Carl Tilley Interview

Where do you see your company 5 years from now?

 Hopefully in the next five years we will be in the position to help other inventors with projects and be known as the leader in the area of Research and Development. Other projects will be building apartment units for the handicapped, grants to encourage science studies in public schools and extensive support of new inventors and the pit falls of research and development.

 What happened with your last company in Wyoming?

 We did very good for the first year. We then had two large jobs we never were paid for and it simply broke us. We could never recover from the huge problem. One of them wrote a bad check and of course prior to finding out their check was bad and checks started bouncing. We filed for bankruptcy and continued on  for about another year in the area.

 What do you see as your major hurdles?

 It become obvious that proving it to the world is not easy. One needs to first prove it to themselves then to a person that can purchase the technology. Test validation is needed...but each test brings on someone else that said the first tester did not do something or they were paid by us ...it never ends...that is why you must prove it to the buyer and let them bring in their own team of technicians. The other area is public relations...we now have a PR issue and it will be overcome in time once all the court issues are settled and the truth is reviled. One must understand that almost all inventors are called con artist frauds and that they are nuts .... the list is never ending and in the research and development area you must be prepared for this.

 Which market do you feel is most important to target:?

 That is hard to say...I get many e-mail request each day concerning the home power unit and an equal amount for the boat, ATV and the car. Currently there seems to be more interest in the home device.

 Why do you think Sterling turned on you and what is your response to his pages?

 Sterling used information from our web page and got response at first. He became upset several times when we refused to give this to the world free and especially post it on his page. He was getting less and less hits on his page and when two people showed up with what he considered dirty information he used it. It is one thing to say something concerning others but to make stuff up is out of line. He got caught between a rock and a hard place.... he could not go back and say he was wrong and decided he would proceed forward on statements made by others. My response to his page...I consider him being what he is...he uses religion to clear his way for anything he could say wrong...overall I pay very little attention to Sterling and his web site....my response will come sooner or later to Sterling...I fight one war at a time.

Are there any other motor-generator OU claims that have any merit?

 I have not looked very much at other inventors or OU claims.  I am sure they all have some very positive advancements. I am glad to see the area of alternative energy on the up-side for the public. I would never say that would not work or it is a bad idea...good ideas come from research and development...there are many failed attempts before they become accepted...the light bulb is a good example.

Will you attempt any other public demonstrations of the scope of the Nashville demo?

 We expect to do a long run this summer on the car. Boat test are set and so is the additional test of the ATV by an outside company wishing to purchase it.  We are also working with a contractor that is willing to build a house in a very remote location that is far from the grid and totally power it with the device.

 What do you feel that TV report on you got wrong?

 First they lied when they told not only me, but the public, they were doing a story to prove the invention to public satisfaction. The came up telling me they were doing a story on the electric boat at first...then it was on the car...they lied to get a foot in the door to do a one sided reporting job. They arrived with no technical people to test the devices...the reporter did not even now what a watt or milliamp was. Several statements they made were false and misleading.  there are many issues but overall it was a set up story based on information that others provided...we knew they went to Wyoming ...the day they arrived...we know who they talked to and several of the good comments were never aired...only the bad....some of the tape they did was cut and taken out of context...We filmed them as they filmed us at the interview...we have every word stated on and off the camera. We are doing a video also and pointing out the " taken out of context statements" and we have someone in Wyoming asking about statements made there. As far as the other two people they interviewed I have no comment on them as it will all come in court very soon I hope.