... Quick question: home page suggests that one benefit of the library is high performance. How is this determined, i.e. how has it been tested, and against...
It's base on some internal testing and testing of an independent author in some complex scenarios. The result show that the encoding of JSON.simple is as...
... Thank you for quick answer! Would it be maybe possible to publish results of these internal tests? And/or maybe just cut'n paste your explanation -- it...
It will be great if you can add JSON.simple (latest version 1.0.2) in your test suite and let me know the results. I'll publish the testing source codes and...
... Updated. Thanks. ... Would you like to propose something? The Python community was able to converge on a single library. The Java community has not yet, as...
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Douglas Crockford ... Thank you. ... I think convergence will happen via sort of natural selection over time... although it...
The JSON.stringify function builds a JSON text using the own properties of the objects it is given. If you want the text to also include the inherited...
Please check out my new C++ JSON interface library at: http://cajun-jsonapi.sourceforge.net/ What makes it better than the others already available? A major...
Does this interface allow the JSON data to be streamed in? Thanks, Mark P6R, Inc On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:26:31 -0000 ... Mark Joseph, Ph.D. President and...
JSON.simple introduces a simplified and stoppable SAX-like content handler to process JSON text stream. Please take a look if you are interested in it: ...
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the json group. File :...
json@yahoogroups.com
Feb 4, 2009 6:41 am
1199
... Yes it does. In fact, the library's built-in input/output capability is based on the standard istream & ostream classes, so any C++ stream-based ...
... If you are interested in application code controlling parsing, why not just use Stax(-like) pull interface? Code example given would be quite a bit simpler...
Well, if I am right, the parser in your example is essentially a lexer, with slightly higher abstraction. It's true that it's convenient to control in simple...
... Not really. You may want to read a bit on Stax API for Java: I assume you are familiar with SAX API. Both operate at roughly same level of abstraction, and...
... I did go through JSR 173 before comparing. I mean, the StAX parser in your example is similar to a lexer such as org.json.simple.parser.Yylex: Yylex lexer...
... Ah ok. Maybe I misread your comment: if you meant it's lower level of abstraction than a tree model, yes. I meant to say that SAX(-like) API is at similar...
For those who might be interested, I have started new a Google group/mailing list for the continued development of a language/syntax for JSON querying: ...
Hi Kris! I think this is a good group to have. :) One quick question: I was wondering about naming of the effort. To me, "Path" and "Query" imply somewhat...
... Yes, it's convenient. But I think it may result in a call stack based processor instead of a heap based one, right? The former will cause stack overflow...
I was reading over the StAX specification and BEA provides licenses to the API, but that license prevents sublicenses. This means I as a vendor cannot provide...
... I don't see why you would need a license to implement an API. Generally licensing governs usage of API itself, distributing it, modifying etc. None of...
... Yes, if your document has nesting level of about million or so. :-D So I don't think that is a practical concern. If it happens to be, then one can...
Ah I am sorry I was not clear we provide the JSON and XML tools to C++ users not Java. http://www.p6r.com/articles/2008/05/22/a-sax-like-parser-for-json/ On...
... Ok that explains it. I shouldn't have assume it's for Java either. And it is true that for products that cover both xml and json, it is advantageous to use...
... This question may have been asked previously but a quick search didn't turn up anything. Why does JSONRequest only support GET/POST and propose a new...
... I am not a REST expert, but isn't PUT used to store given payload (in this case, request in form of Json), and DELETE just ignore payload? Meaning that...