Tina,

You're absolutely right!  I switched (all but the firm name -- gotta
play with that) to sans serif and it's cleaner/more readable.  Yes,
lots more work is needed but this definitely is an improvement in
terms of presentation and functionality.  Geneva is not loaded onto
my laptop right now, but then I don't have a printer loaded.  I'll
download my HP printer onto the laptop and see if I can pick up more
fonts that way.  Thanks a million.  BTW:  no, no logo yet and, yes,
it's sure hard to brand without one -- which is why I'm hanging onto
that darn serif in the letterhead/business cards.  oy ;-)

THANK YOU.

Leslie

--- In frontpage@y..., "Tina Clarke" <tina@c...> wrote:
> > Thanks for all the tips Tina!  The serif font has to do
> with the
> > nature of the business and the popularity of
> > branding/having 'everything' look the same:  business
> cards, brochure
> > covers, letterhead . . . website.
>
> This is something your going to run into.. many people dont'
> realise that you can't have the website looking like the
> rest of it.. I find the site hard to read particulary the
> disclaimer.. If was looking for this type of site myself..
> I'd pass them by and look elsewhere.. if they can't get the
> first page right .. maybe their business practice is no good
> either... your the designer you tell them what's good
> design.. that's what they are paying you for.
>
>
> They're serif-oriented people so I
> > gave them serifs.  My first test layout was in Lucida sans
> . . .
>
> I would use three sans serif fonts.. to cover most
> browsers.. like Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans serif
>
> the online research tools I would take away online .. we
> know it's online otherwise we would not see it.. so that is
> redundant.. it would make the text fit the button better as
> well...
>
> > maybe I'll keep the company name in serif and stray over
> to sans
> > serif for body text but I'm trying to avoid getting too
> busy.
>
> I would make the company name more interesting.. don't they
> have a logo? That would spruce it up a little.. just give it
> that little bit extra.. as it is..it's quite bland.. but the
> background and buttons look good.. just some little tweaks
> and it would grab me (just my opinion)
>
>  Use no
> > more than 3 typefaces on a page was what I heard in a
> powerpoint
> > presentations course, but even that can get to be too
> much, esp. if
> > I'm flipping between serif and sans.  Hmmmmmmm.  Thanks
> and thanks
> > for all the feedback and links.  I know the site is very
> basic and
> > bare . . . but it won't stay that way for long.  My first
> step may be
> > to get myself off AOL though :-)
>
> If you degrade the fonts.. but use the same coding throught
> the web you won't go wrong.. any other fonts should be in a
> graphic.. Myself I don't like different fonts on a site..
> and heading and titles and links should be uniform same as
> backgrounds placement of buttons .. buttons themselves.. ..
>
> hth Tina
>
> AccessFP - FrontPage Resource Centre
> Site -  http://www.accessfp.net/
> Journal - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AccessFPJournal
> Forums - http://anyfrontpage.com/
> Ezine -  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AnyFrontPageBytes
> Tina's FrontPage News
> http://www.personal-computer-tutor.com/ABC.htm

> You're absolutely right!  I switched (all but the firm
name -- gotta
> play with that) to sans serif and it's cleaner/more
readable.  Yes,
> lots more work is needed but this definitely is an
improvement in
> terms of presentation and functionality.  Geneva is not
loaded onto
> my laptop right now, but then I don't have a printer
loaded.  I'll
> download my HP printer onto the laptop and see if I can
pick up more
> fonts that way.  Thanks a million.  BTW:  no, no logo yet
and, yes,
> it's sure hard to brand without one -- which is why I'm
hanging onto
> that darn serif in the letterhead/business cards.  oy ;-)
>
> THANK YOU.
>
> Leslie

Your welcome... I was just on my soapbox again ... sorry:)

Tina

Just went for a look... it does look much easier to read and
the button too... the only thing I would now is to put a
link to a bigger disclaimer page and a privacy policy..
truste.com can help with that.. don't forget to look up
sites concerning the sites subject in the area it resides
in.. and see what they have for disclaimers pp etc.. this is
a good way to catch things one misses that are relevant and
necessary to the area the site has the business in...

next thing is your meta tags... see
http://solution-shelf.com and the free fp add-on they have
for that.. plus lots of help on meta tags... and what to
put.. I believe the pics tag is also needed now....

hth Tina

AccessFP - FrontPage Resource Centre
Site -  http://www.accessfp.net/
Journal - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AccessFPJournal
Forums - http://anyfrontpage.com/
Ezine -  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AnyFrontPageBytes
Tina's FrontPage News
http://www.personal-computer-tutor.com/ABC.htm

I'm need to place a movie on my site. We have a short VHS promo video. I
have someone to convert it to digital, but I'm not sure what is the best
file format, and the best way to give visitors access?

