I have a template class and I have written an equals method to ensure that the proper logic is used when testing equality. However assertEquals never calls...
23397
i6941
Apr 20, 2011 10:55 pm
I write a siple program convert user's input to test case and invoke JUnit to run it. In Eclipse and Netbeans, you can see a progress bar when you run several...
23396
Swapnil Sapar
swapsapar
Apr 20, 2011 10:55 pm
Hi, I have been searching abt this for a while now. Could not find any good answer. I'm using JUnit 4.8.1 but can go to JUnit 3 if I have too. Here is my...
23395
Neale Upstone
nealeu
Apr 19, 2011 10:04 pm
I'll add another scenario into this mix: assumptions. Tools currently don't have the ability to report failed assumptions separately either. Given the tooling...
23394
lars.vonk
Apr 19, 2011 7:27 am
Hi, Thanks for the pointers everyone. I will look into it. I like Bill's suggestion. Since this concept is becoming more popular imho it would be nice if it is...
23393
Bill Venners
billvenners
Apr 17, 2011 3:40 am
Hi David, I usually see this concept called "pending" in other test frameworks. It is a useful concept, especially when testing in a BDD style. People like to ...
23392
Charlie Poole
cpoole98370
Apr 16, 2011 8:35 pm
Hi David, In NUnit 3.0, I'm using the following as a field of TestResult, to represent the overall outcome of the test. It was inspired by the Gallio folks. ...
23391
David Saff
dsaff
Apr 16, 2011 8:13 pm
My current feeling is that the best thing to do is to somehow allow custom categories of test results. I'm very reluctant to increase the number of built-in...
23390
Marc Guillemot
mguillemot
Apr 15, 2011 7:29 am
Hi, perhaps can you have a look at HtmlUnit's @NotYetImplemented annotation. This is what we use for tests that are known not yet to work. These tests are...
23389
lars.vonk
Apr 15, 2011 12:02 am
Hi, I would like to see progress in (acceptance) tests not yet implemented. I want these reported differently than normal failures. Is there a way in JUnit to...
23388
David Saff
dsaff
Apr 14, 2011 3:28 pm
All, I've got good news and bad news. The good news is that GitHub has released Issues 2.0, which, among other things, fixes the sorting options in the issues...
23387
Indrit Selimi
indritselimi
Apr 12, 2011 8:31 pm
Maybe you can use the Parameterized runner wired with your preferred RunnerScheduler (you have complete control on statement schedule). An example could be...
23386
David Saff
dsaff
Apr 8, 2011 6:25 pm
It is as of 4.9b1: https://github.com/dsaff/junit/blob/master/src/main/java/org/junit/ClassRule.java Share and Enjoy, David Saff...
23385
David Saff
dsaff
Apr 8, 2011 6:21 pm
That should be simple to encapsulate as a Rule. I'm not likely to get to it immediately (there's higher-voted feature requests to get to first), but I'd...
23384
David Saff
dsaff
Apr 8, 2011 6:20 pm
Neale, I was thinking something simpler, such as just using ErrorCollector.checkThat directly. David Saff On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Neale Upstone...
23383
lienrune
Apr 8, 2011 5:29 pm
Is it possible to define rules to be run BeforeClass and not on Method level which I have found so far ?...
23382
Cédric Beust
cbeust
Apr 8, 2011 12:27 am
FYI, this is how you do it with TestNG: @Test(invocationCount = 1000, threadPoolSize = 20) public void webServiceTest() { ... } Maybe something to consider for...
23381
Neale Upstone
nealeu
Apr 8, 2011 12:17 am
The ErrorCollector rule is interesting, in that assertThat(...) should be sufficient to add items without a change from Assert.assertThat(). How that would...
23380
David Saff
dsaff
Apr 7, 2011 5:11 pm
I don't have a built-in solution for running the multi-threading--you could probably do that with basic built-in Java threading primitives. (Let us know if you...
23379
uince1981
Apr 7, 2011 12:47 pm
Hi, I'm new to java and Junit, I need to stress test a set of web services, now for each web service I have a test like this: @Test public void...
23378
David Saff
dsaff
Apr 4, 2011 8:44 pm
I've generally found that it's nearly impossible to get "public" and "private" to mean everything I'd like them to mean: - Whether or not accessing the...
23377
Gabriele Kahlout
gabriele.kah...
Apr 4, 2011 3:11 pm
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Joakim Ohlrogge ... neither do i ... same here..and because i look for the highest value from my tests/coding I try to...
23376
Bill Venners
billvenners
Apr 4, 2011 8:57 am
Hi Daniel, Your email two weeks ago made me realize that testing combinations of invalid data is another use case for table-driven property checks in ...
23375
Joakim Ohlrogge
j0hlrogge
Apr 4, 2011 8:51 am
The argument: "I don't like the idea of changing production code just for testing" would not rub me the wrong way if the changes generally introduced for...
23374
Lance Zant
lancezant
Apr 3, 2011 11:11 pm
Ok, I think I finally get that the argument against testing private methods is a preference to push them down into finer grained classes where they are...
23373
Gabriele Kahlout
gabriele.kah...
Apr 3, 2011 1:38 pm
I think it's important to reduce the burden of TDD and having to worry about privates by trying to test them through public interfaces/wrappers is just not...
23372
Simon Chappell
spchappell
Apr 2, 2011 3:38 pm
... +1 with extra awesome. Simon -- simonpeter.org | simonpeter.com | newlife-upc.org [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]...
23371
MarvinToll.com
y153446
Apr 2, 2011 3:34 pm
Reflection is always the best way. Reflect on why the design lacks convenient testability....
23370
josephjohnallen
Apr 1, 2011 1:39 pm
thanks...
23369
Cédric Beust
cbeust
Mar 31, 2011 10:10 pm
To add to the good advice that's been given so far: you might also want to consider making your method more visible for testing and use an annotation or a...
