Hello, I want to execute some actions on @After only if the @Test has failed. Is there a function to know it a test has failed? thanks, pura vida. -- Leo...
22141
Ilja Preuß
ipreussde
Dec 7, 2009 11:27 am
What's motivating you to use JUnit? Wouldn't it be better to write your tests in COBOL? 2009/12/6 conectme366 <conectme366@...> ... [Non-text portions of...
22142
David Saff
dsaff
Dec 7, 2009 1:55 pm
Although, thanks for the impetus to learn something new to me: http://sites.google.com/site/cobolunit/ David Saff...
22143
David Saff
dsaff
Dec 7, 2009 1:57 pm
Leo, If you can use 4.7 or after, you're better off using a TestWatchman: http://kentbeck.github.com/junit/javadoc/4.8/org/junit/rules/TestWatchman.html Will...
22144
Leo Arias
leo_ariasf
Dec 7, 2009 3:41 pm
... I think so :) Let me try to implement it that way. thanks David. -- Leo Arias. ¡paz y baile! http://elopio.net...
22145
Joe Schmetzer
copabella
Dec 7, 2009 8:19 pm
Whoa! That's new! Thanks for pointing that out. I was searching high and low for something like COBOLUnit about 6 months ago, and came up with nothing. We had...
22146
Markus
realmacmark
Dec 7, 2009 11:12 pm
I experience exactly the same problem with JUnit 4.8: Annotating the testing class with @Category(...) has no effect, but annotating its methods with...
22147
conectme366
Dec 8, 2009 6:17 am
Ilja, thanks for your reply , yes we normally do write in cobol,we have new proj in pipeline in which we are asked for this.So i have posted for help....
22148
conectme366
Dec 8, 2009 6:17 am
Thanks a lot David. Rocky....
22149
David Saff
dsaff
Dec 8, 2009 3:37 pm
JUnit 4.8.1 has been released, fixing major bugs in the documentation and implementation of categories. Thanks to our users for being on top of things. ...
22150
David Saff
dsaff
Dec 8, 2009 3:40 pm
Thanks, Markus. Fixed in 4.8.1. David Saff...
22151
loicmidy
Dec 9, 2009 12:02 pm
Hello, I have read severals books about Junit. The books explain well how to design a unit testable code and how to use stub and mock BUT I found few...
22152
David Saff
dsaff
Dec 9, 2009 4:20 pm
Ioic, In the end, I think experience is the most reliable guide. Most developers have experience already about tests they should have written: they're the...
22153
Paul King
paulk@...
Dec 10, 2009 6:37 am
Last time, some kind soul pushed 4.7 into the Maven repo. Thanks whoever that was! If you have time to upload the request for 4.8.1 I know I would greatly...
22154
baardl
bard.lind@...
Dec 11, 2009 12:15 am
Hi. I have been trying to use TestNG for a while, but found the transition a bit too hard :-) Categories in junit is looking promising, but there is two things...
22155
baardl
bard.lind@...
Dec 11, 2009 12:16 am
Hi. My take on using strings as markers are that this will faile over time. This due to miss-spelling of the category name, and because refactoring will be...
22156
Bill Shannon
bs00011
Dec 11, 2009 12:16 am
I've read the FAQ and the javadocs and done much web searching but can't find an answer to this. Sorry if this is stupid question. I need to write a test case...
22157
lcghent
Dec 11, 2009 2:40 am
Hey folks! This is sorta related to junit, but not specifically. I am writing some scripts to do some automated tests and need to report it to our Hudson...
22158
yme0987654321
Dec 11, 2009 4:23 am
The way I would handle this is to inject the relevant properties via a properties object, and then in production pass System.getProperties(), that way the...
22159
yme0987654321
Dec 11, 2009 4:29 am
One way to do this is to subclass the Suite runner and pass the array of classes to the Suite constructor. How you generate that array from the classes...
22160
cybernetics.core
cybernetics....
Dec 11, 2009 9:56 am
Hello, *! A short introduction before question: Let's say we are having a different test case files - one for each category, for example AmFM.java ...
22161
Bill Shannon
bs00011
Dec 11, 2009 9:57 am
I can't change the design of the class under test, its behavior is defined by a standard. As for different suites, are you suggesting that I separate the tests...
22162
yme0987654321
Dec 11, 2009 1:51 pm
I'm not really suggesting you change the overall design of the public API, I'm just suggesting you have a way of injecting a different properties object, via...
22163
David Saff
dsaff
Dec 11, 2009 2:55 pm
Bill, JUnit by itself probably can't help--it assumes that once a JVM is started with a list of tests, it's job is to plow through those tests with that JVM....
22164
David Saff
dsaff
Dec 11, 2009 2:59 pm
Jason, The XML format that has become standard was the one created by the ant team. A search for "ant junit xml" reveals some potentially useful links,...
22165
David Saff
dsaff
Dec 11, 2009 3:01 pm
This has come up a couple times, but it has design challenges, especially the need for the core JUnit runner, which should not know about categories, having to...
22166
Forsberg, Mike
mike.forsber...
Dec 11, 2009 3:10 pm
I for one 100% agree that reading system properties during a static initializer leads to untestable-like code. I think there are a few articles out there that...
22167
David Saff
dsaff
Dec 11, 2009 3:45 pm
Dmitry, I'm not aware of an existing GUI that would do what you want. There are ways to get it done in code: are you interested in those, or does it need to...
22168
David Saff
dsaff
Dec 11, 2009 3:47 pm
... Take a look at the cpsuite extension, which should take care of that. ... We don't contribute time or opinion to the maven project, so it's hard to say....
22169
Cédric Beust
cbeust
Dec 11, 2009 4:11 pm
... Well, TestNG has been using string groups for more than five years now and nobody has complained, so I don't think it's really failing. I don't even ...
