I forgot to mention that commenting out "removeAllProtos()" will also "fix" the behaviour, so that might have something to do with it as well.. Hans Begin...
SainTiss
saintiss@...
Mar 1, 2006 10:53 am
8411
Hi, attached is a self-runnable file which produces some really strange output: INSIDE PRODUCT Object_0x863f80: Course = Object_0x82e940 STARTING...
SainTiss
saintiss@...
Mar 1, 2006 11:08 am
8412
... OpenGL doesn't know how to load textures. If you wanted to load textures, you'd use the utility objects. ... Everything that is not the core OpenGL...
... That was it. (Why didn't I try that myself? :) ... Which object do I send the setPath message to? I have noticed something; maybe I am doing something...
... That would depend entirely on just what L7Io is supposed to be. Google has nothing meaningful to say on that string, nor on variations using combinations...
... I'll come back to this later, look for a [1]. ... This is not correct behaviour, this is what is commonly known as an off by one error, and is most likely...
... Io treats a message as including all attached and all next messages. So, in your code, when <forward> is called, it passes the current message (tree) to...
Hi Everyone, First off, I've been learing C/C++ as a hobby for many many years now. Nothing serious, just messing around. I'm also a big fan of Python. I came...
... The demos largely suffer from severe code rot. For example, "Buffer" was replaced many months ago. Buffer was a mutable string implementation I guess you...
I've compiled 2006-02-14 for Cygwin on Windows with a little fudging: http://www.mike-austin.com/io/IoFull-Cygwin-2006-02-14.zip Shouldn't the options in...
... tried to use ... This was the same issue I keep getting into. lots of missing libs everywhere. It's really to bad because the main thing I wanted to do ...
... Although I haven't gotten any of the sample apps to run either, I have gotten a little farther in the debugging process. See my post with the subject...
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 15:59:13 -0600 ... Ok, this would be a reasonable explanation, except I don't see how it explains that the first time, "BaseModel print"...
SainTiss
saintiss@...
Mar 3, 2006 8:36 am
8430
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 15:59:13 -0600 ... Is this really intended behaviour? Can you conceive any case where this is desirable? I mean, it certainly seems more...
SainTiss
saintiss@...
Mar 3, 2006 8:42 am
8431
Hi Kevin, ... I use a shorter solution. forward := method( _list doMessage(call message clone setNextMessage(nil) setAttachedMessage(nil), call sender) ) ...
Hi SainTiss, In this email I (attempt to) demonstrate why it is unlikely that "call message" will be changed to omit next and attached messages. I apologise...
Now that I look at this, it seems part of my misunderstanding stems from the fact that I don't really get a clear view of the nextMessages structure... For...
SainTiss
saintiss@...
Mar 3, 2006 2:23 pm
8434
Hmm, I was too quick.. I think the explanation is quite simple: the self writeln("BUSY PRODUCT") message is probably the next message of "self", not of...
SainTiss
saintiss@...
Mar 3, 2006 2:29 pm
8435
... Yup, I think you've figured it out. And, due to your original bug, the <nil> is the value of <BaseModel> in the second iteration, since <forward> returns...
... That is a beautiful proposal, Jonathan. It's easy to read and understand. I hope it will serve as the prototype for others. Calling you an Io Nazi may be...
Hello, I see there are two ways to bind C-land to Io-land, through the DynLib prototype, and by just writing the C binding by hand. In what context would one...
I just corrected this issue a few minutes ago, you can pull the changes from my darcs repository at: http://repos.blurgle.ca/darcs/ io ... I'm not sure how...
... That would be for you to determine, both are equally acceptable in my opinion; though the DynLib approach kinda goes out the window on platforms that don't...
