David, Can we add a link from the Sample applications page to your Shopping Cart please? Do you have any plans to update it in any way for Fusebox 5.1 or 5.5? ...
David, Is there a sample application running anywhere. I couldn't find a link on your Fekke.com website? I would be interested in seeing your cart in action. ...
Where is the cfPartmart app? From: fusebox5@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fusebox5@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Nick Tong Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 4:53 PM To:...
Hey all, I've got an error somewhere in one of my circuit files; I've had these in the past and they're pretty hard to find. At some point, one version of a...
Reiter, Jordan
reiterj@...
Jul 4, 2007 5:37 pm
2249
For "validating" circuit files, we use a tool called RUWF (Are You Well Formed). You can find that here: http://www.xml.com/pub/a/tools/ruwf/check.html...
The newest version of CFEclipse (1.3) comes with a Frameworks Explorer which works with Fusebox 4/5. Note that it only works on Eclipse 3.2 for the moment. A...
Pretty sure it's XMLBuddy that we use at work (Eclipse plugin). The syntax highlighting and outline will just stop at the bad portion of your XML. I've used it...
... The only error Fusebox can display is the error ColdFusion gives it. So, you get what you get. I would strongly recommend using XML Buddy as a free plugin...
Or do yourself a huge favor and drop the ching on oXygen... I did so and never looked back... One of the best choices I ever made. It blows XMLBuddy and the...
We are going to fusebox the entire app! However, we have some existing FB5 apps embedded in the system which now need to be pointed down a level to the site...
... Remember that the paths are relative to the *application root* and specifying parent only affects pre/post-fuseactions that have callsuper="true" - it has...
Hi All, As you may know I've been doing some workshops over on the http://cfFrameworks.com website. Sean has kindly offered to do a workshop on the 2nd Aug but...
I've seen this error talked about on the fusebox forums and the Yahoo groups. The only solution I saw was in regards to debug settings... turning off Report...
... You simply need a longer request timeout. Fusebox 5 just takes longer to start up than Fusebox 4.1, especially the very first time you run the core files...
In the server settings? ________________________________ From: fusebox5@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fusebox5@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Sean Corfield Sent:...
And also... what would you recommend. Our current server setting is 45 sec. I'm a little nervous about raising it too much because this is a production...
... You can change it on a per-request basic using <cfsetting> - I'm thinking that it might be a good addition to Fusebox 5.5 to automatically override this...
Server is CF7. I'll try your work-around tomorrow. Thanks for getting back to me so quick. I'll let you know what happens. ... From: fusebox5@yahoogroups.com...
... Yes. Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret...
could/should this setting just be limited to the startup - so maybe place it in the init function or will the request have started by then? ... -- Nick Tong ...
You can override the request timeout setting anywhere in the request any time before it has reached the end or timed out. ... -- Chris Phillips www.cfchris.com...
Sorry guys... this may be a stupid question but where would I specify the actual timeout value in seconds? In the URL? If I add this code to my index.cfm,...
... http://trac.fuseboxframework.org/fusebox/ticket/232 Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying...
... The timeout extension needs to happen before the Fusebox core files start to load because that's the part that takes time. Here's what you - Fusebox users...
If you're having a problem with this, I might suggest something like the following: index.cfm: <cfset request.pageStartTime = getTickCount()> <cfsetting...
The problem was solved but your suggestion is very interesting. Would you use something like this in production (after framework was initialized for the 1st...