Sean, Glad I could help a little... I'm able to keep progressing, as I've place the app in production mode and just do a loadclean and a parseall after...
Hi, In 4.1, I conceived of fusebox.init.cfm as, essentially, application.cfm (i.e., runs before everything). So I used fusebox.init.cfm to initialize...
... Hi Sean, Thanks for the info. The rtf file posted in the Alpha3 floder on this site has a section 'Application Initialization', under which it recommends,...
... It means: Either use fusebox.appinit.cfm or <appinit> global fuseaction, but not both. It's not talking about fusebox.init.cfm (which can be used with...
... I've made some changes to how locking is handled and I believe I have a fix for this now. I am able to run Terry's test, repeatedly clicking all the AJAX...
I still haven't gotten around to putting this on the wiki but I have done quite a bit of work on it over the last couple of days (yes, at the cat show in...
There's a fair chance this is just a UTS/ID10t error on my part, but in FB4, I have some lexicons that look sort of like this: <cfset fb_.parsedfile =...
Some history on that: When John first built the 4.0 cores, he did manual string appends to fb_.parsedfile. That was both rather cumbersome and restrictive to ...
... As Barney indicates, if you use fb_appendLine(), it will work with both FB41 and FB5. Since the behavior of lexicons in FB41 was completely undocumented ...
... Well, we've established that it doesn't entirely fix the problem and digging into his new example shows that this is an almost impossibly hard problem to...
How much cost is there for a read-only CFLOCK? I've never taken the time to care, but I'm wondering if it's truly an unacceptable cost to throw a read-only...
I was hoping to have Beta 2 ready to go out today but it's not there yet. A couple of (minor) FB41 compatibility issues were uncovered that I really want to...
Sean, Thanks for letting us know, but don't sweat it. You're doing an amazing job on FB5. I, for one, am always impressed, and I'm sure no one is literally ...
... The compatibility issues have been addressed and I've worked through a few more minor issues that I really wanted to get into the Beta for testing before...
I have a question about appinit. I'm trying to use appinit to call an initialization fuseaction in my model circuit. This fuseaction initializes reactor and...
Are you using a security plugin that fires prefuseaction? The appinit fuseactions (in beta 1) still call the plugins like any other fuseactions. This problem...
... Okay....I am stupid! typo alert! I was using <appint></appint> instead of <appinit></appinit>. That leads to the question however of shouldn't fusebox...
... Fixed for Beta 2: http://projects.simb.net/fusebox/trac.cgi/ticket/49 See also the documentation which comments on this in the description of <appinit>: ...
... Since <appinit> is optional, Fusebox is still happy if it doesn't find it :) Mostly Fusebox ignores unknown (but well-formed) XML during compilation. Beta...
... Terry has confirmed this. I will update the documentation accordingly. "development-no-load" mode will be the recommended mode for developing applications...
... As odd as it sounds I do want readable parsed files, since the "speed" up is in development mode and does not really affect the performance profile of the...
... How about if it meant cutting compile/parse time in half? I discovered some CFC "tricks" that have changed the "development-no- load" time (with...
Go for speed over readability for the parsed files. If you are looking at parsed files, then I suppose you do it to see how they are built. You wouldn't...
I vote for speed as well. Perception is everything and one of the perceptions of FB is that it is slow (mostly because most people think of FB speed as in...