Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
fusebox5
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 2 - 31 of 4398   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
2
I just wanted to welcome everyone to the discussion list and set some expectations. The core dev team is interested in hearing everyone's thoughts on the ...
Sean Corfield
seancorfield
Offline Send Email
Jan 26, 2006
11:32 pm
3
A feature that would be nice is the ability to declare and instantiate objects using <class> and <instantiate> with the ability to lock this process if the...
Michael Traher
miketraher
Offline Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
11:54 am
4
I'd like to see some steps toward backward compatability with Fusebox 3. I still use FB3, in part because I have a site with over 200 FB3 circuits. In order to...
Patrick McElhaney
rpm704
Offline Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
1:41 pm
5
... I can't see how 5 would accept your circuits "as is" if 4 doesn't....
Michael T. Tangorre
mtangorre
Online Now Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
1:48 pm
6
how about if we were to sub-task a volunteer to produce a quasi-converter stand-alone app for the FB3 apps, rather than building something into the core? ... ...
John Quarto-vonTivadar
jcquarto
Offline Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
2:47 pm
7
Do you mean an app that takes FB3 code and spits out FB5 code? I don't think that's possible, or even desirable. Patrick ... -- Patrick McElhaney 704.560.9117 ...
Patrick McElhaney
rpm704
Offline Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
3:05 pm
8
We have FB3 apps and on the whole we take the view that since they 'aint broke' ..... i.e. leave them running happily as FB3. We write new stuff in FB4. there...
Michael Traher
miketraher
Offline Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
3:09 pm
9
yeah Mike that's a good pointer and that's what I would do, cuz you can always just produce a non-FB-MVC app with such a convertor and then adapt from there. ...
John Quarto-vonTivadar
jcquarto
Offline Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
3:41 pm
10
... That's what I've been doing. That's what I'd like to continue doing. ... I'd like to have that as an option. But I can't add FB4 circuits to my existing...
Patrick McElhaney
rpm704
Offline Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
3:42 pm
11
... challenging "enhancements" ... I would have thought that adding the ability to parse FB3 natively would be a pretty effective way of adding bloat to the...
ianbuzer
Offline Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
4:11 pm
12
... I've been through seven versions of ColdFusion. I've never had to rewrite an application to move up to the next version and take advantage of new features....
Patrick McElhaney
rpm704
Offline Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
4:14 pm
13
Hi, Someone mentioned that, in using CFCs to code the framework, we'll be leaving the CF5 guys behind. Am I right in assuming that the framework will be...
ianbuzer
Offline Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
4:21 pm
14
... That's because MM ensured backwards compatibility. I think it is a lot to ask of the FB Farameworkers to ensure FBx is backwards compatible to FBy. Just my...
Michael T. Tangorre
mtangorre
Online Now Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
4:21 pm
15
... I knew that was coming. :) It depends whether you file it under feature request or bug fix. Regardless, if I'm the only one who wants it, it's bloat. ...
Patrick McElhaney
rpm704
Offline Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
4:25 pm
16
What new features of CF can you not leverage from an FB 3 application? Or is he talking about new features in the core file? What would those be? _____ From:...
Tim Heald
timothy_heald
Offline Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
4:26 pm
17
One problem with a lock=true/false is that there's no specification of what to lock, or how tightly. I.e. is it exclusive or read only? You want to lock a...
Barney Boisvert
barneyboisvert
Offline Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
4:26 pm
18
The conversion tool has its limitations (would not convert a large site we tried it on) but I thought it was worth a try! Maybe someone could look at this (as...
Michael Traher
miketraher
Offline Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
4:38 pm
19
Just thinking aloud.... Would it be possible / worthwhile to implement the core files in Java? The objective being to have the ability to use the same core...
ianbuzer
Offline Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
4:40 pm
20
You can write a very simple DO UDF or custom tag that acts much the same as the DO verb in FB4.x. Remove all your fbx_Layouts and fbx_Settings (except for...
Barney Boisvert
barneyboisvert
Offline Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
4:43 pm
21
... CFMX 6.1 is the target release. It will not run on CFMX 6.0 (which, frankly, no one should be running). It will not require CFMX 7. There may be *optional*...
Sean Corfield
seancorfield
Offline Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
4:49 pm
22
I would say the XML does implement the application - it is not just 'fusedocs', circuit.xml and fusebox.xml cause cf code to be generated and executed. However...
Michael Traher
miketraher
Offline Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
4:53 pm
23
... Balancing 100% backward compatibility against a major architecture improvement or a key new feature is tricky. FB41 wasn't quite 100% compatible with FB4...
Sean Corfield
seancorfield
Offline Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
4:56 pm
24
Part of FB is it's zero-config install, and from talking with Sean, that's going to continue to be an important facet of the framework (and I'm glad of it)....
Barney Boisvert
barneyboisvert
Offline Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
4:57 pm
25
... Interesting idea! I certainly want to clean up some of the CFC support and this might fall into that area. No promises but I'll put this in the "CFC...
Sean Corfield
seancorfield
Offline Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
5:04 pm
26
... No. Think this one thru and it should be obvious why... :) Sean A Corfield An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "I have always wished that my...
Sean Corfield
seancorfield
Offline Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
5:09 pm
27
... I agree. I think one of the main reasons to adopt a framework is stability. When I write code in a public framework, I want to know that there's thousands...
Patrick McElhaney
rpm704
Offline Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
5:20 pm
28
... Java? ... Err..... no, give up. It would need a CF / JSP default page to call the framework. And it would need to read the scriptLanguage parameter to...
ianbuzer
Offline Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
5:30 pm
29
Actually, I meant that the other way. ;) That the lack of backwards compatibiilty as a focus wasn't a bad thing. Backwards compatibility is great, but it's...
Barney Boisvert
barneyboisvert
Offline Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
6:09 pm
30
... I don't see how that is possible from a technical point of view (but I'm open to proposals - see below). There are several FB3 features that simply went...
Sean Corfield
seancorfield
Offline Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
7:08 pm
31
... If you make the "run a fuseaction" module abstract, you could run two implementations, one for FB3 circuits and one for FB4+ circuits. So when you need to...
Barney Boisvert
barneyboisvert
Offline Send Email
Jan 27, 2006
7:23 pm
Messages 2 - 31 of 4398   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help