agravity@...> wrote:

>
> Professor Petar Bosnic Petrus
> Langova 35, 10430 Samobor,
> Croatia
> You are free to reduce and transform this
> article into the form
> suitable to publishing the in your magazine.
> PARADOXES OF GRAVITY AND ANTIGRAVITY
> AND GRAVIFUGAL REVOLUTION
> (Problems related to what is known as
> antigravitation)
>
> Basis for discussion and polemics.
> Is it possible to produce // create the
> antigravitational force, to
> levitate, or to rid oneself of  the effects of
> gravitation?
> This is a question that has plagued the
> non-scientific and, to a
> degree, the scientific world for centuries.
> Presented here are a few
> brief views of the issue which have become
> crystallized during the
> course of my research of this, mostly
> non-scientific, sphere of
> human interest.
>
> What is antigravitation?
> Expressed in the simplest of terms, it should
> be some kind of force
> which would oppose gravitation, annul it and
> make possible the
> levitation of bodies.
> For physicists, antigravitation is a nonsense,
> since no such mass
> exists which could repel another mass, prevent
> the spread of
> gravitation or, like Verne's Cavorite, isolate
> a body from its
> influence. According to understanding available
> to date, this cannot
> be achieved – either by way of anti-matter or
> by some field.
>
> snip

See at:
http://www.americanantigravity.com/
very interesting!

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

Antigravity and levitation
Real and apparent levitation

Levitation is always levitating, or floating in
relation to something, or in regard to something - in
regard to magnet, or body with electrostatic charge;
in regard to surface of Earth or some other celestial
body.

We need to different real and apparent levitation.
Real levitation is in fact weightless state.- state in
which body lose or have lost its weight. All cases of
levitation in which the body retain entire its weight
are cases of apparent levitation.

Those, apparent cases of levitation are: magnetic and
diamagnetic, electrostatic, aerodynamic etc.etc. It is
achieved by acting of reppelant force between magnetic
poles or electrostatic charges, or some other way.
Apparent levitation is very usefull and is used in
many ways in contemporary technology: magnet bearings,
maglev trains, helicopters, hovercrafts etc.etc. But
this kind of levitation is functional and efficacious
only at a small distances.

Real levitation, is in fact weightless state. It was
achieved by circular, i.e. orbital movement in Earths
gravitational field. Eg. Levitation of astronauts in
their spaceships. In that kind of movement, gravity
functions as a centripetal force – force curving the
trajectory of the moving body into circular shape.
Mass of the body react, i.e. resist to the changing of
its line of motion. Consequence of that resistance,
i.e. inertia of the mass of body – at the velocity
7,9km /sec.- is weightless state – real levitation.
Inertia of body mass manifests itself as a centrifugal
force. Centrifugal force is a reaction to the
centrifugal force action (Newton, 3).

Weightless state, i.e. real levitation is, however a
consequence of equality of centripetal and centrifugal
force During that levitation, bodies are losing only
its weight, but not its mass neither inertia. This
kind of levitation is functional and efficacious also
at a very large distances.

Permanent real levitation is needed to maintain
satelites in its orbit, but it is wery bad for human
health.

Equation to find the velocity of levitation, vl is as
follow:
vl = square GM/R ,
where The G is gravitational constant, M is mass of
Earth and R is a radius, i.e. distance of satelite
from the center of gravity of Earth.

In a lowest orbits it is cca 7,9km/sec. In a higher
orbits, this velocity is lesser.
Geostationary satelites are levitating above the
certain point at the equator orbiting the Earth by
velocity cca 3,05km/sec. Its angular velocity is equal
to that of Earth.
Moon is levitating in relation to Earth on a base of
velocity of 1,002km/sec.
Earth is levitating in regard to Sun on a base of the
velocity of 30km/sec.,arround Sun.

Gravifugal levitation. In all cases in which gravity
functions as a centripetal force, instead of terms
centripetal and centrifugal, it is better to use terms
gravipetal and gravifugal. Gravifugal force is
reaction to the gravipetal force action. It is real
levitation.
Speaking in theese terms, real levitation is a
consequence of equality and cancelling out of
gravifugal and gravipetal force.


