Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
json-rpc
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
New maintainer needed!   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #599 of 635 |
Re: [json-rpc] New maintainer needed!

Here's a list of action items that I see as being pending:
  1. Determine who will be the discussion group's maintainer (group owner); Jan-Klass was referring to this current Yahoo Group, but the consensus seems to be that we should move to Google Groups.
  2. Determine how we shall handle the hosting of json-rpc.org. I assume that Jan-Klass won't indefinitely continue hosting json-rpc.org, so we'll need to decide on where to host. Matthew has expressed willingness to provide funds.
  3. Discuss how to delegate SVN privileges and hosting access, and who administers the issue tracker and the wiki.
  4. Discuss the current website. Do we want to continue using Trac? Does the website need to be restructured or redesigned? Ensure that the 1.0 spec is archived and kept available (Matthew).
  5. Begin to discuss where we are with JSON-RPC 1.1, and what improvements need to be made for it to move to the next draft stage.
Thus far, the following people have expressed interest in being part of the JSON-RPC committee:
  1. Weston Ruter <westonruter@...>
  2. Matthew Morley < mmorley@...>
  3. Lorenzo Pastrana < pastrana@...>
  4. (?) Jeffrey Damick <jeffreydamick@...>
I propose that in a week or two, after everyone has been given a chance to express their commitment to JSON-RPC, that we form a committee consisting of the committed persons. Then we can discuss together the action items above and any others which are raised over the next weeks.

Weston

Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:56 pm

westonmr
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #599 of 635 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Hello all, As many have seen over the past two years my involvement with JSON-RPC have almost come to a stop. I am sorry to let everyone down. With a fulltime...
Jan-Klaas Kollhof
keyjaque
Offline Send Email
Aug 19, 2007
10:04 am

Jan-Klass: I would very much like to help take over maintaining the discussion and development of JSON-RPC. I have just released new JSON-RPC client and server...
Weston Ruter
westonmr
Offline Send Email
Aug 19, 2007
10:38 am

Mycompany also has several implementations of the json-rpc 1.1WD in java and ruby which have been in a production environment for about 10 months..So I would...
Jeffrey Damick
jeffreydamick
Offline Send Email
Aug 19, 2007
2:04 pm

I agree, Jeffery. No single individual should have complete control of maintaining the specification or moderating the discussion. A committee should be formed...
Weston Ruter
westonmr
Offline Send Email
Aug 19, 2007
2:12 pm

Agreed. In particular I would like to see that the 1.0 spec is archived and kept available, for those of us who have issues with the 1.1WD in it's current ...
Matthew Morley
wickedlogik
Offline Send Email
Aug 20, 2007
6:24 am

Hi, Agreed! My company is developing solutions for tourism using JSON-RPC too, and would be interested in participating to the committee. Before the committee...
Lorenzo Pastrana
kardamone
Offline Send Email
Aug 21, 2007
5:20 pm

Here's a list of action items that I see as being pending: 1. Determine who will be the discussion group's maintainer (group owner); Jan-Klass was referring to...
Weston Ruter
westonmr
Offline Send Email
Aug 23, 2007
4:56 pm

... In case hosting is still needed, i could provide a virtual server for this too. ... Count me in as well. Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Regards, Arne Blankerts ...
Arne Blankerts
theseer_netp...
Offline Send Email
Aug 23, 2007
5:17 pm

Yes, count me in as well. For 2,3,4 - If you want to move to google groups (fine with me), you know code.google.com also has wiki, issue tracking, svn, etc....
Jeffrey Damick
jeffreydamick
Offline Send Email
Aug 23, 2007
8:45 pm

Google groups is fine with me also. -- Matthew P. C. Morley MPCM Technologies Inc....
Matthew Morley
wickedlogik
Offline Send Email
Aug 23, 2007
9:01 pm

Does anyone object to moving over to Google Groups? If not I can create a new Google Group for JSON-RPC tomorrow and we can begin discussing matters there. We...
Weston Ruter
westonmr
Offline Send Email
Aug 24, 2007
1:16 am

My feeling about http://code.google.com is that the purpose there is to promote Google's own public APIs and some Google related stuff ... Not really an...
Lorenzo Pastrana
kardamone
Offline Send Email
Aug 24, 2007
11:37 am

I did not get the same feeling. Although a spec might not fit by itself, a sample code implementation that sticks to the specs would be a worthwhile addition....
Matthew Morley
wickedlogik
Offline Send Email
Aug 24, 2007
4:35 pm

Wow, lot's of action. I have a few things; I do think google groups hosting is a bit dangerous for an open project. Google has shown itself to be very good...
Mikeal Rogers
mikeal@...
Send Email
Sep 3, 2007
5:43 am

... Agreed, but mainly about files/svn etc.. I guess google is ok for hosting the mailing list, and might even be a good point regarding 'publicity', archives...
pastrana@...
kardamone
Offline Send Email
Sep 4, 2007
9:54 am

Hi all, I have been offline for a week. Wow, lots of discussion going on. Regarding the hosting, I will keep it up and running as long as it takes. No rush...
Jan-Klaas Kollhof
keyjaque
Offline Send Email
Aug 28, 2007
5:07 pm

I'll love to be part of this, I'm using json-rpc as a side project, but I'm planning on using it a lot more. As for the trac/svn I got several patches I'll...
Jorge Vargas
elpargochess
Offline Send Email
Aug 28, 2007
10:33 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help