From: Adrian <adrian.mutimer@...>
Subject: [Joe Cell Free Energy Device] Re: mind over matter
To: joecellfreeenergydevice@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, July 3, 2009, 7:50 AM

James, hello, nice to hve you here again.

I don't get all of this, mainly becuase of my ignorance about triacs, which ignorance I will fix sometime today (if I can).

However there is a question that you may be able to answer. In several cold electricity epxeriments I have seen the people involved use a whole line of diodes all connected up to each other in series. I have seen cases where 20 were used! But why? I cannot see why more than one is needed. What is the logic behind this?

Bernie, do you know?

If you go back a year, I asked this group if anyone knew how to stop the hot stuff and pass the cold stuff, and nobody knew. But if I am not wrong, what is being said here is that it is not difficult to do this, it is just very difficult to measure the cold stuff so it has been very hard to know when one has been successful. It seems that the oil effect is taken as a measure of succeess, and with good reason, as Bernie has pointed out, what else is it really likely to be? What would be funky is to have an independent way of measuring it.
If as has been said the effects of the oil cell and th Joe Cell are essentially the same then this independent measure would be supporting evidence, or at least a very valuable tool.

Regards

Adrian
--- In joecellfreeenergyde vice@yahoogroups .com, "jgosscacc1" <jgosscacc@. ..> wrote:
>
>
> Hello Bernie, Adrian and all,
>
> I have been away for a few months and was getting caught up on things.
> You may remember I did an experiment a few months back and determined as
> long as two electrical conductive parts were in physical contact with
> each other, only separated by a thin film of oil, and as long as the two
> parts have relative motion, the film of oil keeps the two components
> electrically insulated from each other. When relative motion stops, the
> two metal parts will again make electrical contact. Bernie, this may be
> why the oil appears to give up its energy overnight and requires time to
> reactivate itself the next day. Even if the car battery overnight
> activated the diodes, the rotating metal components of the engine, while
> at rest, may be allowing the crank to neutralize its charge.
>
> It may also be a requirement that the alternator be on line and running
> before the oil can be booted up. It would be interesting to know if the
> diodes would still influence the oil if they were supplied by a voltage
> source other than the alternator, such as a 12-volt battery that is
> electrically isolated from engine operation.
>
> In my oil experiment I was comparing the conductivity of new and used
> motor oil. Not much difference in that they both would only pass a few
> microamps of current with a source voltage up to 550 volts dc. If the
> diodes are used to block hot electricity and pass cold electricity, it
> seems that the oil itself would block hot electricity while passing cold
> without the use of reversed diodes. Bernie, have you tried using three
> or more diodes instead of two? As it is the two diodes, the oil, and
> source voltage form a series circuit. In this case the two reversed
> diodes appear as an open circuit, as does the oil, and will tend to drop
> the source voltage across that open. The question is which of the two
> appears to be the most open circuit. I believe I determined the oil
> represented the greatest open when I ran the oil experiment with an open
> gate triac placed in series with the oil. Adding more reversed diodes in
> series may allow the oil to appear as less of an open circuit and the
> diodes as more of an open circuit, which might amplify whatever is
> taking place. Using a string of diodes with taps at their junctions may
> be a way to tune the system.
>
> Thanks, James Goss.
>