Having problems with message search?
Its a link to a paper.
The paper might be of interest for reading/studying which is mostly what I do with regard to SNe.
I can see from the title why you would think sn 2008es is supposed to be observably bright. But I think this refers to its intrinsic or absolute brightness (not apparent magnitude).
Type II-L seemed unusual.
C. Bell H47 Vicksburghttp://cometskies.com
----- Original Message ----
From: space964 <space11@...>
To: isn_chat@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 8:03:44 PM
Subject: [isn_chat] Re: Discovery of the Ultra-Bright Type II-L Supernova 2008es
From: space964 <space11@...>
To: isn_chat@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 8:03:44 PM
Subject: [isn_chat] Re: Discovery of the Ultra-Bright Type II-L Supernova 2008es
--- In isn_chat@yahoogroup s.com, Charles Bell <cbellh47@.. .> wrote:
>
> Discovery of the Ultra-Bright Type II-L Supernova 2008es
> http://arxiv. org/abs/0808. 2812
>
> C. Bell H47 Vicksburg
> http://cometskies. com
>
I don't understand ? She is visible in the sky ?
Thank you ?
Offline 
Send Email