... True. It would seem, at least to me, that this is one of those nuanced points that either a) Has not been given the proper consideration by Unicode...
I had the normalization question while writing json-stream in Ruby as well. I decided the parser shouldn't do Unicode normalization for the following reasons: ...
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:09 PM, johne_ganz <john.engelhart@...> wrote: ... This is true statement, although the more practical question seems to be what...
... Not according to RFC 4627 it isn't. Section 3, Encoding, "JSON text SHALL be encoded in Unicode.", where SHALL is interpreted via RFC 2119 (i.e., SHALL is...
... For JSON's purpose, Unicode is just a set of code points. It gives some, such as { and }, special meaning. But in strings, everything should simply be...
... Not if it's Unicode. It is a common misconception that "Unicode" is just a set of code points, like say ASCII or EBCDIC. It is not. With ASCII, you can...
A receiver can do what it chooses to with the character codes it receives. If it wants to delete them or reject them, that is its business. But a JSON channel...
In RFC 4627, Section 3 Encoding, it states: "JSON text SHALL be encoded in Unicode. The default encoding is UTF-8." Unicode is defined as: The Unicode...
Since this is a group dedicated to JSON, I just thought I'd post a note about yet another Objective-C serializer / deserializer: JSONKit, available at...
... That would be very useful! I know it might be bit of work, given differing APIs and all.. but then again, it should be beneficial for authors of other...
Well there is a benchmark included in the source, but it's mostly for my own purposes of comparing upgrade versions against the previous version. I think ill...
... I suspect many users would like to see comparisons. Maybe blog about it or such (and include test code), or send a link if already published? I don't doubt...
If there is a standard JSON benchmark that would be nice. I've only compared it to wxJSON, cJSON, and a few others. "People have always been impressed by the...
... Yes, one would be very useful. I know there are couple for Java (general purpose ones that can also use JSON; and specific ones), but haven't seen many for...
TS> I have noticed that at least half of all JSON projects claim to be TS> faster than anyone else, so measurements could also clear up the TS> situation and...
If you'd prefer a really slow JSON parser, check out https://github.com/dgraham/json-stream. It's about 20x slower than the Ruby json gem, but it's quite...
Interesting. One thing I noticed from the project page is that there are big claims on performance, but it seems to lack links to actual measurements? I was...
Hello all, I just wanted to mention that a while ago I changed the name from libJSON to libjson, would you mind reflecting that on json.org? I added a ton of...
... Hopefully not... software is software... there's always more than one way to skin the proverbial cat... "there can be only one" is reminiscent of...
I'm working on documenting my own API (JSON, JSON-RPCish), and it's a lot of work. I just keep reminding myself how I'd like to read it. Dennis Gearon ...
... True. That also contributes to feeling of "but how is this different". Maybe there are strengths, but if finding those requires reading sources, yeah,...
If there was anything that bugs ME, is incomplete documentation and 'just read the code' type of libraries. Dennis Gearon ________________________________ ...
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Douglas Crockford ... Probably not to the degree that there'd be just one. From the list I think just maybe half a dozen are...
... I would say that that could happen in only a few ways: 1) If someone shepherded a particular library through the JCP, a clunky and bureaucratic process...
