Well, let's say you are using some third-party plugin to implement your javascript code interaction with the website. For easier understanding left pick a...
2597
Douglas Crockford
douglascrock...
Sep 16, 2011 8:12 pm
... No. Why do you want to insert crappy code into your code?...
2596
Marcos Zanona
marcos.zanona
Sep 11, 2011 5:01 pm
Hello I was wondering if it is possible to escape/disable jslint validation for a specific function inside a file like: function off() { /*jslint off*/ ... } ...
2595
Kent Davidson
kentdavidson
Sep 6, 2011 7:31 pm
Sorry for misinterpreting your post. I see the issue. Is it possible to simply pre-process the legacy JavaScript before plugging it through JSLint as was...
2594
ScottJ
scottj75074
Sep 6, 2011 6:41 pm
I keep a local copy of jslint too (as part of jslint_on_rails) but that doesn't solve the problem here. The issue is that one change to jslint has caused all...
2593
Douglas Crockford
douglascrock...
Sep 6, 2011 5:35 pm
Silicon Valley Codecamp is a free software development conference held at Foothill College in Los Altos, California. I will be presenting there again this...
2592
Rob Richardson
erobrich@...
Sep 6, 2011 3:45 am
Kent, We do this too, but don't run it inside Selenium inside a browser. Rather we run JSLint inside cscript.exe or V8 or rhino or JScript. It makes tests ...
2591
Kent Davidson
kentdavidson
Sep 5, 2011 5:15 pm
Scott, What we do at my company is pull down versions of the jslint code and site and then host it internally on test web servers (e.g....
2590
ScottJ
scottj75074
Sep 3, 2011 6:32 am
[I realize I'm late to the discussion, and I apologize if I'm reopening old wounds.] Referring to the change on June 9 that inverted the semantics of many of...
2589
Douglas Crockford
douglascrock...
Sep 2, 2011 1:39 pm
... No. Declare all vars at the top of the function to avoid hoisting confusions. This is particularly import with the for statement because of the capture of...
2588
maddinr92
Sep 2, 2011 1:33 pm
First, thank you for your great validation tool. Demo-JavaScript: var test = function () { var letsHaveSomeFun = {}; for (var entry in letsHaveSomeFun) { ...
2587
sandyhead25
Aug 25, 2011 3:57 pm
Actually what you are describing is not minification. It is obfuscation, which is different. YUI can do both. You are also confusing minification in markup...
2586
Ben White
benxwhite
Aug 25, 2011 3:36 pm
I think he meant to type this for object detection. typeof o === 'object' && !!o Ben ... said? ... called Object.keys, which produces an array of the...
2585
Jakob Kruse
thekrucible
Aug 25, 2011 3:30 pm
var o = {}; ... typeof o === 'object' && !o ... Doesn't seem like a very good object detection test? What should it have said? /Jakob _____ From: Douglas...
2584
Douglas Crockford
douglascrock...
Aug 25, 2011 3:10 pm
... No. Object(o) was not created for that purpose. That code is depending on an edge case. Avoid the edges. Use this instead: typeof o === 'object' && !o ...
2583
Chris
altearius
Aug 25, 2011 2:41 pm
Hello, JavaScript 1.8.5 introduces a new method of the Object constructor called Object.keys, which produces an array of the enumerable properties of a given...
2582
paulcrowder1979
Aug 24, 2011 1:29 pm
I've avoided putting the spacing in the string itself since it wouldn't get minified out. As for the concatenation cost, remember that I use YUI Compressor to...
2581
Satyam
satyamutsa
Aug 24, 2011 6:51 am
You can also place the spaces doing the indentation within the string: ....'....<whatever>;' + instead of: ........'<whatever>' + So much concatenating IS...
2579
paulcrowder1979
Aug 23, 2011 9:03 pm
I wasn't aware of the block-level option, so thanks for pointing that out. I'll just move the code that builds the HTML into its own function and specify the...
2578
Phil
druid_rpg
Aug 23, 2011 8:32 pm
... [ .. snip .. snip .. ] ... JSLint supports 'scoped' control comments. I *assume* you either do not have a /*jslint ... */ comment in your code, or it at...
2577
cheesox
Aug 23, 2011 8:30 pm
DC - Thanks for your ongoing efforts maintaining jslint. There's a conflict between the options specified in the call to JSLINT(), and the options specified in...
2576
William Chapman
jeddahbill
Aug 23, 2011 7:32 pm
Would like to voice strong support for paulcrowder1979's suggestion. I feel that JSLint should be quite liberal when evaluating indentation of any literal...
2575
paulcrowder1979
Aug 23, 2011 7:13 pm
I'm generally a fan of the whitespace rules that JSLint enforces, but there's on exception I'd like to see implemented. When I build an HTML string in...
2574
Douglas Crockford
douglascrock...
Aug 22, 2011 10:00 pm
... JSLint expects that the induction variable is local to the function containing the loop....
2573
pierremartineau
Aug 22, 2011 7:01 pm
... I believe this is a similar problem: with these options: /*jslint es5: true, indent: 2 */ JSLint objects: "Bad for in variable 'a'." on this code: var a, b...
2572
Marcos Zanona
marcos.zanona
Aug 17, 2011 8:49 am
Actually if you work with even listeners it is quite easy to understand why `this` isn't accepted in all cases: ### In the following case `this` is accepted...
2571
Phil
druid_rpg
Aug 17, 2011 3:16 am
... Ah! Thanks. Following through the rest of that thread, the solution is simple [for my case anyway]. Just change the function definitions from function...
2570
Douglas Crockford
douglascrock...
Aug 16, 2011 4:45 pm
... /*jslint*/ directives are treated as statements because they respect block scope. Because they respect block scope, your second directive is useless and...
2569
Douglas Crockford
douglascrock...
Aug 16, 2011 4:39 pm
... Thanks. Please try it now....
2568
benxwhite
Aug 16, 2011 3:20 pm
var getGroupId = function (group) { /*jslint regexp:true*/ return group.name.replace(/<.+?>|\W/g, '').toLowerCase(); /*jslint regexp:false*/ }; This throws an...