Electrofugal levitation is also real levitation.
Electron orbiting atom nuclei is in a weightless state
in regard to that nuclei – in a state of levitation.

We also can speak about magnetofugal and nucleofugal
levitation.Those are also a kinds of real levitation.

Antigravitational levitation – yet not found - just a
wish. On a base of contemporary physics is not
possible to understand internal structure or real base
of this wish. It is not possible to understand or
imagine how to create antigravitational force, field,
or so called shield.

Meditative and paranormal levitation – also only wish,
up today. See Gravifugal levitation

Human needs to leave the surface of Earth, to wisit
other celestial bodies and to live in the space is
possible to realize by using gravifugal force and
gravifugal levitation. In other papers I have shown
that it is possible to use this kind of levitation in
a quite different and muhc more economic manner than
this that was used in astronautical practice up now.
See:
http://www.geocities.com/agravity/ANTIGRAVITY.htm





________________________________________________________________________________\
____
Sponsored Link

Degrees online in as fast as 1 Yr
MBA, Bachelor's, Master's, Assoc
http://yahoo.degrees.info

Antigravity and gravifugal levitation
Real and apparent levitation

Improved article

This is not some new theory, than rather simple, clear
and correct description of physical reality,
description based in existing science.

Levitation - always is levitating, or floating in
relation to something, or in regard to something - in
regard to magnet, or body with electrostatic charge;
in regard to surface of Earth or some other celestial
body.

We need to different real and apparent levitation.
Real levitation is in fact weightless state.- state in
which body lose or have lost its weight. All cases of
levitation in which the body retain entire its weight
are cases of apparent levitation.

Those, apparent cases of levitation are: magnetic and
diamagnetic, electrostatic, aerodynamic etc.etc. It is
achieved by acting of reppelant force between magnetic
poles or electrostatic charges, or some other way.
Apparent levitation is very usefull and is used in
many ways in contemporary technology: magnet bearings,
maglev trains, hovercrafts etc.etc. But this kind of
levitation is functional and efficacious only at a
small distances – from several milimeters to several
centimeters or decimeters.

Real levitation - as just was stated - is in fact
weightless state. It was achieved by circular, i.e.
orbital movement in Earths gravitational field. Eg.
Levitation of astronauts in their spaceships. In
mentioned kind of movement, gravity functions as an
atracting, centripetal force – force curving the
trajectory of the moving bodies (eg. Satelites) into
circular shape (arround the celestial body). Mass of
the body react, i.e. resist to the changing of its
line of motion. Consequence of that resistance, i.e.
inertia of the mass of body – at the velocity 7,9km
/sec.- is weightless state – real levitation. Inertia
of body mass manifests itself as a centrifugal force.
Centrifugal force is a reaction to the centripetal
force action (Newton, 3).

Weightless state, i.e. real levitation is, however a
consequence of equality of centripetal and centrifugal
force During that levitation, bodies are losing only
its weight, but not its mass neither inertia. This
kind of levitation is functional and efficacious also
at a very large distances.

Permanent real levitation is needed to maintain
satelites in its orbit, but it is wery bad for human
health.

Equation serves to find the velocity of levitation, vl
is as follow:
vl = square GM/R ,
where The G is gravitational constant, M is mass of
Earth and R is a radius, i.e. distance of satelite
from the center of gravity of Earth.

Velocity of levitation is in fact the velocity of
satelisation.

In a lowest orbits it is cca 7,9km/sec. In a higher
orbits, this velocity is lesser.
Geostationary satelites are levitating above the
certain point at the equator orbiting the Earth by
velocity cca 3,05km/sec. Its angular velocity is equal
to that of Earth.
Moon is levitating in relation to Earth on a base of
velocity of 1,002km/sec.
Earth is levitating in regard to Sun on a base of the
velocity of 30km/sec., arround Sun.