Ideas anyone? Thanks!

Tom K

I'm new to the group and would be grateful for anyhelp.
I upgraded my compter with a new one running xp home, and then
loaded frontpage 2000 on it.  I manage about 10 websites, got three
of them opened and they are like file folders under the Mynetwork
places.  But frontpage won't allow my to add any other web sites to
my network places.  I'm at a loss as what to do.
Chris

the best formats >> .mpeg  , .ram +.rm (but u'll need
real server 4 those two real teacnologies if ur gonna
play them on the server)...but u can put them there 4
downloading only (in this case better ziped)

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/

Maybe there's no way around this...
From within FP, when I open a page that is not on my published web, another
instance of FP opens.  Maybe this is a safety feature, so I'll know that I'm
only working on my drive and not in my web.  Or maybe I have something
configured in error.  Do others of you find this, too?

thanks!

> Maybe there's no way around this...
> From within FP, when I open a page that is not on my
published web, another
> instance of FP opens.  Maybe this is a safety feature, so
I'll know that I'm
> only working on my drive and not in my web.  Or maybe I
have something
> configured in error.  Do others of you find this, too?
>
> thanks

When you say you open the page.. HOW are you doing it?

Clicking a link on your page in preview?

Tina

I'm trying to open a page I have saved on my hard drive under a different
folder...  not connected with my web.  I don't think I'm explaining this
very well..   bear with me.  I have a couple of chores to do around here
(like a shower, for one thing : ) .....  and I'll try to explain this better
a little later.
thanks,


----- Original Message -----
From: "Tina Clarke" <tina@...>
To: <frontpage@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 7:48 AM
Subject: Re: [frontpage] 2 instances of FP open

When you say you open the page.. HOW are you doing it?
Clicking a link on your page in preview?

Tina



  Maybe there's no way around this...
From within FP, when I open a page that is not on my published web, another
instance of FP opens.  Maybe this is a safety feature, so I'll know that I'm
only working on my drive and not in my web.  Or maybe I have something
configured in error.  Do others of you find this, too?
nan

Ah!  Because it's in another folder, not associated with the website you're
currently editing, FP thinks you want to open another web, so it opens
another FP so you can edit it separately.  If it is just a page you want to
bring into your existing website, then you can import or cut and paste into
a new page on your existing website.  FP only opens one website at a
time...I think it'd be too confusing to have 2 open in one, what with how FP
does the navigation, linking, etc.  Makes sense to me.....And, yes, this is
how FP is configured.
	 Hope this helps!
	 - Linda Levy

-----Original Message-----
From: zz [mailto:zzz@...]
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 8:10 AM
To: frontpage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [frontpage] 2 instances of FP open


I'm trying to open a page I have saved on my hard drive under a different
folder...  not connected with my web.  I don't think I'm explaining this
very well..   bear with me.  I have a couple of chores to do around here
(like a shower, for one thing : ) .....  and I'll try to explain this better
a little later.
thanks,


----- Original Message -----
From: "Tina Clarke" <tina@...>
To: <frontpage@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 7:48 AM
Subject: Re: [frontpage] 2 instances of FP open

When you say you open the page.. HOW are you doing it?
Clicking a link on your page in preview?

Tina



  Maybe there's no way around this...
From within FP, when I open a page that is not on my published web, another
instance of FP opens.  Maybe this is a safety feature, so I'll know that I'm
only working on my drive and not in my web.  Or maybe I have something
configured in error.  Do others of you find this, too?
nan





frontpage

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Good...  it made sense to me, but I wasn't sure.  As long as it isn't just
my machine doing something hinky, I'm happy : )

thanks bunches!

