This has been worked to death in other forums and this is simply another claim
without backing. Don't waste time on things that don't work.
--- In free_energy@yahoogroups.com, "scriabini" <scriabini@...> wrote:
>
> The Ainslie switching circuit is incredibly
> simple to construct and replicate.
>
> Why not evaluate the circuit and provide
> us your feedback?
>
> Of course, any who are interested may do
> so as well.  It would be exceedingly interesting
> to compare results amongst all who perform the
> experiment against what Gary discovers.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---  "garys_2k"  wrote:
> >
> > They claim overunity but NEVER measure (not even improperly, very easy to do
with a rig like this) the input power.
> >
> > Sorry, not even close to winning the cigar!
> >
>
>
> > ---  Kirk McLoren  wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > http://www.rexresearch.com/ainslie/ainslie.htm
> > >
> >
>

I don't have nearly enough time, or interest.

I just thought it was strange that a claim was made for overunity operation when
no power INPUT measurements were done. Why not call it fifty times overunity? A
hundred?

--- In free_energy@yahoogroups.com, "scriabini" <scriabini@...> wrote:
>
> The Ainslie switching circuit is incredibly
> simple to construct and replicate.
>
> Why not evaluate the circuit and provide
> us your feedback?
>
> Of course, any who are interested may do
> so as well.  It would be exceedingly interesting
> to compare results amongst all who perform the
> experiment against what Gary discovers.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---  "garys_2k"  wrote:
> >
> > They claim overunity but NEVER measure (not even improperly, very easy to do
with a rig like this) the input power.
> >
> > Sorry, not even close to winning the cigar!
> >
>
>
> > ---  Kirk McLoren  wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > http://www.rexresearch.com/ainslie/ainslie.htm
> > >
> >
>

Eric,

It is unfortunate that you agreed to perform tests
for Drazin and SafeHHO.  NONE of the faults you
experienced with the Xtreme HHO unit were due to YOUR
'improper maintenance.'  The fault is the the Titanium
MMO coated plates that he is attempting to use for an
application they are not designed to tolerate.

He's using 'Titanium' as a new sales 'buzzword' to
justify his ridiculously high prices for a product
that is prone to early failure.  His recent efforts
to resort to an acidic electrolyte rather than the
formerly basic solution, is a last-ditch attempt to
solve the very short lifetimes of the Titanium-MMO
plates in a process for which they were never designed
to function.

Essentially, his operation is a scam which will exploit
those who are insufficiently knowledgeable.  At a very
high, and technically non-justifiable, cost.

If you want to continue exploring the benefits of
Hydrogen-Oxygen input to your automobile engine with
manufactured units ready for installation, there are
reputable sources.

An excellent source is located here:

http://www.waterfuelforall.com/waterfuel-booster-frame.htm


By the way, we all appreciate greatly your efforts
to get to the Truth while in the process exposing
the scammers.  Well done!





Eric said:


Although I have been known as a skeptic of free energy and high
mileage claims, I currently have a hydrogen boost device
installed on my car - the following link is a summary of my
testing done on this device:

http://www.phact. org/e/safehho. htm
The device is not working now - it appeared to dissolve its self
in a longer test. I gave the inventor multiple chances to get
it working. I was in the process of negotiating giving them
another chance to get it working and posted data to date. This
got the company owner very angry at me - he says my improper
maintenance caused it to not work or be destroyed and has
threatened a lawsuit if I don't take down the page. I don't
think I want to help any more hydrogen boost people do tests.
Skeptics say some of my high mileage seen on some short tests
were a result of poor protocol on my part.

Eric Krieg

Yep, sort of the "free range" energy. Tastier that way, too.

--- In free_energy@yahoogroups.com, GEB email <geb353@...> wrote:
>
> 'Free energy' cannot, by definition, be harnessed.
> It must be 'free', to roam as it pleases.....
> heh heh
>
> ---cheers!!!
> BuddyRay
> from The Mostly Elevated MasterBlaster @ DULCET~TONE~SERVICE & REPAIRS
> My guitar/amp service shop http://dtservice.home.insightbb.com/
> HOME OF BUDDYRAY'S CHILI  'Hot enough to start a car.'
>
> Try out the new zombocom: http://zombo.com/
>

The Ainslie switching circuit is incredibly
simple to construct and replicate.

Why not evaluate the circuit and provide
us your feedback?

Of course, any who are interested may do
so as well.  It would be exceedingly interesting
to compare results amongst all who perform the
experiment against what Gary discovers.







---  "garys_2k"  wrote:
>
> They claim overunity but NEVER measure (not even improperly, very easy to do
with a rig like this) the input power.
>
> Sorry, not even close to winning the cigar!
>


> ---  Kirk McLoren  wrote:
> >
> >
> > http://www.rexresearch.com/ainslie/ainslie.htm
> >
>

You can find informations from possible solution of space travelling.
Informations are videos and explanation:

Most important videos from these thrusters:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0nGiEGUErY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KMeGJ6t6rE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIu51H7zsNY

Full complett:
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=borbasmiklos

Solution is presented in the first drawing on my links:

http://thruster.groupkos.com/unipolar.html
http://www.fw.hu/bmiklos2000/unipolar.html

They claim overunity but NEVER measure (not even improperly, very easy to do
with a rig like this) the input power.

