I have modified junkfilter.config to include the user's bodycheck functions: JF_BODYCHK_USER=1 And here are my new rules, which seemed to be catching most of...
Marc SCHAEFER
schaefer@...
Aug 2, 2000 6:20 am
106
Howdy, I run junkfilter at the "sendmail level" for our site. The local delivery agent for sendmail is procmail, and procmail references the site-wide...
Jeff A. Earickson
jaearick@...
Aug 2, 2000 2:20 pm
107
... Jeff, You've been running junkfilter for an awfully long time. Could you give me some kind of summary of which rules in sections 3 and 4 catch legitimate...
Gregory Sutter
gsutter@...
Aug 3, 2000 12:04 am
108
Greg,
I automatically turn off sections 3 and 4 when a new version of
junkfilter comes out, just 'cause they are advertised as possibly
trapping some legit...
Jeff A. Earickson
jaearick@...
Aug 3, 2000 12:22 am
109
... That means you run it for local users only. I also would like to run it for the domain I am the MX for (which then goes SMTP, BSMTP, UUCP, FTN, and other...
Marc SCHAEFER
schaefer@...
Aug 3, 2000 8:06 am
110
... I use procmail with Postfix, have since before it was released as Postfix, back when it was VMailer. Works great. Sure, there's a slight slowdown, since it...
Bennett Todd
bet@...
Aug 3, 2000 2:08 pm
111
JF_OPT_NOTRECIP doesn't work in junkfilter 20000313 because JFMAILADDRESS is not expanded. I have attached the patch to fix that. Regards, Hugo -- Hugo Haas...
Hugo Haas
hugo@...
Aug 21, 2000 3:09 pm
112
... Thanks, Hugo! Your fix will be in the next release. There is no expected release date, but if anyone's clamoring, I can roll one up. Let me know. ...
Gregory Sutter
gsutter@...
Aug 21, 2000 4:39 pm
113
Hi all, I've got the following line in my spam.rc * 1^0 ^Subject:.*([Ww]+[Aa]+[Nn]+[Tt]+[Ee]+[Dd]+ 9+7+ [Pp]+([Ee]+[Oo]+|[Oo]+[Ee] +)+[Pp]+[Ll]+[Ee]+) .* ...it...
Greg Webster
greg@...
Sep 8, 2000 3:52 pm
114
... of ... 997 ... First of all, procmail is not case sensitive so you should be able to do away with all the case-matching. Secondly, the .* at the end of the...
Phil Hord
phil@...
Sep 8, 2000 4:28 pm
115
I have a list of domains that I want to import into the jf-domains file. These domains are listed one per line. I am trying to import the list using jf. The...
jmunos@...
Sep 12, 2000 5:18 pm
116
Greg, I saw this reply to Hugo on the mailing list. Although I'm not clamoring for a new release, I am curious as to what has changed since March. Also, if...
Matt Perry
matt@...
Oct 25, 2000 5:49 am
117
... Several things have changed, but nothing very big. I've been very busy for a long time now, and haven't put much time in on junkfilter. However, you've...
Gregory Sutter
gsutter@...
Oct 25, 2000 6:02 pm
118
... Will this new RELEASE find itself into the FreeBSD ports tree rather quickly? Just curious. TIA -- ... Ron Rosson ... and a UNIX user...
Ron 'The InSaNe One' ...
insane@...
Oct 26, 2000 2:32 pm
119
... (reposted because previous attempt was made with wrong e-mail acct) I want the spam to be tagged with the "X-Spammer..." header and then go to another rule...
Pollywog
croak@...
Nov 7, 2000 6:17 pm
120
I can't figure out how to have junkfilter not save spam to a folder but to continue to another INCLUDERC. Is it possible to do that? -- Andrew...
Pollywog
croak@...
Nov 7, 2000 6:27 pm
121
... Sure. Instead of this, the default processing recipe: # Take action if junkfilter caught a junkmail. ... * JFEXP ?? . { ... * JFSTATUS ?? 1 ... } ...use...
Gregory Sutter
gsutter@...
Nov 8, 2000 3:36 am
122
... This is what I did. I removed the lock after E in the part of the recipe I added, because procmail had trouble with that lock. INCLUDERC=$JFDIR/junkfilter...
Pollywog
croak@...
Nov 8, 2000 4:21 am
123
... One more thing, my procmail log shows: procmail: Lock failure on "INCLUDERC=/home/pollywog/.procmail/cleanup.rc.lock" procmail: Error while writing to ...
Pollywog
croak@...
Nov 8, 2000 4:47 am
124
... Whoops. This is what I get for replying when I was really tired. The correct form of the recipe is: # Take action if junkfilter caught a junkmail. ... *...
Gregory Sutter
gsutter@...
Nov 8, 2000 7:21 pm
125
... It still does not seem to work. There is nothing in my log to show what the problem might be. -- Andrew...
Pollywog
croak@...
Nov 8, 2000 9:03 pm
126
... It still does not seem to work. There is nothing in my log to show what the problem might be. -- Andrew...
Pollywog
croak@...
Nov 8, 2000 9:42 pm
127
Hi, I just started using the whitelist feature of junkfilter and had ... +++ junkfilter.white 2000/11/16 18:35:35 @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ * $...
Matthew Hunt
mph@...
Nov 16, 2000 6:49 pm
128
Hi Greg - (Sorry for sending this straight to you rather than the mailing list; eGroups seems to be unwilling/unable to confirm my subscription. I'll sort it...
Stefek Zaba
gsutter@...
Dec 13, 2000 2:37 am
129
Hi all, I don't have access to a host permanently connected to the net but would like to get my email filtered. Does anyone know of a site that will allow me...
Martin Cleaver
Martin.Cleaver@...
Jan 1, 2001 11:10 am
130
... You don't need to be permanently connected to the net in order to be able to run procmail. Why don't You do it locally (as among many others, i do)? Happy...
Michael Ritzert
mjr@...
Jan 1, 2001 6:03 pm
131
I have Junkfilter enabled on a system wide basis. How can I disable Junkfilter for a single user? The README says to put a .junkfilterrc based on...
Shawn Ramsey
shawn@...
Jan 8, 2001 11:04 pm
132
... Hmmm. I never considered that case. Systemwide junkfilter enabling was an afterthought. :) You'll have to set everything to zero. JF_USER=0 JF_ONE=0 ...
Gregory Sutter
gsutter@...
Jan 9, 2001 8:54 pm
133
... Ok.. Were probably just gonna do it on a user by user basis now anyway. It seems to catch a bit much legitimate mail from a system wide filter. (order ...
Shawn Ramsey
shawn@...
Jan 9, 2001 10:33 pm
134
... If you still want to leave it on systemwide as well, you could just use sections 1 and 2; those will still catch some spam, and very rarely have false...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