----- Original Message -----
From: "Linda Levy/Steve King" <linda@...>
To: <frontpage@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 10:54 AM
Subject: RE: [frontpage] 2 instances of FP open


Ah!  Because it's in another folder, not associated with the website you're
currently editing, FP thinks you want to open another web, so it opens
another FP so you can edit it separately.  If it is just a page you want to
bring into your existing website, then you can import or cut and paste into
a new page on your existing website.  FP only opens one website at a
time...I think it'd be too confusing to have 2 open in one, what with how FP
does the navigation, linking, etc.  Makes sense to me.....And, yes, this is
how FP is configured.
Hope this helps!
- Linda Levy

-----Original Message-----
From: zz [mailto:zzz@...]
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 8:10 AM
To: frontpage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [frontpage] 2 instances of FP open


I'm trying to open a page I have saved on my hard drive under a different
folder...  not connected with my web.  I don't think I'm explaining this
very well..   bear with me.  I have a couple of chores to do around here
(like a shower, for one thing : ) .....  and I'll try to explain this better
a little later.
thanks,


----- Original Message -----
From: "Tina Clarke" <tina@...>
To: <frontpage@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 7:48 AM
Subject: Re: [frontpage] 2 instances of FP open

When you say you open the page.. HOW are you doing it?
Clicking a link on your page in preview?

Tina



  Maybe there's no way around this...
From within FP, when I open a page that is not on my published web, another
instance of FP opens.  Maybe this is a safety feature, so I'll know that I'm
only working on my drive and not in my web.  Or maybe I have something
configured in error.  Do others of you find this, too?
nan





frontpage

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





frontpage

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Hi,

The website I'm putting together is for a law practice and adding
photos is going to give it a lot more dimension. I'm cautious about
downloading photos even if they are in the public domain since the
site is a commercial use site.  Not just that -- public domain photos
seem limited to gavels and law books on a shelf and even though
Microsoft has a good photo of a courthouse, it's one of only two they
offer and maybe a lot of people are using it.  I've contacted a
photographer (whose work is excellent) and received a quote of $750-
$1,100 for a limited license for non-exclusive use of a photo from
his collection both on the web and in any brochure I might spin off.
Is this relatively inline with what pro photos cost?  Eyewire.com has
been recommended as a good source for photos that aren't expensive.
Has anyone gone that route?

Another thing, FP Reports is giving me a hit count which is really
useful in terms of letting me know the browsers used by people who
visit the site (which I haven't even metatagged for search engines
yet ;-) (xxx of some version of ME, 1 only through Netscape) but what
I'm wondering is if anyone has taken this a step further and found a
program that gives the web address for these visitors?  If so, what
are they using?  The clear downside of this would be spamming such
visitors, but collecting information for an unsolicited mailing list
wouldn't be why I'd want this kind of information.  I'm just curious
about who is viewing it.

Thanks in advance to anyone who helps.

Leslie

I use a 56k connection at home to connect to my Tripod server. Everytime I
try to access my website, FP keeps telling me that it has a problem
connecting to the server and gives me a warning about not being able to
find a file called error4044.doc

I have read that this problem might be from my slower connection, but the
thing is, it worked find just last week.

Please help.

~Ethan

Has your connection speed changed?  Before DSL, sometimes I would get
connected at 33k instead of 52k, and I would get that error.  I didn't
realize that plugging more phones/faxes into my dial-up line slowed it
down.  Plug any new phones or faxes in to that line? :)

JohnJohn
______________________

www.BIGoffroad.com
www.LUVMYJP.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ethan.gomberg@...
> [mailto:ethan.gomberg@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 7:01 AM
> To: frontpage@yahoogroups.com; MS-Frontpage2000@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [frontpage] FP server problems
>
>
> I use a 56k connection at home to connect to my Tripod
> server. Everytime I try to access my website, FP keeps
> telling me that it has a problem connecting to the server and
> gives me a warning about not being able to find a file called
> error4044.doc
>
> I have read that this problem might be from my slower
> connection, but the thing is, it worked find just last week.
>
> Please help.
>
> ~Ethan
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ---------------------~--> Tiny Wireless Camera under $80!
> Order Now! FREE VCR Commander! Click Here - Only 1 Day Left!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/WoOlbB/7.PDAA/ySSFAA> /HKFolB/TM
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------~->
>
> frontpage
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>

No I never added anything to the line. Like I said, it was working last
week, and nothing has changed. It seems that my connection is still
somewhere between 50-56k.