In all previous cases of levitation, in which gravity
functions as a centripetal force, instead of terms
centripetal and centrifugal, it is better to use terms
gravipetal and gravifugal. Gravifugal force is a
reaction to the gravipetal force action. Eg.
weightless state of astronauts, is a case of
gravifugal levitation, as well as levitation of the
Earth in regard to Sun and others.
Speaking in theese terms, gravifugal levitation, which
is a kind of real levitation, is a consequence of
equality and cancelling out of gravifugal and
gravipetal force.
See Gravifugal levitation

Electrofugal levitation is also real levitation.
Electron orbiting atom nuclei is in a weightless state
in regard to that nuclei – in a state of levitation.
Weightless state of electron is based in eqality and
canceling out the electropetal and electrofugal force.

We also can speak about magnetofugal and nucleofugal
levitation.Those are also a kinds of real levitation.

Using the new terminology, we are able to different
various kinds of levitation: gravifugal, magnetic,
magnetofugal, electrostatic, electrofugal etc etc.
Furthermore, we are able to different exactly,
scientifically real and apparent levitation and also
define it.

Real levitation we can achieve by oposing the inertia
of body to some (fundamental) atracting centripetal
force (gravipetal, electropetal ...etc.). We are
opposing it by circular motion and certain velocity
arround the point of application of attracting
(centripetal) force.

Important note. Only by opposing a body inertia to the
gravity attracting force, we are preventing, or
stopping the gravitational acceleration of body and so
the body arrives to weightless state, i.e. becomes to
levitate. Accelerating, i.e. free falling down body
has no weight. If we, however, prevent gravitational
acceleration of that body by some other body or solid
Earths surface, or, indeed, by magnetic or
electrostatic field, the body becomes to be weighty or
weightfull – even it, eg. float, or levitate above
some magnet or electrostatic charge.

Here are forces able to function as a centripetal
force:
Gravity – gravipetal – gravifugal - levitation in
regard to celestial body
Electricity - electropetal – electrofugal – levitation
in regard to atom nuclei
Nuclear f. - nucleopetal – nucleofugal.-   in regard
to nucleon or atom nuclei
Magnetism – magnetopetal – magnetofugal   in regard to
one magnetic pole.
Solidity – solidopetal – solidofugal – here is no
levitation.

Solidity is declared as an apparent force or
pseudoforce. Solidofugal force can cause only
mechanical stress in the matter of the rotating solid
body.

Antigravitational levitation – yet not found – up
today exist just as wish. On a base of contemporary
physics is not possible to understand internal
structure or real base of this wish. Also it is not
possible to understand or imagine how to create
antigravitational force, field, or so called shield.

Meditative, volitive and paranormal levitation – also
seems to be only wish, up today.

Human needs to leave the surface of Earth, to wisit
other celestial bodies and to live in the space is
possible to realize by using gravifugal force and
gravifugal levitation. In other papers I have shown
that it is possible to use this kind of levitation and
gravifugal force in a quite different and muhc more
economic manner than is this that was used in
astronautical practice up now. See: gravifugal flying
craft
http://www.geocities.com/agravity/ANTIGRAVITY.htm



________________________________________________________________________________\
____
Sponsored Link

$420k for $1,399/mo.
Think You Pay Too Much For Your Mortgage?
Find Out! www.LowerMyBills.com/lre

Petar Bosnic Petrus

Paradoxically, by a help of Einstein`s Special
Relativity, I finally have discovered eficcacious and
simple supraluminal particle accelerators, as  I
firmly believe. Since it is, up now, forbiden to copy
this article, I am sending you just a link,where you
can find it, if you have some interest in it.

http://www.petar-bosnic-petrus.com/work/conical-and-paraboloidal-supraluminal-pa\
rticle-accelerators/

Thank you

Petar Bosnic Petrus



________________________________________________________________________________\
____Got a little couch potato?
Check out fun summer activities for kids.
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=summer+activities+for+kids&cs=bz