All, Here are David's slave/master commands ; Set as Slave ADCP SM2 $W62 ; LISTENS FOR SYNCHRONIZING PULSE BEFORE EACH PING SA001 $W62 ; WAIT UP TO 300 SECONDS...
I believe SW500 is 0.5 seconds and ST300 is 300 seconds. Darryl can confirm this ... hopefully. :-) ... -- Daniel J. Torres Physical Oceanography Research...
I believe SW500 is 0.05 seconds - the WH manual says the units for the SW command are 1/10 milliseconds. This too could cause problems. We use SW5500 = 0.55...
Hi David (and All), Lisa, Dan, and Bruce you all pointed out the Master/Slave timing and there is an issue. The setup being used as the Master pinging 0.05...
Thanks Darryl.... seems like you have solved the mystery... I get confused with leading zeroes.... - so SW75 and SW00075 are the same? and ST300 and ST0300 are...
Hi Jules, Yep leading zeros are not required. I personally use them though as it helps me to make sure I do not make a mistake for the units. Regards, Darryl ...
Hi Darryl ! Yep, that's true. The upward (slave) was configurated like master and downward (master) like slave during that bad stations. So, at the end,...
Hello Dave, That is excellent news! It is always great when a clear explanation can be found. I will be providing this information to our Field Service Team...
Hi LADCPeople, I leave Saturday on a cruise where I will be using a dual Workhorse system for LADCP. I will be using instruments with firmware 16.30 for the...
Hi Lisa, Thanks for the file. Did you have just a single downward facing instrument? Just wondering about the sync commands. Without a slave, I don't think...
Yeah, you'll need the same thing, but with slave commands for the uplooker: ; - configure for slave ; pings per ensemble WP1 ; time per ensemble TE 00:00:00 ;...
Hi all, Martin has been on a cruise and of course changed everything in the package ;-) In ernest. He has improved the handling of very shallow casts, ...
Hi all, I'm using the new 10.8 version and during some cast a new figure appears with this message "DIFFERENT LAG RESULTS!!! CHECK NEW ROUTINE". Where is such...
Hi all, a colleague of ours, Robin Robertson, intends to use a Sontek ADCP (I do not know which type) as a lowered system (also don't know the setup). Has...
... Yes to both, but the experience with various units ranged from fair to disastrous. This was all around 10 years ago; by now, both the instruments and the...
Eric Firing escreveu: gkrahmann wrote: Hi all, a colleague of ours, Robin Robertson, intends to use a Sontek ADCP (I do not know which type) as a lowered ...
Hi Gerd, In 2004 I was on an Australian cruise where we used a dual-headed 250kHz Sontek system. Serguei Sokolov from CSIRO adapted Martin's software (Version...
Hi everybody, In a few days, we're going to start a cruise where fortunately there's a SADCP available. As I have never processed SADCP together with LADCP+CTD...
Hi everybody! I'm giving support to our research team who is actually on a cruise. The LADCP data from deployment test shows that the slave file has "BT Depht"...
Hi David, I had a quick look. The Master000.000 data file is indeed from a downward facing ADCP. It has no good BT data because the instrument does not appear...
Hi Daniel! You're right, I have received the confirmation that rosette system didn't approach the bottom, as it was a test and they're running out of time. ...
Hi David, Since LADCP processing requires only on-station SADCP data, minimal processing is usually ok. I have gotten good results from simple 3- or 5-minute...
Hi Daniel and all, At the end it seems we're having troubles with the ADCP which was looking down (we swapped them, and now it's looking up). Both of them have...
Hi all! We're on a cruise and just changed the electromechanical cable used to deploy our rosette (sbe 32 carousel). It seems the new cable is twisted what has...
Hi David, concerning #1 this should not be too much of a problem as long as the rosette rotates at a limited speed. We had a similar problem not too long ago...