Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
harmonicanalysis · Harmonic Analysis
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
a multiplier operator on the n-torus   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #434 of 450 |
Re: a multiplier operator on the n-torus

This reply assumes that you left out a square root: (1+|m|^2)^{(n/2-1)/2}.

This operator may be expressed as convolution with a kernel k(x) which has a
singularity like |x|^{-n/2-1} at the origin. The kernel just fails to belong to
L^{2n/(n-2)} (it's in the corresponding weak space). If it actually did belong
to this particular L^p space, the boundedness question you asked would be an
immediate consequence of Young's inequality for convolutions. To take care of
the details, you should look at the proof of the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev
inequality appearing in Stein's _Harmonic Analysis_ (the proof there is for R^n,
but it goes through on the torus without any significant changes).

-Philip

--- In harmonicanalysis@yahoogroups.com, "lakhmau" <lakhmau@...> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to know why the (Bessel-like ?) operator which maps
>
> exp(2i.pi.m.x) |-> exp(2i.pi.m.x) / (1 + |m|^2)^{n/2 - 1}
>
> for any multi-index m \in \Z^n maps the space
>
> L^{n/(n-1)}((0,1)^n)
>
> into L^2((0,1)^n) ?
>
> Sorry, the post is not really readable...
>
> Thanks,
> L.
>





Thu May 14, 2009 4:02 pm

ptgressman
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #434 of 450 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Dear all, I would like to know why the (Bessel-like ?) operator which maps exp(2i.pi.m.x) |-> exp(2i.pi.m.x) / (1 + |m|^2)^{n/2 - 1} for any multi-index m \in...
lakhmau
Offline Send Email
May 14, 2009
3:18 pm

This reply assumes that you left out a square root: (1+|m|^2)^{(n/2-1)/2}. This operator may be expressed as convolution with a kernel k(x) which has a...
Philip Gressman
ptgressman
Offline Send Email
May 14, 2009
11:11 pm

Thanks a lot....
lakhmau
Offline Send Email
May 15, 2009
3:41 pm

... I have an elementary proof of a similar result at the end of the paper: http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen/preprints/thin.html You may be able to adopt...
Stephen Montgomery-Sm...
stephenmontg...
Offline Send Email
May 15, 2009
1:45 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help