In response to a vehement objection to the rejection of a post to this list (a post which both Pat and I felt was neither pursuant to the scholarly purposes of...
2
Ales Bican
Ales_Bican
Dec 27, 2003 10:31 am
... **I should have made clear that I was not puzzled at your introductory note (though I was puzzled that you were banned from elfling). And it would have...
3
Carl F. Hostetter
endorendil
Dec 27, 2003 12:58 pm
... No, it would not be allowed, being by definition off-topic. The fallacy of your argument lies in your false premise: that the link provided was to...
4
Ales Bican
Ales_Bican
Dec 27, 2003 9:12 pm
... **Now I understand my puzzlement: I did not know it was not off-topic. Before I sent my message, I re-read the description of the lambengolmor list on the...
5
Carl F. Hostetter
endorendil
Dec 28, 2003 2:24 am
... Again, I disagree with your apparent premise. "Interest in the scholarly study ... of the invented languages of J.R.R. Tolkien" clearly includes "the...
6
Ales Bican
Ales_Bican
Dec 28, 2003 11:10 pm
... **The way you edited my message is unfortunate but I should have made it more explicit. My remark that there was "[n]othing about 'the methods and...
7
Carl F. Hostetter
endorendil
Dec 29, 2003 1:19 am
... I did not "edit" your message in any way; it is still right there in the archives. All I did was quote parts of it, and show where and how I disagree with...
8
Ales Bican
Ales_Bican
Dec 29, 2003 8:48 pm
... **We are not going to pursue one another for each and every word, are we? What I meant (and I think you know it) is that having cut parts you did not want...
9
Didier
almacq.geo
Jun 24, 2004 2:51 pm
Lambengolmor message #694 by Carl Hostetter was cross-posted by its author to (at least, to my own knowledge) four Elvish-related mailing lists: elfling-d,...
10
Carl F. Hostetter
endorendil
Jun 24, 2004 5:35 pm
I did indeed give careful consideration to the cross-posting of my message, and stand by it. The message had several different purposes, each of which was...
