Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
http-compliance · discussion about HTTP compliance testing and tests
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Chunked POST   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #91 of 117 |
Re: [http-compliance] Chunked POST

Mark,

FYI: Since supporting chunked encoded _messages_ is a MUST,
our HTTP compliance test suite has test cases that use chunked
_requests_. So far, none of the HTTP/1.1 proxies we have tested passed
all test cases with chunked requests. Some crashed.

So, regardless of the official position, this feature is not
well supported (yet?). Based on anecdotal evidence related to our
tests, many implementors seem to be taken by surprise: "ah, looks like
this MUST be supported, but we did not know that!".

To answer one of your questions, a client can reasonably
expect that their chunked POST will fail if there is a proxy in the
way. Hopefully, the situation will improve once we get implementors
attention.

Alex.

P.S. You can also find a few real-world cases with chunked requests:
http://www.google.com/search?q=chunked+request
http://www.google.com/search?q=chunked+request+Microsoft

On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Mark Nottingham wrote:

> Can someone remind me what the state of the art is re: chunked
> POST? From what I can see, it's allowed, but there's not a good
> interoperability story with 1.0, so it's mostly avoided.
>
> What's the official position, and what can a client reasonably
> expect if they chunk a POST and there's a 1.1 server somewhere in
> the message path?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> http-compliance-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>




Tue Jun 11, 2002 4:17 pm

rousskov@...
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #91 of 117 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Can someone remind me what the state of the art is re: chunked POST? From what I can see, it's allowed, but there's not a good interoperability story with 1.0,...
Mark Nottingham
mnotting
Online Now Send Email
Jun 11, 2002
4:12 am

Mark- I can't speak for the official position. The primary interoperability problem is due to CGI 1.1 (and earlier). CGI REQUIRES a CONTENT-LENGTH. Some...
Carl Kugler
carlk3
Offline Send Email
Jun 11, 2002
3:28 pm

Mark, FYI: Since supporting chunked encoded _messages_ is a MUST, our HTTP compliance test suite has test cases that use chunked _requests_. So far, none of...
Alex Rousskov
rousskov@...
Send Email
Jun 11, 2002
4:17 pm

Thanks. So, from a client perspective, they might expect any of the following behaviours when sending a chunked POST; a) success b) 411 Length Required c) 5xx...
Mark Nottingham
mnotting
Online Now Send Email
Jun 11, 2002
4:59 pm

... e) a malformed/invalid message reaches the server (proxy corrupts message body and/or headers because it does not understand what is going on); the server...
Alex Rousskov
rousskov@...
Send Email
Jun 11, 2002
5:07 pm

[Alex Rousskov: Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 11:07:10AM -0600] ... f) 100 continue -Patrick...
Patrick McManus
mcmanus@...
Send Email
Jun 11, 2002
5:14 pm

... g) nothing (i.e., the recipient [erroneously] waits for more data, without sending 100 continue) Alex....
Alex Rousskov
rousskov@...
Send Email
Jun 11, 2002
5:24 pm

h) 413 Request Entity Too Large. -Carl Alex Rousskov <rousskov@...> 06/11/2002 11:24 AM Please respond to http-compliance To:...
Carl Kugler
carlk3
Offline Send Email
Jun 11, 2002
5:37 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help