Great, I am not sure if SWT really better than swing or not, but
several big firm make the IT policy of GUI selection with SWT, we have
to use it :-)

On Dec 30, 2007 11:09 PM, Alex Ruiz <alruiz15@...> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks! We expect to start looking into SWT in 2008, depending on when
> the 1.0 Swing version is released :)
>
> Best regards,
> -Alex
>
> --- In java-gui-testing@yahoogroups.com, "Carfield Yim" <carfield@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > Look cool, how about SWT support??
> >
> > On Dec 28, 2007 10:22 PM, Alex Ruiz <alruiz15@...> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In java-gui-testing@yahoogroups.com, "Alastair Montgomery"
> > >
> > > <a.montgomery@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks I'll have a look at Abbot and Xstudio.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hi Alastair,
> > >
> > > Another good alternative for Swing GUI testing is FEST (
> > > http://fest.easytesting.org/swing/ ). Its main features are:
> > >
> > > 1. Compact API that is easy to read and write (uses fluent interfaces
> > > to create a DSL-oriented API)
> > > 2. Supports both JUnit and TestNG
> > > 3. Embeds screenshots of failed GUI tests in both JUnit and TestNG
> > > HTML reports
> > >
> > > Also, please take a look at the latest SNAPSHOT release (version
> > > 0.8-SNAPSHOT) at
> > >
> > >
>
>
http://fest.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/fest/m2/repository/fest/fest-swing/0.8-SNAP\
SHOT/
> > >
> > > The changelog for this release can be found at
> > > http://fest.easytesting.org/swing/changes-report.html
> > >
> > > We are in the process of updating the project's documentation before
> > > having a full 0.8 release (next week.) This release adds new features
> > > and is focused on making test troubleshooting easier. For example,
> > > when a GUI component is not found, the ComponentLookupException
> thrown
> > > shows a list of available components in the hierarchy. Such list uses
> > > indentation to better understand such hierarchy.
> > >
> > > I hope that helps.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > -Alex.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>