hi, I like JSON-RPC 1.0: it's nice and simple. And its *simplicity* is its major advantage to all other rpc-systems. The JSON-RPC 1.1WD then added some very...
516
Jim Washington
jimcburg
Apr 3, 2007 1:41 pm
... What is wrong with mixed named and positional parameters? def myFunc(param1,param2,debug=False,verbose=1): [...some cool code...] return result I see that...
517
Gaetano Giunta
gaetanogiunt...
Apr 4, 2007 9:31 am
... Sorry, imho it is a confusing feature in general, and it is not implemented consistently across languages / environments myfunc('hello', firstparam =...
518
Jim Washington
jimcburg
Apr 4, 2007 11:09 am
... I know that in python, these issues are handled as exceptions and/or syntax errors. This mixed model is not confusing in python. The convention is that...
520
r.koebler@...
r.koebler
Apr 7, 2007 5:27 pm
hi, ... it's complicated and not really useful. and it adds new errors. ... I hope you don't really use "param1" and "param2" as parameter-names... ... that's...
521
r.koebler@...
r.koebler
Apr 8, 2007 12:35 am
... and so, "mixed and positional parameters" add new error-cases which do not exist without them, and which are probably confusing for some programmers/users....
522
r.koebler@...
r.koebler
Apr 9, 2007 4:09 pm
hi again, (answering myself ;)) ... but unfortunately, to be able to make this translation, the client would have to know the methods and its parameter-names....
529
r.koebler
May 2, 2007 9:33 pm
hi, I now updated my 1.1WD suggestion/specification. I especially added "kwparams"; and multicall. see: http://84.16.237.14/jsonrpc/ Any comments are greatly...
531
jimcburg
May 6, 2007 3:30 am
... Hi, Roland This is an improvement, IMHO. I'm guessing that you are just checking whether people are actually reading the thing, but you have "params"...
532
Matthew Morley
wickedlogik
May 6, 2007 10:29 am
Got a vote from me also! I appreciate the efforts, this as a good step forward from the 1.0 spec. -- Matthew P. C. Morley...
533
r.koebler@...
r.koebler
May 6, 2007 11:33 am
... oh, thanks. it's corrected now. ... yes, they are optional. ... thanks :). regards, Roland...
534
Jeffrey Damick
jeffreydamick
May 7, 2007 1:26 pm
So the only bad thing is that by adding kwparams and removing the named arguments capability from params is that it is a pretty big change if you've already...
535
Stephen M. McKamey
stephen.mckamey
May 7, 2007 3:47 pm
I also have JSON-RPC 1.1 working and it works great. kwparams would be a breaking change (not to mention I think "kwparams"; is an inelegant identifier that...
536
json-rpc@yahoogroups....
May 7, 2007 5:09 pm
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the json-rpc group: Do we need mixed named and positional parameters? (this refers to the "suggestion...
537
r.koebler@...
r.koebler
May 7, 2007 5:13 pm
... if you know a better name: tell me. ... ok. but this would mean that you cannot mix named and positional parameters. that would be ok for me, and I already...
538
jonleemok3
May 8, 2007 2:24 pm
Hello, I noticed that the specification has not yet specified error codes. A previous msg suggested using error codes found in XML-RPC implementations. Can...
539
Mikeal Rogers
mikeal@...
May 9, 2007 4:51 pm
Welcome to the world of implementing draft specifications :) It's a risk you take. In my opinion nobody should worry about breaking draft implementations...
545
Matt Hancher
matthewhancher
May 18, 2007 6:35 pm
Hi all, I am a newcomer to the JSON-RPC 1.1 draft process. First, Is anything actually happening here? I have seen no comments from the original draft authors...
548
r.koebler
May 21, 2007 10:00 am
hi, ... I tried this, and created an improved working-draft (some months ago), which you can find here: http://84.16.237.14/jsonrpc/ the next steps (for me)...
550
JOrge Vargas
elpargochess
May 30, 2007 11:26 pm
Hi I'm interested in the feature of server-to-client messages, specified on the spec, but I can't find it's implementation on the python code, is anyone...
551
konstantin_yegupov
konstantin_y...
Jun 1, 2007 12:22 pm
1.1 spec STILL isn't complete, and is too complex, in my opinion. An we NEED it finished, to make it enterprise-ready and beat the shit out of immeasurably...
552
Jorge Vargas
elpargochess
Jun 1, 2007 7:48 pm
Hi the bug tracker didn't let me post as guest/guest. there is a python error with the %-substitution. I believe what you wanted is to be able to call module...
553
Jan-Klaas Kollhof
keyjaque
Jun 3, 2007 10:18 pm
Hey, thanks for the fix, it is checked in now. just checked trac, it did let me log in as guest/guest and it let me create a ticket (#14). Not sure why it did...
554
Jorge Vargas
elpargochess
Jun 4, 2007 4:20 pm
hi Jan. about trac it's probably the stupid proxy here at my office for someone reason noone knows how to configure it "right"..... anyway where you able to...
557
Mikeal Rogers
mikeal@...
Jun 5, 2007 11:54 pm
I'm in 100% agreement with 1, the spec not being finished a big problem, who is responsible for editing the spec? who are the stake holders here and can we...
558
Mikeal Rogers
mikeal@...
Jun 6, 2007 12:18 am
WSGI ( http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0333/ ) is increasingly popular among the python web community. I wrote a jsonrpc "application" that dispatches...
559
Jan-Klaas Kollhof
keyjaque
Jun 6, 2007 11:13 am
Hey, I did have a quick look at the other mails, just have not put it in the code yet. Thanks ... where you...
560
Jan-Klaas Kollhof
keyjaque
Jun 6, 2007 11:27 am
Hey, ... I, Jan-Klaas Kollhof, created the 1.0 specs. Atif has been the driving force behind the 1.1 specs. Unfortunately, I have had little time in the past...
561
jaimewyant
Jun 6, 2007 7:53 pm
Hi all. I've found a minor bug when using the modpywrapper. If you request a methodthat does not exist, then ModPyServiceHandler raises a ...
562
r.koebler
Jun 6, 2007 9:19 pm
hi, ... did you read http://84.16.237.14/jsonrpc/ ? ... hmm, I don't think so. in terms of RPC, what would i.e. a string mean? that it's the only parameter to...