Sorry, not even close to winning the cigar!

--- In free_energy@yahoogroups.com, Kirk McLoren <kirkmcloren@...> wrote:
>
>
> http://www.rexresearch.com/ainslie/ainslie.htm
>

Everything in motion is supported by the conservation of energy. But things in
perpetual motion is not the same as a perpetual motion machine.
To harvest energy to do work there must be an energy gradient.

--- In free_energy@yahoogroups.com, "Mr. J" <jaemsjohn@...> wrote:
>
> Well since everything is moving this is a moot argument.
>
> Harnassing the energy effortlessly is the real question.
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: waynegage2000 <waynegage@...>
> To: free_energy@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Mon, November 9, 2009 5:16:21 AM
> Subject: [free_energy] Re: It's too quiet!
>
>
> Free energy as in perpetual motion is not possible so no one is threatened by
this.
>
> --- In free_energy@ yahoogroups. com, "John" <spacetrooper50@ ...> wrote:
> >
> > Free energy tend to threaten some group of people around this planet. I thik
since there are allot of strong opposition to what the people here is trying to
"do", we should do a head count on the member of this group. Some sort of
inventory just to make sure everyone made it trough the hunting season dont you
think?
> >
> > John,
> >
>

Free energy as in perpetual motion is not possible so no one is threatened by
this.

--- In free_energy@yahoogroups.com, "John" <spacetrooper50@...> wrote:
>
> Free energy tend to threaten some group of people around this planet. I thik
since there are allot of strong opposition to what the people here is trying to
"do", we should do a head count on the member of this group. Some sort of
inventory just to make sure everyone made it trough the hunting season dont you
think?
>
> John,
>

You cannot name a single unconventional power source that works.
Those who bring us energy do a good job. If not for them you would be building a
fire daily to cook your food.

--- In free_energy@yahoogroups.com, "Wm. Scott Smith" <scott712@...> wrote:
>
>
> Perpetual Motion is a straw-man argument that is used to slander every
unconventional power source; nonetheless, all energy is free until someone takes
it away from the rest of us, seizes control of it and maintains artificially
high prices by means of contrived shortages.  In what sense do we repay nature
for any of the energy we take, except in the form of paying our debt to entropy?
>
>

Free energy tend to threaten some group of people around this planet. I thik
since there are allot of strong opposition to what the people here is trying to
"do", we should do a head count on the member of this group. Some sort of
inventory just to make sure everyone made it trough the hunting season dont you
think?

John,

thats different...

http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/49288/title/Signature_of_antimatter_d\
etected_in_lightning

Cliff,

We love windmills and there's no denying it - they definitely have a certain
appeal. They creaked noisily around in their charmingly inefficient way and did
an amazing thing.  They harnessed the power of the wind to facilitate activities
like the baking of bread.

Modern wind turbines are beautiful things. Within their graceful structures they
prove to be masterworks of form and function.  They whirl with a phenomenal
level of efficiency so as to prevent us from frying the planet. And the great
news is that the wind cannot be over farmed.  What's not to like?

At the end of the day we can note that all of our most notable sources of energy
are generated via the heavens and the earth. The nuclear fusion of small atom
allows energy to shine down on our planet, the nuclear fission of large atoms
continues to allow heat to rise up from below while gravitational attraction
between the moon and the Earth allows both objects to continue to spin around in
their merry way. There's just one problem. Nuclear fuels are a finite resource
and this begs the question as to what will happen when this fuel is gone. How
might future generations regard our generation once we've completed not only the
glazing of the atmosphere but also the stripping of the most valuable resources
that our planet has to offer.

The word atmosphere means sphere of water.  Perhaps the description is apt.  A
heated atmosphere may, depending on the weather, hold more water than a cold
atmosphere.  A heated earth could, onoccasion, turn into a form of steam room
while, on later occasions, it would become a shower.  Floods may be devastating
.  Winds may be high.  Future generations may want to build wind turbines but
they may have difficulties in ensuring their survival.

It is possible that future generations will look back at our "modern" wind
turbines and view them amongst the most beautiful things that man has ever
produced. We look back on old styled windmills with nostalgia as we give respect
to the great efforts that our ancestors made just to feed themselves. Future
generations will look at our wind turbines with nostalgia knowing that the
turbines were built to help secure their future.

Wind turbines need to be built but, more than that, they need to be successfully
integrated into the power networks of our planet.  The problem with wind
turbines is that they only work when the wind blows. So what can we do?  The
best option would be to institute a tiered pricing structure for electricity and
pass any necessary legislation so that our very high powered industries might
only operate at times when green energy is available.  If we had
cheaperelectricity on windy days then these would be the days on which people
would stay in to do the washing and to use their power tools.  We could also
have an industry that was based on a greener form of revolution.

more at Attempts at Survival
http://www.attempts.org.uk
http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/group.php?gid=149310585856

made a folder labeled Vert and I think I got the stuff in there

enjoy!

You can find informations from possible space travelling. Informations are
videos and explanation:

Most important videos from these thrusters:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0nGiEGUErY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KMeGJ6t6rE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIu51H7zsNY

Full complett:
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=borbasmiklos

Solution is presented in the first drawing on my links:

http://thruster.groupkos.com/unipolar.html
http://www.fw.hu/bmiklos2000/unipolar.html