Thanks for this.

Rob, you are supercomfortable working on your guts. I tend to distrust mine to some extent. This has to do with my Christian upbringing where it is drummed into you how easy it is to get info from sources that are not working in your best interests. I think that whole thing is vastly exagerated by Christians, but unfortunately it is there, deep in my guts, and it is so well embedded it would be futile to attmept to remove it. What I do is work round it with as much awareness as I can bring to bear.

Anway the problem with working on one's guts is that often we don't know why we have done something -or even why we think something.. If an explanation follows later it is often just a way to cover over a hole in the logic that would othrwise be there. I belivee Joe has done a great deal of this "after the fact" theory making.

Regards

Adrian
--- In joecellfreeenergyde vice@yahoogroups .com, Rob Peters <petersrob73@ ...> wrote:
>
> Hello Adrian,
>
>  Â  It just felt right at the time.
> Also,I had to determine where things
> were coming and going from.
> The cell receives from the vast sea
> of frequencies.
> The engine acclimates to the cell.
>
> Shalom,
>   Rob
>
>
>
>
> ____________ _________ _________ __
> From: Adrian <adrian.mutimer@ ...>
> To: joecellfreeenergyde vice@yahoogroups .com
> Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2009 8:25:40 AM
> Subject: Re: [Joe Cell Free Energy Device] THE man-made UFO and the CELL â€â€Å" again
>
>
>
>
>
> Were you getting static shocks? Is that what made you do it?
>
> A--- In joecellfreeenergyde vice@yahoogroups .com, Rob Peters <petersrob73@ ...> wrote:
> >
> > Hello guys,
> >
> >  Â  Yes,I tried the strap to kill the static.
> > It did not hinder the cell's performance and even seemed
> > to keep it stable from interference.
> > I also employed a "D" battery negative only.
> >
> > Shalom,
> >  Â  Rob
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ____________ _________ _________ __
> > From: Nathan <cellery97@ ..>
> > To: joecellfreeenergyde vice@yahoogroups .com
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2009 2:47:22 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Joe Cell Free Energy Device] THE man-made UFO and the CELL â€â€Å" again
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > adrian
> >
> > he said it cancelled out the static discharge
> >
> > the post number is
> > #25805 JCFED
> >
> > nath
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ____________ _________ _________ __
> > From: Adrian <adrian.mutimer@ virgin.net>
> > To: joecellfreeenergyde vice@yahoogroups .com
> > Sent: Wednesday, 8 July, 2009 5:04:32 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Joe Cell Free Energy Device] THE man-made UFO and the CELL â€â€Å" again
> >
> >
> > That's interesting. Did he say why?
> >
> > A--- In joecellfreeenergyde vice@yahoogroups .com, Nathan <cellery97@ ..> wrote:
> > >
> > > rob used a static strap to ground on his conversions
> > >
> > > nath
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ____________ _________ _________ __
> > > From: Adrian <adrian.mutimer@ ...>
> > > To: joecellfreeenergyde vice@yahoogroups .com
> > > Sent: Wednesday, 8 July, 2009 5:16:56 AM
> > > Subject: [Joe Cell Free Energy Device] THE man-made UFO and the CELL â€" again
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Guys, you will know I tend to induce from the UFO to the cell/car, and back again. Well recently I am reminded of something said by several people in the UFO world which is that the man-made UFOs (used to) have a problem, which was that if they got too near the ground they could not get off again. They used insulated platforms to avoid this. Randolph Winters is a source for this and the so are the guys who have written about Nazi saucers [Ever wondered why Adamski's soucers look so "fifties"? His "Venusians" spoke friggin' German! And they had blonf har and blue sodding eyes.)..
> > >
> > > Erhem, anyway, it has to do with the field escaping to ground. That is what it wants to do, it wants to find balance, and the very fastest way to do that is to return to the earth.
> > >
> > > With the car we have the tyres; these components are our way to prevent this "shorting out" â€" wrong term because it calls electrical thinking too vividly, but it is close enough I reckon.
> > >
> > > The implication is that we want no projections on the underside of the car that are near to, or that point to ground, and we want good clearance of the chassis. Big tyres would be good - like a dragster...
> > >
> > > I wonder if a thick polythene sheet taped to the underside would be helpful...Poly can block torsion/orgone. Most likely this would have nasty implications for good running, but you see the general idea. It might also screw the growth of the field in a way I don't know of.
> > >
> > > We want that field to be stable and to enclose the cell using the car's shell. I think that field would work a hell of a lot better of the car was flat and round and smooth - you know, like a flying saucer is...It is this idea of the cell being surrounded with itself. The frame of the car can do this, poorly I reckon, what with all those silly holes and wing mirrors and what have you, but I worry about whether it will do so when it is wet, when the air is humid (about 90% of the time here!) and maybe the shells of our cars are of the wrong electrical polarity too...The thing is I don't really know why I think this last bit.. There is nothing at all behind it, not even a half thought out analogue from the UFO...
> > >
> > > Argueing against all this is that in at least one case Alex's conversions would only work if he was touching the car. And Alex would have made a pathway to earth, even if he was wearing thick soles, unless he was inside at the time of course...don' t know.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Adrian
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
> > > Access Yahoo!7 Mail on your mobile. Anytime. Anywhere.
> > > Show me how: http://au.mobile.. yahoo.com/ mail
> > >
> >
> >
> > ____________ _________ _________ __
> > Access Yahoo!7 Mail on your mobile.. Anytime. Anywhere. Show me how.
> >
>