Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
inpeople · interesting, interested people
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Re: Digest Number 92   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #335 of 357 |
I think there is a difference in types of forgiveness, which muddies the
discussion of religious perspectives on forgiveness. There is the type in
which God forgives our sins. Only he can do that, and it doesn't necessarily
mean that we will not suffer earthly consequences of those sins; rather, it
means that he no longer holds them against us when accounting for our
salvation.

Then there is the type of forgiveness that we are called to practice and to
give one another in the world. To me, the function of this forgiveness is to
do something for me rather than for the one I forgive. When Jesus told the
disciples to forgive "seventy times seven," I think he meant to go beyond
what seems reasonable, or to stop trying to quantify forgiveness. He knew
that the act of forgiving does good for the forgiver, allowing him to avoid
being dominated and emotionally consummed by anger and hatred. One of my
favorite quotes says, "Holding onto bitterness and resentment is like
swallowing poison and expecting the other person to die." Forgiving allows
us to let go of the anger and resentment we hold for others, which hurts us
more than them and interferes with our ability to revel in our worship and
relationship with God. It also facilites our becoming emotionally healthy.
Forgiveness is different from reconciliation; sometimes it is better for
people to not reconcile or ever be around each other again, but for his own
good the one wronged could forgive and move on. When I work on forgiveness
with clients, we talk about knowing you've truly forgiven when you can
honestly wish the other person well rather than having negative feelings
evoked upon seeing or hearing of them.

So in Wiesenthal's story, the act of forgiving the Nazi would not have
absolved the Nazi of his sins - that would be between him and God. Gaining a
person's forgiveness would have helped the Nazi feel better on a human
level, and could be looked at as a step toward acknowledging a wrong and
making retribution. But more than that, forgiving would have been an act
that would have affected Wiesenthal's heart, as he let go of anger and
hatred toward the Nazis. To me, that would be nearly impossible to do during
the actual imprisonment.

Rich




Mon May 26, 2003 9:58 pm

gbrakr
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #335 of 357 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

I think there is a difference in types of forgiveness, which muddies the discussion of religious perspectives on forgiveness. There is the type in which God...
Rich
gbrakr
Offline Send Email
May 26, 2003
9:58 pm

rich writes: <<So in Wiesenthal's story, the act of forgiving the Nazi would not have absolved the Nazi of his sins - that would be between him and God. >> ...
barry brake
bbbbarry
Offline Send Email
May 27, 2003
5:34 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help