Want to know what is wrong with
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31913399/ns/business-autos/
Why is Wagoner getting a dime?. His company went bankrupt. The people
who in good faith invested capital in GM got nothing while Wagoner walks away
with a pension. Give me a break! His pension should have been the first of
GM’s debt to be struck down by the court. In the article there is a
comparison of other severance and retirement packages. For example, the former
CEO of Exxon got $400 million. There is a difference. The head of Exxon did
not drive the company into bankruptcy. Quite the contrary he helped build
Exxon into one of the most successful companies in the world. The CEO should
share in the profits he made his investors rich.
There is something very wrong with this picture. Well hell there is
something very wrong with the entire GM mess. One justification for Wagoner’s
pension was the length of time he was at GM. He spent 20 years killing the
company. If there is to be a stock holder’s revolt and a demand the
If there is to be a renaissance in the