Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
glosalist
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Language   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #1050 of 1305 |
Hello Michel,
I read through the Naom Chomsky speech (rather hurriedly). As for Esperanto
- and for that matter presumably Glosa - not being a language - I'll take the
accepted dictionary definition that a language is... "a system for the
expression of thoughts, feelings, etc. by the use of spoken sounds or
conventional symbols."... It may be a simplistic view but in the real world
that is what it is and - ultimately - the world's population will want an
"international" language to facilitate communication - of that I am confident -
Glosa maybe? Many don't like the idea but the fact is we are "one people"
living in "one world" - it's a melting pot and we are all interdependent.
However with nationalistic sentiments still running high no "national" language
(i.e. English, French, Chinese etc) is likely to be accepted. Mystification of
the term "language" by those such as Chomsky is irrelevant in my humble view and
I also dismiss the "cultural factor" as an objection to a constructed language
such as Esperanto, Glosa etc. After all millions of people re-locate
themselves to "foreign" countries and consequently live in different cultures -
many will learn their adopted country's language and communicate without
problems and without having the cultural background. The Chomsky view that all
intelligible languages are founded on some kind of "deep structure" of
grammatical rules that are universal and correspond to an innate capacity of the
human brain also doesn't make sense to me because I am aware that other
languages express things in what to me (brought up to speak English) is a "back
to front" way that can be extremely confusing. Therefore languages don't all
follow the same grammatical pattern.
Regards, David



I

--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for Personal use.
SPAMfighter has removed 2922 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len

The Trial and Professional version does not have this message in the email


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:32 pm

ecclesonc
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #1050 of 1305 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Hello Michel, I read through the Naom Chomsky speech (rather hurriedly). As for Esperanto - and for that matter presumably Glosa - not being a language -...
David
ecclesonc
Offline Send Email
Oct 13, 2008
12:32 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help