Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

json-rpc

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

  • Members: 191
  • Category: Protocols
  • Founded: Mar 13, 2004
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Messages

Advanced
Messages Help
Messages 314 - 344 of 636   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand Author Sort by Date ^
314 Jim Washington
jimcburg Send Email
Sep 6, 2006
9:22 pm
I promised a few quibbles. GET seems troublesome. There seems no way in WD1.1 to distinguish a GET that wants a JSON response from a GET that wants a JSON-RPC...
315 Jim Washington
jimcburg Send Email
Sep 6, 2006
9:59 pm
10.1 Service Procedure Description params is optional. OK But if params is not provided, the text specifies that "the procedure does not expect any...
316 Atif Aziz
azizatif Send Email
Sep 6, 2006
10:13 pm
I wonder if in that case the right solution wouldn't be to simply send back the data from the "result" member of the Procedure Return Object (and the "error"...
317 Atif Aziz
azizatif Send Email
Sep 6, 2006
10:58 pm
I just realized a problem with what I proposed earlier. FWIW, JSON text cannot be composed of a single String, Number, Boolean or Null value. It must be either...
318 Balazs Ree
ree@... Send Email
Sep 7, 2006
5:51 am
... I would like to back up Jim's problem statement. When a request arrives to the server, it must be possible to decide if we have a JSON-RPC request or not...
319 Atif Aziz
azizatif Send Email
Sep 7, 2006
8:36 am
Sections 6.6 and 6.6.1 are probably more relevant for this discussion because that's what allows your case of optional versus required parameters to pass. I...
320 Jim Washington
jimcburg Send Email
Sep 7, 2006
12:36 pm
Atif, Thank you for the response. I was just thinking in terms of how the data is likely to be used. "system.describe" is a MUST for a conforming JSON-RPC...
321 Atif Aziz
azizatif Send Email
Sep 7, 2006
5:20 pm
Point taken, Jim. I agree that there may be room for misunderstanding. I'll see what I can do to improve the wording or discussion around that topic. Perhaps a...
322 Atif Aziz
azizatif Send Email
Sep 10, 2006
10:37 am
... 1.1 WD only specifies "application/json" as an Accept parameter in the header to distinguish this from any other GET. Would "application/json-rpc" be a...
323 Balazs Ree
ree@... Send Email
Sep 11, 2006
12:05 pm
Hi Atif, ... It *is* also about content negotiation. If a client requires a json-rpc response it won't accept a non-json-rpc response and vice versa. But I can...
324 Wilfred Nilsen
wilfrednilsen Send Email
Sep 13, 2006
8:53 pm
I found the following comment in the new draft: Atif Aziz: Strictly disallow the use of cookies. Disallowing cookies will make it impossible to use JSON-RPC...
325 Matt
WickedLogic@... Send Email
Sep 14, 2006
2:39 am
... Why not just leave this outside of the spec, instead of `must`? I definitely see lots of places where sessions would to be started outside of the rpc call...
326 Atif Aziz
azizatif Send Email
Sep 14, 2006
10:08 am
Matt + Wilfred, I wouldn't that note to heart. It was put in there to provoke some reaction and I have that reaction now. :) I'll be removing it moving forward...
327 Jim Washington
jimcburg Send Email
Sep 14, 2006
1:16 pm
... Hi, Atif Nice to hear! I was wondering about that comment as well. Do you see an important distinction between a JSON-RPC "Service" and JSON-RPC as a...
328 Matt
WickedLogic@... Send Email
Sep 14, 2006
2:18 pm
Jim, Perhaps I'm missing a finer point here. If a json-rpc service is listening, it either gathers what it needs from the environmental variables just like the...
329 Matt
WickedLogic@... Send Email
Sep 14, 2006
2:33 pm
I agree with what you are saying, because ideally the service should function with all of it's requirements being fulfilled in the request channel and not rely...
330 Jim Washington
jimcburg Send Email
Sep 14, 2006
2:42 pm
... That would be nice, except, From 6.3.1 in the WD, "The client MUST NOT use the JSON syntax for the parameter values." and "It is specifically not possible...
331 Matt
WickedLogic@... Send Email
Sep 14, 2006
3:51 pm
On 9/14/06, Jim Washington <jwashin@...> wrote: That would be nice, except, ... Would someone be willing to go over the reasons behind not being able to...
332 Andreas Hofmeister
andi@... Send Email
Sep 15, 2006
3:44 pm
Hi, it seems the current WD does not allow the specification of the structure of complex data types as parameter or result, basically because there is no way...
333 Atif Aziz
azizatif Send Email
Sep 17, 2006
6:10 pm
Hi Balazs, It's really a hard problem to solve entirely through Content-Type anyhow. The spec suggests "application/json" because that is the best-fit...
334 Atif Aziz
azizatif Send Email
Sep 18, 2006
6:24 am
Hi Jim, Isn't this the same problem as trying to disambiguate a JSON-RPC request from other types so that it could be handled off the same end-point? If so,...
335 Jim Washington
jimcburg Send Email
Sep 18, 2006
2:06 pm
... Hi, Atif Yes. Thanks for the response. ... Yes. That is what we are aiming for as well. As I read the WD a bit closer, I am now understanding it to say...
336 Atif Aziz
azizatif Send Email
Sep 19, 2006
7:33 am
... Am I to understand from that, that a server implementation would not necessarily be nonconforming if it did not go to great lengths to support JSON-RPC GET...
337 Atif Aziz
azizatif Send Email
Sep 19, 2006
8:16 am
... Would someone be willing to go over the reasons behind not being able to pass a json-rpc request in json syntax as a `request object`? It seems somewhat...
338 Atif Aziz
azizatif Send Email
Sep 19, 2006
8:59 am
Andread, I did consider this, but unfortunately, it seemed that baking anything short of an entire schema language for JSON would be a kludge and a problem...
339 Matt
WickedLogic@... Send Email
Sep 19, 2006
2:23 pm
Atif, Thank you for the reply. I completely understand your points, it just caught me off guard that the option to pass a raw json-rpc request object was...
340 Atif Aziz
azizatif Send Email
Sep 21, 2006
4:28 pm
Hi Matt, ... Even if it seems simple from client/server implementation perspective, the problem is that it's not very GET-proper. Moreover, if the spec allows...
342 Matt
WickedLogic@... Send Email
Sep 22, 2006
11:41 am
Atif, Thank you for the reply. Seemingly as I am the only one concerned I'll drop the topic. ; ) (Seems like the sort of thing best discussed over a cup of...
343 Wilfred Nilsen
wilfrednilsen Send Email
Sep 27, 2006
10:32 pm
I am currently implementing JSON-RPC server/client and I have decided not to follow some of the requirements from the specification. I am one of the developers...
344 Matt
WickedLogic@... Send Email
Sep 28, 2006
3:14 pm
... Why exactly would this be difficult? ... Would you mind pointing out the reference in the working draft? (On a separate note, in October I'll be at...
Messages 314 - 344 of 636   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help