Nobody decided to "end free discussion." The owners of this list extended
the opportunity for people to set up their own mailing lists and announce
them here, which some have done.

If you don't like their decision, you can set up your own list and announce
it here.

The owners of the list are not obligated to run the list in a way that we
demand. The list is run on *their* time and energy. People who want that
environment can set up their own and announce them here.

Frankly, they are being responsible my recognizing the limitations of their
intended scope and final project. It's not easy to "end" or drastically
change a community.

Solutions to all complaints about the change in format: Start your own list.

On Nov 28, 2007 5:47 PM, John C. Turmel <bc726@...> wrote:

> >#8471From: "cwilli5210" <CWilli5210@>
> > >Date: Mon Oct 29, 2007 1:21 pm
> > >Subject: Future of IJCCR discussion group cwilli5210
> >
> > CW: Dear IJCCR discussion group members,
> > As Editor of the IJCCR journal for some ten years, and also
> > hands-off moderator of this Group for the same time, I would
> > like to announce that the new Editorial Board of the journal
> > has decided that this 'discussion list' is not fulfilling
> > its original aim, which was to be a forum for discussion of
> > the issues arising in the journal articles.
> >
>
> > JCT: So how many people made the decision to end free
> > discussion? And who were in on the decision?
>
> Jct: We're still waiting to find out who was in on the decision to end
> discussion in this group. I know the members had no say. So who did?
>
>
>



--
--
Rich Vázquez, CISSP, CISA


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]