Is _ává_ a misprint for _áva_ on PE 17:143?

"The longer form _avá, ává_ was only used..."

Thank you,

Edouard Kloczko

[Having checked my photocopies, I can confirm
that the reading _ává_ for the second form is
definitely correct. However, the published text
does contain a different error at the beginning of
that same paragraph, where "_Va!_ as interjection
or adverb" should have _Vá!_ instead of _Va!_.
-- PHW]