What a quandry!

~Ethan




                     "JohnJohn"
                     <bigoffroad@ya       To:     <frontpage@yahoogroups.com>
                     hoo.com>             cc:
                                          Subject:     RE: [frontpage] FP server
problems
                     01/22/2002
                     09:43 AM
                     Please respond
                     to frontpage






Has your connection speed changed?  Before DSL, sometimes I would get
connected at 33k instead of 52k, and I would get that error.  I didn't
realize that plugging more phones/faxes into my dial-up line slowed it
down.  Plug any new phones or faxes in to that line? :)

JohnJohn
______________________

www.BIGoffroad.com
www.LUVMYJP.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ethan.gomberg@...
> [mailto:ethan.gomberg@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 7:01 AM
> To: frontpage@yahoogroups.com; MS-Frontpage2000@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [frontpage] FP server problems
>
>
> I use a 56k connection at home to connect to my Tripod
> server. Everytime I try to access my website, FP keeps
> telling me that it has a problem connecting to the server and
> gives me a warning about not being able to find a file called
> error4044.doc
>
> I have read that this problem might be from my slower
> connection, but the thing is, it worked find just last week.
>
> Please help.
>
> ~Ethan
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ---------------------~--> Tiny Wireless Camera under $80!
> Order Now! FREE VCR Commander! Click Here - Only 1 Day Left!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/WoOlbB/7.PDAA/ySSFAA> /HKFolB/TM
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------~->
>
> frontpage
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>



frontpage

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

I have just formatted my c drive, so i have installed
the personal web server again, and fp again.  Thing
is, when im working on a brand new site, making a
database, asp pages, FP reads the database fine but
when i want to  prewiev i locally in the explorer it
displays the mesage in my database field that it cant
make the connection.  I have done the odbc stuff.. but
is there something i might have forgotten somewer?

______________________________________________________
Sjekk snørapporter...
fra 500 ski-destinasjoner i Europa
på http://no.snow.yahoo.com/

A couple of our users are experiencing application errors when
performing basic editing functions within FrontPage. When they
highlight some text and press the delete key or perform cut/paste
operations, the application produces the following message: 'An
application error has occurred and an application error log has been
generated. FRONTPG.exe Exception: access violation (0xc0000005),
Address: 0x5f453ab6'. We are running NT4 Workstation, SP6.

Any ideas ?

Thanks,

Ric.

You may want to start here:

http://search.support.microsoft.com/kb/c.asp?ln=en-gb

Tom K

----- Original Message -----
From: "ricpike" <ric.pike@...>
To: <frontpage@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 4:28 AM
Subject: [frontpage] FP 2000 crashes when deleting or cutting/pasting


> A couple of our users are experiencing application errors when
> performing basic editing functions within FrontPage. When they
> highlight some text and press the delete key or perform cut/paste
> operations, the application produces the following message: 'An
> application error has occurred and an application error log has been
> generated. FRONTPG.exe Exception: access violation (0xc0000005),
> Address: 0x5f453ab6'. We are running NT4 Workstation, SP6.
>
> Any ideas ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ric.
>
>
>
> frontpage
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

I apologize for cross posting, but I wanted to reach as many people as
possible with this question.

I have a Database Query which searches a Street Database by address.
One of my fields is a Text field where the user would type his/her street
name.
Problem is, if someone hits the spacebar after the street name, they will
get an error (example "S Orange " will be an error, where "S Orange" will
be fine).

How do I get rid of the trailing space on the Street Name field?

The page in question can be found here:
http://www.cityoforlando.net/public_works/esd/gis/locator.asp

Any help would be great, thank you in advance for your help!!
____________________________________________________
Ethan M. Gomberg

Hi Group

For give me if this has been covered before, but I have searched and
searched for an answer and have come up with nada. I am having
troubles which seems to be a design concept which isn't working for
me. I'll take you a brief background trip...

I redesigned our company's website using top and bottom shared
borders for navigation links, as the previous bright spark had them
*static* (top and left) on ALL 400+ pages, making them overtly
susceptible to outdating (which of course became true). My simple
design was the top and bottom borders flush against the content, in
a "bordered" box style. Please feel free to take a look at
http://www.vacc.asn.au/

Now I have been told to redesign to a more in-your-face look (test
site at http://www.vacc.asn.au/newbvacc/), which would utilise top
and left borders. This concept works quite well with me because I can
just import my current content pages, being the way that I redesigned
it in the first place. Now we hit the rough spot...

