Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
http-compliance · discussion about HTTP compliance testing and tests
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Test Cases / Plan for doing http compliance testing   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #37 of 117 |
Re: [http-compliance] Test Cases / Plan for doing http compliance testing


Note that these reports are from around 1998, so the implementations might
be more compliant now.

-Carl





Alex Rousskov
<rousskov@measurement-fa To:
http-compliance@yahoogroups.com
ctory.com> cc: gaya377@...
Subject: Re:
[http-compliance] Test Cases / Plan for doing http compliance
08/13/2001 11:08 AM testing
Please respond to
http-compliance






On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Carl Kugler wrote:

> Here is a feature checklist: http://www.agranat.com:1998/
>
> Also, see http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/Forum/Reports/ for reports on
> existing implementations.

This is a cool compilation! While the items are just "features" and
many are not really testable protocol items, it is very handy indeed.

The second URL can also be used to verify my assertion that no serious
HTTP application is fully HTTP/1.1 compliant (if you trust internal
testing efforts of Netscapes and Microsofts of the world, of course).

Thanks a lot,

Alex.


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
http-compliance-unsubscribe@egroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/









Mon Aug 13, 2001 6:20 pm

kugler@...
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #37 of 117 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Hi, I would like to know if there is a tabularised checklist kind of a thing available anywhere, so that we can verify the http compliance of a component...
gaya377@...
Send Email
Aug 10, 2001
9:14 am

... Yes. RFC 2616 is, essentially, a list of MUST and SHOULD (and MAY) cases. A table would have to consist of pointers to RFC paragraphs/sections. Some...
Alex Rousskov
rousskov@...
Send Email
Aug 10, 2001
1:33 pm

One of the 2616 authors used to have a checklist of requirements sitting around... I think I have a reference, will have to dig around. Anyway, it was really...
Mark Nottingham
mnot@...
Send Email
Aug 10, 2001
10:53 pm

Here is a feature checklist: http://www.agranat.com:1998/ Also, see http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/Forum/Reports/ for reports on existing implementations. ...
Carl Kugler
kugler@...
Send Email
Aug 13, 2001
4:46 pm

... This is a cool compilation! While the items are just "features" and many are not really testable protocol items, it is very handy indeed. The second URL...
Alex Rousskov
rousskov@...
Send Email
Aug 13, 2001
5:09 pm

Note that these reports are from around 1998, so the implementations might be more compliant now. -Carl Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-fa To:...
Carl Kugler
kugler@...
Send Email
Aug 13, 2001
6:21 pm

Actually, I was refering to the attached draft (just found it; got it from Ross about a year ago). Ross wanted to make sure it's understood it isn't official,...
Mark Nottingham
mnot@...
Send Email
Aug 16, 2001
1:11 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help