Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
konicaslr · Konica SLR Users
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
2 quick questions   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #20471 of 20935 |
Re: 2 quick questions

Kosma,
In 1970 I paid a little over 200 USD for a T2 with the f1.8 kit lens from
either Cambridge Camera or 47th St Photo. A year later I bought a body only for
about 150 USD from Bailey's Crossroads Photo in northern Virginia. That was
more than the monthly rent on my apartment (120 USD), so they were not cheap. A
comparably equipped Nikon was around 300 USD from the New York dealers. The
500mm Vivitar preset was 78 USD (and the 92mm skylight filter was 97 USD - the
main reason I didn't buy it - cheaper to buy another lens).
Mike

--- In konicaslr@yahoogroups.com, Kosma Moczek <kosma@...> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:04 AM, frankgranovski<frankgranovski@...> wrote:
> > With my new-old Konica gear, well, there's no need looking for greener
grass.
>
> Actually, getting the 'greener grass' means you need to look for a
> proper film. Most cheap stuff (Kodak Gold, Fuji Superia, etc.) works
> well with cheap cameras, but the Konica lens, best-known for legendary
> sharpness and color rendition, need a good film to really show what
> they're worth! Shooting on a $1 film after spending vast amounts of
> money on the cameras is a kind of waste...
>
> > I still don't know why I didn't go for this stuff in the 70's.
> > I guess I was dumb. :-)
>
> Or you didn't wanted to mortgage your and your family's souls just to
> get a T2 with kit lens. ;-)
>
> Now seriously: does anyonw know what was the price equivalent of those
> cameras when they were still on the market?
>
> --
> Kosma Moczek
> http://www.kosma.pl/
>





Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:59 am

mmichaelski
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #20471 of 20935 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

1) I have a T3 and a NT3. The NT3 is touted as the better one. Why is that? (The feel the same to me.) 2) Which one's sharper, the 40/1.8 or the 50/1.7? (I...
Frank Granovski
frankgranovski
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2009
2:53 pm

Frank, The differences between the T3 and NT3 are minor and really only affect a couple of functions. The main one is the NT3 has a built-in hot shoe where the...
David Berrie
daveisoutfect
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2009
8:21 pm

Thanks for the info. I find the 40 and 50 equal with sharpness, but then I just went with my eyes could see. All my Konica gear is newish. The black T3 does...
Frank Granovski
frankgranovski
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2009
11:47 pm

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Frank ... You would have to run tests using low-speed, fine-grained film and crazy (and costly) enlargement before you could...
Kosma Moczek
kosma133
Offline Send Email
Jul 8, 2009
1:28 pm

Thanks, Kosma. I was just curious. I've now used all my lenses all are super-sharp. (24, 29/1.8, 40, 50/1.7, 135/3.2.) The 135 is really amazing! It blows the...
frankgranovski
Offline Send Email
Jul 10, 2009
3:40 pm

... Actually, getting the 'greener grass' means you need to look for a proper film. Most cheap stuff (Kodak Gold, Fuji Superia, etc.) works well with cheap...
Kosma Moczek
kosma133
Offline Send Email
Jul 10, 2009
5:00 pm

Okay, now that Kodachrome is gone, what sharp color film do you suggest? I had no idea that these cameras were expensive when the came out. Where they more...
frankgranovski
Offline Send Email
Jul 10, 2009
9:40 pm

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:03 PM, ... A knowledgeable person (photography chemist/technician) told me to avoid Kodak films in general and go for Fuji...
Kosma Moczek
kosma133
Offline Send Email
Jul 11, 2009
12:06 am

Thank you, Kosma....
frankgranovski
Offline Send Email
Jul 11, 2009
8:16 pm

A retired Kodak engineer told me that the Fuji 4 layer technology was developed to solve a specific problem, that has since been solved another way, and Fuji...
Paul Schmidt
wogster_ca
Offline Send Email
Jul 11, 2009
8:39 pm

Kosma, In 1970 I paid a little over 200 USD for a T2 with the f1.8 kit lens from either Cambridge Camera or 47th St Photo. A year later I bought a body only...
mmichaelski
Offline Send Email
Jul 11, 2009
12:59 am

... cpicalc says that 1970's $200 would be about $1100 now - which is about the price of EOS 500D with kit lens... -- Kosma Moczek http://www.kosma.pl/...
Kosma Moczek
kosma133
Offline Send Email
Jul 11, 2009
1:19 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help