Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
http-compliance · discussion about HTTP compliance testing and tests
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Test Cases / Plan for doing http compliance testing   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #32 of 117 |
Hi,

I would like to know if there is a tabularised checklist kind of
a thing available anywhere, so that we can verify the http compliance
of a component against the list. Typically, what I am looking for
is a list of "MUST", "SHOULD" cases.


Also, I would like to know if there are any FREE tools available
to do the HTTP compliance testing.

If any one of you are aware of one, kindly let me know.

Thanks,
-Gayathri




Fri Aug 10, 2001 9:14 am

gaya377@...
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #32 of 117 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Hi, I would like to know if there is a tabularised checklist kind of a thing available anywhere, so that we can verify the http compliance of a component...
gaya377@...
Send Email
Aug 10, 2001
9:14 am

... Yes. RFC 2616 is, essentially, a list of MUST and SHOULD (and MAY) cases. A table would have to consist of pointers to RFC paragraphs/sections. Some...
Alex Rousskov
rousskov@...
Send Email
Aug 10, 2001
1:33 pm

One of the 2616 authors used to have a checklist of requirements sitting around... I think I have a reference, will have to dig around. Anyway, it was really...
Mark Nottingham
mnot@...
Send Email
Aug 10, 2001
10:53 pm

Here is a feature checklist: http://www.agranat.com:1998/ Also, see http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/Forum/Reports/ for reports on existing implementations. ...
Carl Kugler
kugler@...
Send Email
Aug 13, 2001
4:46 pm

... This is a cool compilation! While the items are just "features" and many are not really testable protocol items, it is very handy indeed. The second URL...
Alex Rousskov
rousskov@...
Send Email
Aug 13, 2001
5:09 pm

Note that these reports are from around 1998, so the implementations might be more compliant now. -Carl Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-fa To:...
Carl Kugler
kugler@...
Send Email
Aug 13, 2001
6:21 pm

Actually, I was refering to the attached draft (just found it; got it from Ross about a year ago). Ross wanted to make sure it's understood it isn't official,...
Mark Nottingham
mnot@...
Send Email
Aug 16, 2001
1:11 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help