Hi all, just some thoughts that sprung up thinking of JSON-RPC over HTTP GET All browsers implement the HTTPRequest object with the same-domain policy. I.e. a...
405
Mikeal Rogers
mikeal@...
Dec 4, 2006 7:10 pm
This is a very simple question, what are the proper content-type headers for json-rpc requests and responses over HTTP. The python implementation seems to use...
406
Jim Washington
jimcburg
Dec 4, 2006 7:28 pm
... Since JSON-RPC is JSON, the correct content-type should be 'application/json'. (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4627.txt) In practice, it does not matter too...
407
Gaetano Giunta
gaetanogiunt...
Dec 14, 2006 5:31 pm
I have developed a graphical editor of json / xmlrpc values. It is 100% javascript, based on the yui library (and on a work-in-progress port of the phpxmlrpc...
408
xypher_01
Dec 16, 2006 1:44 am
On the topic of Parity - is there any sort of enumeration to it (like 0== No parity, 1==Some, 10==100% totally awesomely paritous (is that a word? :) Or, is it...
409
r.koebler
Dec 16, 2006 6:02 pm
hi, I read the JSON-RPC 1.0 specification and liked it, because it is lightweight and simple. The only thing that was missing were "named arguments". Then I...
410
infosock2000
Dec 19, 2006 10:26 pm
Is there any idea to standarize a way to send multiple call methods in just one request? It would be great for performance to do that And what about mixing...
412
Mikeal Rogers
mikeal@...
Jan 3, 2007 7:39 am
I wrote some generally useful code recently which i figured I should share. http://windmill.osafoundation.org/trac/browser/windmill/trunk/ ...
413
Bob Gailer
ramrom313
Jan 3, 2007 7:34 pm
... I appreciate your sharing this code. Unfortunately I have no idea what to do with it or how to install it. Could you provide a little guidance? Is it...
414
Mikeal Rogers
mikeal@...
Jan 3, 2007 9:08 pm
... The dispatcher is the underlying object for running any python method over json-rpc. You send it methods to be added for dispatch, or you can send it a...
415
roamingbecki
Jan 4, 2007 10:12 am
... I'm glad to read this. JSON-RPC (1.0) currently proves to be the best solution for the communication between our new and legacy embedded devices (which...
416
Matthew Morley
wickedlogik
Jan 4, 2007 4:39 pm
I have not seem much posting recently around the WD1.1. There are some of us that have issues with different sections, but I would like to see WD1.1 moved...
418
Mikeal Rogers
mikeal@...
Jan 7, 2007 12:59 am
... I personally think it's about time to put json-rpc on the track to an IETF RFC. Next week I'll be seeing Lisa Dusseault, the current application area ...
419
dscplcomau
Jan 8, 2007 10:53 am
... I'd probably not be regarded as really being a part of the json-rpc community so my opinion may be seen as irrelevant, but I would disagree with trying to...
420
Matthew Morley
wickedlogik
Jan 8, 2007 12:33 pm
*It requires that the request package be an array of request objects with unique id. For single requests, per the wd1.1 the id would be optional To clarify, if...
421
Matthew Morley
wickedlogik
Jan 8, 2007 12:40 pm
I am in agreement with Graham, pushing to RFC is not the solution to issues in the WD 1.1 . I would rather not step on other's work, but I'm concerned that...
422
Mikeal Rogers
mikeal@...
Jan 8, 2007 5:22 pm
... Part of the RFC process is to change the language in the specification. Looking at the spec now, there is very little should and must or suggested type...
423
Mikeal Rogers
mikeal@...
Jan 8, 2007 5:54 pm
... One of the things I hoped would happen when suggesting this course of action would be to see what people thought of the current working draft and bring...
424
Atif Aziz
azizatif
Jan 9, 2007 12:31 am
I think it's not as bad as it sounds. Looking back at the last year, the majority of the discussion in this group has centered around WD 1.1, from feedback...
425
Atif Aziz
azizatif
Jan 9, 2007 12:37 am
The only real unresolved issue I see is the multiple request in a single incoming request package. Matt, I'm sorry if you feel this has not been addressed. I...
426
json-rpc@yahoogroups....
Jan 9, 2007 12:58 am
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the json-rpc group: Is JSON-RPC 1.1 (Working Draft 7 August 2006) headed in the right direction? In...
427
Atif Aziz
azizatif
Jan 9, 2007 1:00 am
I'm afraid that many important points and concerns are getting lost in threads and discussions. There is the danger that we'll get some good traffic for...
428
Atif Aziz
azizatif
Jan 9, 2007 1:07 am
Although self description of a system is important, I really do see it as optional albeit socially important for public facing servers. Just a quick question...
429
json-rpc@yahoogroups....
Jan 9, 2007 7:09 am
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the json-rpc group: Section 6.2.1 of JSON-RPC 1.1 (WD Aug 07, 2006) permits positional and named...
430
Atif Aziz
azizatif
Jan 9, 2007 8:08 am
... - 7.4. Error Object as noted, the error-codes are missing (or: are all 000). maybe we could use the same error-codes as some other RPCs, i.e. as XMLRPC? <<...
431
Atif Aziz
azizatif
Jan 9, 2007 8:08 am
I've added another one as well to see how successfully we can collect consensus on a point raised by Roland in message #409 [1]: ...
432
dscplcomau
Jan 9, 2007 11:02 am
Distinct from mixing named and positional in one call, I'd also question the requirement for a service implemented using positional parameters to still be able...
433
alberttobiasmoth
alberttobias...
Jan 9, 2007 11:28 pm
Hi I'd like to make some (increasingly intrusive) suggestions. Why not move the procedure name into the URI? ... There are several reasons for this suggestion....
434
Kevin Prichard
kevin3prichard
Jan 10, 2007 2:05 am
... The given poll is a bit simple - there are too many issues to say 1.1 good or bad. What I'd really rather see is a wiki (as you mentioned) where people...
435
Atif Aziz
azizatif
Jan 10, 2007 8:53 pm
Sorry, but this complicates things rather than making them simpler! Yes, it help someone implementing the server, but think about the scenario where a...