Shared borders places an automatic distance beside the left and right
borders. Although you can change this top and bottom by specifying
Left/Left table alignment, nothing seems to work for the left and
right borders. I really need the content next to left border to be
flush against it.

Any ideas? Can I somehow overcome this, or do I need to go and change
all (currently) 502 pages again :(

Any help appreciated. Sorry if I've been long winded ;0)

Daryl

PS. The *new* page has been designed by someone who thinks she can be
a graphic artist with no web background. So it's looking a bit rough
at the moment ;)

>
> For give me if this has been covered before, but I have
searched and
> searched for an answer and have come up with nada. I am
having
> troubles which seems to be a design concept which isn't
working for
> me. I'll take you a brief background trip...


<body  leftmargin="0" topmargin="0" marginwidth="0"
marginheight="0">

Do you mean you want the left and top flush against the side
of the browser?... if so insert this above code into your
html.

if not can you explain again?

btw the second site does not have the bg configured. I know
it's a beta template.. just thought I would mention it:)...
Those top buttons are awful.. the side bar is nice.. we
won't mention the large graphics.. shush ;)

hth
Tina

AccessFP - FrontPage Resource Centre
Site -  http://www.accessfp.net/
Journal - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AccessFPJournal
Ezine & Forums - http://anyfrontpage.com/
Tina's FrontPage News
http://www.personal-computer-tutor.com/ABC.htm

>
> Do you mean you want the left and top flush against the side
> of the browser? if so insert ... code into your html.
>
> if not can you explain again?
>

Not quite the answer.. sorry. At least I know what I'm talking
about .. LOL. The issue is in the second site (black/red) where to
the right of the left shared border, there is a margin before the
content starts. This is highlighted by the 'broken' red line (above
the main section). When designing in FP, there is actually a
paragraph mark there which I can't move. It is the same for right
borders as well (in reverse), but not for top or bottom - they can be
flush to the content above/below (as in the first site).

> btw the second site does not have the bg configured. I know
> it's a beta template.. just thought I would mention it:)...
> Those top buttons are awful.. the side bar is nice.. we
> won't mention the large graphics.. shush ;)
>
Don't talk to me about those buttons.. hahahaha. They've caused no
end of grief cause I've opted to make them bgds to the cells rather
than individual graphics. And of course they want that top vertical
line coming down to the black line in the main section (only on the
index page) :-|

Thanks,
Daryl

FYI:
Current (flush shared borders top/bottom)
   http://www.vacc.asn.au/
New site (flush top/left shared border issue)
   http://www.vacc.asn.au/newbvacc/

Hi,

This is the first time I've really had a problem with FrontPage2ooo
running on Windows982E.

I've just removed some duplicated files online to my website at:

http://www.victorianturkishbath.org/

hosted by Hostcentric. For the past few months visitors have been using
the Search engine component which appears on the main home page (and
several others) without any problems.

After removeing the files I have, of course, recalculated the hyperlinks
(whichj I have done previously on many similar occasions).

After this edit, however, when I check the search engine for any phrase,
it comes up with zero results and the message:

Error from search: reading from the index file failed Serious error in
search: t.wti\All

I hate having things on my site which don't work (as we all do!).

Please can anyone tell me what to do?  Many, many thanks,

Malcolm

Leatherhaed, UK

--
Malcolm Shifrin
malcolm@...
A not-for-profit educational organisation

************************************************************
VISIT our website (augmented and updated monthly) at
         http://www.victorianturkishbath.org/
         Best viewed on Internet Explorer 4+

Non-pictorial information on the website, or from the underlying
databank, may
be used freely in not-for-profit projects, as can any photographs
credited Shifrin.

Acknowledgement should be made to Malcolm Shifrin's Victorian Turkish
Bath
website at: www.victorianturkishbath.org/

************************************************************

Malcolm,

I visited your homepage:  http://www.victorianturkishbath.org/ .   Very
professional.  I'm VERY impressed.

  ED in Tennessee
"And maybe I just made a fool out of myself, but that's OK! 'Cause it
happens all--it happens all the time and... I can be a fool, 'cause ...
never mind." Chris Pirillo Call For Help

ED R wrote:

> Malcolm,
>
> I visited your homepage:  http://www.victorianturkishbath.org/ .   Very
> professional.  I'm VERY impressed.

Thanks Ed. Your email was the first I read this morning and it cheered me up
no end.

I then decided to add an apology for the non-functioning search bot on my
splash page, republished the web, and miracle of miracles, the bot started to
work again.

Clearly the act of republishing the web cleared the problem. Can't think why
in all my four hours of fiddling around repeatedly recalculating the
hyperlinks, I hadn't tried to republish.

But I'd like to thank everyone who thought about the problem for me, and I
send the explanation in case it ever happens to anyone else.

With all best wishes,

Malcolm

--
Malcolm Shifrin
malcolm@...
A not-for-profit educational organisation

************************************************************
VISIT our website (augmented and updated monthly) at
         http://www.victorianturkishbath.org/
         Best viewed on Internet Explorer 4+

Non-pictorial information on the website, or from the underlying databank,
may
be used freely in not-for-profit projects, as can any photographs credited
Shifrin.

Acknowledgement should be made to Malcolm Shifrin's Victorian Turkish Bath
website at: www.victorianturkishbath.org/

************************************************************

When I embed an image using the resample option, do I need to have
the original image FTPd/published to the server or does the image
become part of the page, in which case I would not FTP/publish it to
the server?

Buck

> When I embed an image using the resample option, do I need
to have
> the original image FTPd/published to the server or does
the image
> become part of the page, in which case I would not
FTP/publish it to
> the server?
>
> Buck

My understanding of embed was that it meant save to the page
by inserting html that linked the picture to the page at
that spot.. (done automatically in FrontPage of course)....

Resampling just changes the picture from one setting with
more pixels to one with less.. which effectively is a new
picture.. and so has to be resaved... if you resample and
then of course you have to resave.. the new picture (I am
presuming your talking about doing this on the hard drive?)
will then reside on the hard drive.. and without
publishing/ftp to the server will  NOT appear there.. you
need to publish/ftp it to the server.. because it's a NEW
picture... and you need to update what you have on the hard
drive to the server..

Don't forget to recalculate hyperlinks under the tools menu
before doing so as always...
hth

Tina
AccessFP - FrontPage Resource Centre
Site -  http://www.accessfp.net/
Journal - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AccessFPJournal
Ezine & Forums - http://anyfrontpage.com/
Tina's FrontPage News
http://www.personal-computer-tutor.com/ABC.htm

Thanks, Tina!

Got it! You are as helpful as ever!

Buck

--- In frontpage@y..., "Tina Clarke" <tina@c...> wrote:
> > When I embed an image using the resample option, do I need
> to have
> > the original image FTPd/published to the server or does
> the image
> > become part of the page, in which case I would not
> FTP/publish it to
> > the server?
> >
> > Buck
>
> My understanding of embed was that it meant save to the page
> by inserting html that linked the picture to the page at
> that spot.. (done automatically in FrontPage of course)....
>
> Resampling just changes the picture from one setting with
> more pixels to one with less.. which effectively is a new
> picture.. and so has to be resaved... if you resample and
> then of course you have to resave.. the new picture (I am
> presuming your talking about doing this on the hard drive?)
> will then reside on the hard drive.. and without
> publishing/ftp to the server will  NOT appear there.. you
> need to publish/ftp it to the server.. because it's a NEW
> picture... and you need to update what you have on the hard
> drive to the server..
>
> Don't forget to recalculate hyperlinks under the tools menu
> before doing so as always...
> hth
>
> Tina
> AccessFP - FrontPage Resource Centre
> Site -  http://www.accessfp.net/
> Journal - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AccessFPJournal
> Ezine & Forums - http://anyfrontpage.com/
> Tina's FrontPage News
> http://www.personal-computer-tutor.com/ABC.htm

> Thanks, Tina!
>
> Got it! You are as helpful as ever!
>

Your welcome.. glad I made sense:)

Tina

AccessFP - FrontPage Resource Centre
Site -  http://www.accessfp.net/
Journal - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AccessFPJournal
Ezine & Forums - http://anyfrontpage.com/
Tina's FrontPage News
http://www.personal-computer-tutor.com/ABC.htm